Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

GeoSPARQL 1.1: An Almost Decadal Update to the Most Important Geospatial LOD Standard

Version 1 : Received: 7 November 2021 / Approved: 9 November 2021 / Online: 9 November 2021 (14:05:34 CET)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Car, N.J.; Homburg, T. GeoSPARQL 1.1: Motivations, Details and Applications of the Decadal Update to the Most Important Geospatial LOD Standard. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2022, 11, 117. Car, N.J.; Homburg, T. GeoSPARQL 1.1: Motivations, Details and Applications of the Decadal Update to the Most Important Geospatial LOD Standard. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2022, 11, 117.

Abstract

In 2012 the Open Geospatial Consortium published GeoSPARQL defining “an RDF/OWL ontology for [spatial] information”, “SPARQL extension functions” for performing spatial operations on RDF data and “RIF rules” defining entailments to be drawn from graph pattern matching. In the 8+ years since its publication, GeoSPARQL has become the most important spatial Semantic Web standard, as judged by references to it in other Semantic Web standards and its wide use for Semantic Web data. An update to GeoSPARQL was proposed in 2019 to deliver a version 1.1 with a charter to: handle outstanding change requests and source new ones from the user community and to “better present” the standard, that is to better link all the standard’s parts and better document & exemplify elements. Expected updates included new geometry representations, alignments to other ontologies, handling of new spatial referencing systems, and new artifact presentation. In this paper, we describe motivating change requests and actual resultant updates in the candidate version 1.1 of the standard alongside reference implementations and usage examples. We also describe the theory behind particular updates, initial implementations of many parts of the standard, and our expectations for GeoSPARQL 1.1’s use.

Keywords

GeoSPARQL; GeoSPARQL 1.1; spatial; geospatial; Semantic Web; RDF; OWL; OGC; Open Geospatial Consortium; standard; ontology.

Subject

Computer Science and Mathematics, Geometry and Topology

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.