Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Evaluation of Face Shields, Goggles and Safety Glasses as a Virus Transmission Control Measure to Protect the Wearer Against Cough Droplets

Version 1 : Received: 23 February 2022 / Approved: 25 February 2022 / Online: 25 February 2022 (06:52:12 CET)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Samantha Hall, Paul Johnson, Claire Bailey, Zoe Gould, Robert White, Brian Crook, Evaluation of Face Shields, Goggles, and Safety Glasses as a Virus Transmission Control Measure to Protect the Wearer Against Cough Droplets, Annals of Work Exposures and Health, Volume 67, Issue 1, January 2023, Pages 36–49, https://doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxac047 Samantha Hall, Paul Johnson, Claire Bailey, Zoe Gould, Robert White, Brian Crook, Evaluation of Face Shields, Goggles, and Safety Glasses as a Virus Transmission Control Measure to Protect the Wearer Against Cough Droplets, Annals of Work Exposures and Health, Volume 67, Issue 1, January 2023, Pages 36–49, https://doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxac047

Abstract

Face shields (also referred to as visors), goggles and safety glasses have been worn during the COVID-19 pandemic as one measure to control transmission of the virus. However, their effectiveness in controlling facial exposure to cough droplets is not well established and standard tests for evaluating eye protection for this application are limited. A method was developed to evaluate face shields, goggles and safety glasses as a control measure to protect the wearer against cough droplets. The method uses a semi-quantitative assessment of facial droplet deposition. A cough simulator was developed to generate droplets comparable to those from a human cough. The droplets consisted of a UV fluorescent marker (fluorescein) in water. Fourteen face shields, four pairs of goggles and one pair of safety glasses were evaluated by mounting them on two different sizes of breathing manikin head and challenging them with the simulated cough. The manikin head was positioned in seven orientations relative to the cough simulator to represent various potential occupational exposure scenarios, for example, a nurse standing over a patient. Droplet deposition in the eyes, nose and mouth regions were visualised following three ‘coughs’. Face shields, goggles and safety glasses reduced, but did not eliminate exposure to the wearer from droplets such as those produced by a human cough. The level of protection differed based on the design of the personal protective equipment and the relative orientation of the wearer to the cough. For example, face shields and goggles offered the greatest protection when a cough challenge was face on or from above and the least protection when a cough challenge was from below. Face shields were also evaluated as source control to protect others from the wearer. Results suggested that if a coughing person wears a face shield, it can provide some protection from cough droplets to those standing directly in front of the wearer.

Keywords

face shield; goggles; safety glasses; cough; droplets; virus transmission; COVID 19; exposure

Subject

Physical Sciences, Applied Physics

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.