Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Methods for the Quantification of Particle-Bound Protein – Application to Reagents for Lateral-Flow Immunoassays (LFIA)

Version 1 : Received: 23 March 2022 / Approved: 24 March 2022 / Online: 24 March 2022 (14:32:48 CET)

How to cite: Tchipilov, T.; Raysyan, A.; Weller, M.G. Methods for the Quantification of Particle-Bound Protein – Application to Reagents for Lateral-Flow Immunoassays (LFIA). Preprints 2022, 2022030332. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202203.0332.v1 Tchipilov, T.; Raysyan, A.; Weller, M.G. Methods for the Quantification of Particle-Bound Protein – Application to Reagents for Lateral-Flow Immunoassays (LFIA). Preprints 2022, 2022030332. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202203.0332.v1

Abstract

Protein immobilization for the functionalization of particles is used in various applications, including biosensors, lateral-flow immunoassays (LFIA), bead-based assays, and others. Common methods for the quantification of bound protein are measuring protein in the supernatant before and after coating and calculating the difference. This popular approach has the potential for a significant overestimation of the amount of immobilized protein since layers not directly bound to the surface (soft protein corona) are usually lost during washing and handling. Only the layer directly bound to the surface (hard corona) can be used in subsequent assays. A simplified amino acid analysis method based on acidic hydrolysis and RP-HPLC-FLD of tyrosine and phenylalanine (aromatic amino acid analysis, AAAA) is proposed to directly quantify protein bound to the surface of gold nano- and latex microparticles. The results are compared with indirect methods such as colorimetric protein assays, such as Bradford, bicinchoninic acid (BCA), as well as AAAA of the supernatant. For both particle types, these indirect quantification techniques show a protein overestimation of up to 1700% compared to the direct AAAA measurements. In addition, protein coating on latex particles was performed both passively through adsorption and covalently through EDC/sulfo-NHS chemistry. Our results showed no difference between the immobilization methodologies. This finding suggests that usual protein determination methods are no unambiguous proof of a covalent conjugation on particles or beads.

Keywords

protein determination; soft protein corona; hard protein corona; covalent immobilization; supernatant method; gold nanoparticles; latex polymer particles; gold sodium chloride method; amino acid analysis; aromatic amino acid analysis; AAAA; acid hydrolysis

Subject

Biology and Life Sciences, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.