Article
Version 1
Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed
Scrutiny of the So-Called Einstein’s Causality
Version 1
: Received: 2 October 2021 / Approved: 6 October 2021 / Online: 6 October 2021 (16:57:48 CEST)
How to cite: Hassani, M.E. Scrutiny of the So-Called Einstein’s Causality. Preprints 2021, 2021100110. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202110.0110.v1 Hassani, M.E. Scrutiny of the So-Called Einstein’s Causality. Preprints 2021, 2021100110. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202110.0110.v1
Abstract
In the present paper, the so-called Einstein’s causality is scrutinized and proven to be an illusion, a sort of mathematical fallacy. Causality as a well-established universal principle was and is absolutely valid for subluminal, luminal and superluminal signals under any natural and/or artificial circumstances. It is also shown that conceptually special relativity theory (SRT) is inapplicable to superluminality of physical phenomena since SRThas the light speed in vacuum as an upper limiting speed in its own proper domain of applications, and also because SRT is crucially based on the concept of inertial reference frames (IRFs) which are related to each other by Lorentz transformations, that is why the relative velocity of any two IRFs must be smaller than light speed.
Keywords
causality; special relativity theory; light speed in vacuum; superluminal signals
Subject
Physical Sciences, Acoustics
Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Comments (0)
We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.
Leave a public commentSend a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
