Preprint
Article

Differences and Similarities in Breast and Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake Among Municipalities in Flanders, Belgium

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Submitted:

02 March 2022

Posted:

14 March 2022

Read the latest preprint version here

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Abstract
Despite the recognized benefits of fecal occult blood test (FOBT) and mammography screenings, participation in breast (BC) and colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs is still suboptimal. In this study we investigate municipal characteristics associated with their BC/CRC screening uptake profiles among women aged 55-69 years. Using data from 308 municipalities of Flanders during 2014–2017, a profile for each municipality based on its BC/CRC screening uptake compared with the median screening uptake was created. Logistic regression with generalized estimating equations was used to assess the associations between municipal characteristics and BC/CRC screening uptake profiles. The overall median uptake of cancer screening was higher for CRC (57.4%) than for BC (54.6%). The following municipal characteristics were associated with worse performance in terms of only CRC, only BC, or both CRC and BC screening uptake respectively: non-Belgian/Dutch nationality, diabetes, 65-69 age group; non-Belgian/Dutch nationality, diabetes, disabilities; GP attendance and having children; The following municipal characteristics were associated with better performance in terms of only CRC, only BC, or both CRC and BC screening uptake respectively: having a partner, undergoing preventive dental care, jobseeker rate, higher education, residential stability; having a partner, undergoing preventive dental care, jobseeker rate; average income and (early) retirement rate. This study’s results regarding the interrelation between the BC and CRC screening could be used to tailor interventions aimed at improving participation of the target population in both programs.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.

Downloads

334

Views

307

Comments

0

Subscription

Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.

Email

Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated