Preprint Concept Paper Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Biological Constraint as a Cause of Aging

Version 1 : Received: 11 May 2022 / Approved: 16 May 2022 / Online: 16 May 2022 (14:02:16 CEST)

How to cite: Gems, D.; Kern, C. Biological Constraint as a Cause of Aging. Preprints 2022, 2022050212. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202205.0212.v1 Gems, D.; Kern, C. Biological Constraint as a Cause of Aging. Preprints 2022, 2022050212. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202205.0212.v1

Abstract

Aging rate differs greatly between species, indicating that the process of senescence is largely genetically determined. Senescence evolves in part due to antagonistic pleiotropy (AP), where selection favors gene variants that increase fitness earlier in life but promote pathology later. Identifying the biological mechanisms by which AP causes senescence is key to understanding the endogenous causes of aging and its attendant diseases. Here we argue that the frequent occurrence of AP as a property of genes reflects the presence of constraint in the biological systems that they specify. This arises particularly because the functionally interconnected nature of biological systems constrains the simultaneous optimization of coupled traits (interconnection constraints), or because individual traits cannot evolve (impossibility constraints). We present an account of aging that integrates AP and biological constraint with recent programmatic aging concepts, including costly programs, quasi-programs, hyperfunction and hypofunction. We argue that AP mechanisms of costly programs and triggered quasi-programs are consequences of constraint, in which costs resulting from hyperfunction or hypofunction cause senescent pathology. Impossibility constraint can also cause hypofunction independently of AP. We also describe how AP corresponds to Stephen Jay Gould’s constraint-based concept of evolutionary spandrels, and argue that pathologies arising from AP are bad spandrels. Biological constraint is a missing link between ultimate and proximate causes of senescence, including diseases of aging. That this was not realized previously may reflect a combination of hyperadaptationism among evolutionary biologists, and the erroneous assumption by biogerontologists that molecular damage accumulation is the principal primary cause of aging.

Keywords

aging; antagonistic pleiotropy; biological constraint; hyperfunction; hypofunction; programmatic aging; trade-off

Subject

Biology and Life Sciences, Anatomy and Physiology

Comments (0)

Comment 1
Received: 17 May 2022
Commenter: Lev Salnikov
The commenter has declared there is no conflict of interests.
Comment: Interesting article.
Similar views were published earlier in the articles -
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fragi.2020.608076/full https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fragi.2021.655315/full
+ Respond to this comment

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.