Version 1
: Received: 26 February 2022 / Approved: 3 March 2022 / Online: 3 March 2022 (17:18:57 CET)
How to cite:
Pritchard, L.; Brown, C. T.; Harrington, B.; Heath, L. S.; Pierce-Ward, N. T.; Vinatzer, B. . A. Could a Focus on the “Why” of Taxonomy Help Taxonomy Better Respond to the Needs of Science and Society?. Preprints2022, 2022030069. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202203.0069.v1
Pritchard, L.; Brown, C. T.; Harrington, B.; Heath, L. S.; Pierce-Ward, N. T.; Vinatzer, B. . A. Could a Focus on the “Why” of Taxonomy Help Taxonomy Better Respond to the Needs of Science and Society?. Preprints 2022, 2022030069. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202203.0069.v1
Pritchard, L.; Brown, C. T.; Harrington, B.; Heath, L. S.; Pierce-Ward, N. T.; Vinatzer, B. . A. Could a Focus on the “Why” of Taxonomy Help Taxonomy Better Respond to the Needs of Science and Society?. Preprints2022, 2022030069. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202203.0069.v1
APA Style
Pritchard, L., Brown, C. T., Harrington, B., Heath, L. S., Pierce-Ward, N. T., & Vinatzer, B. . A. (2022). Could a Focus on the “Why” of Taxonomy Help Taxonomy Better Respond to the Needs of Science and Society?. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202203.0069.v1
Chicago/Turabian Style
Pritchard, L., N. Tessa Pierce-Ward and Boris A. Vinatzer. 2022 "Could a Focus on the “Why” of Taxonomy Help Taxonomy Better Respond to the Needs of Science and Society?" Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202203.0069.v1
Abstract
Genomics has put prokaryotic rank-based taxonomy on a solid phylogenetic foundation. However, most taxonomic ranks were set long before the advent of DNA sequencing and genomics. In this concept paper, we thus ask the simple yet profound question: Should prokaryotic classification schemes besides the current phylum-to-species ranks be explored, developed, and incorporated into scientific discourse? Could such alternative schemes provide better solutions to the basic need of science and society for which taxonomy was developed, namely, precise and meaningful identification? A neutral genome-similarity based framework is then described that could allow alternative classification schemes to be explored, compared, and translated into each other without having to choose only one as the gold standard. Classification schemes could thus continue to evolve and be selected according to their benefits and based on how well they fulfill the need for prokaryotic identification.
Biology and Life Sciences, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.