Preprint Concept Paper Version 2 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Epidemiology: Gray Immunity Model Gives Qualitatively Different Predictions

Version 1 : Received: 7 September 2021 / Approved: 8 September 2021 / Online: 8 September 2021 (20:33:48 CEST)
Version 2 : Received: 6 October 2021 / Approved: 6 October 2021 / Online: 6 October 2021 (11:50:28 CEST)

How to cite: Watve, M.; Bhisikar, H.; Kharate, R. Epidemiology: Gray Immunity Model Gives Qualitatively Different Predictions. Preprints 2021, 2021090162 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202109.0162.v2). Watve, M.; Bhisikar, H.; Kharate, R. Epidemiology: Gray Immunity Model Gives Qualitatively Different Predictions. Preprints 2021, 2021090162 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202109.0162.v2).

Abstract

Compartmental models like the SIR model that dynamically divide the host population in categories such as susceptible, infected and immune form the mainstream of epidemiological modelling. Effectively such models treat infection and immunity as binary variables. We show here that considering immunity as a continuous variable instead of binary and incorporating factors that bring about small changes in immunity lead to qualitatively different epidemiological predictions. The small immunity effects (SIE) constitute cross immunity by other infections, small increments in immunity by sub clinical exposures and slow decay in the absence of repeated exposure. The SIE model explains many epidemiological patterns observed during the Covid-19 pandemic that are not adequately explained by conventional models. In the SIE model repeated waves are possible without the need for new variants. Peak and decline of a wave much before reaching herd immunity threshold, low level apparently stable existence of the pathogen, new surges after variable and unpredictable gaps, new surge after vaccinating majority of population are the common features of the pandemic mimicked by simulations using the SIE model. The model further shows complex interactions of different interventions that can be contextually synergistic as well as antagonistic. As a result, interventions intended to arrest the transmission are not always effective and can turn counterproductive under some conditions. Interventions that are beneficial in the short run can be potentially hazardous in the long run. In the absence of empirical estimates of many parameters, the model may not be useful to make quantitative predictions at this stage but it certainly challenges traditional wisdom and currently held beliefs behind non-pharmaceutical interventions recommended to control the epidemic. We also suggest testable predictions to differentiate between the causal logic of the SIE model against the prevalent explanations for the same observed phenomena.

Keywords

Epidemiological model; immunity; Covid-19

Comments (1)

Comment 1
Received: 6 October 2021
Commenter: Milind Watve
Commenter's Conflict of Interests: Author
Comment: One of the testable predictions of the model, specified in the first fersion, has actually been tested with data. This analysis is added to figure 5 and the methodological details of it in supplementary material. Testing the prediction strengthens the model further. The person doing the analysis is added as coauthor. 
+ Respond to this comment

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 1
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.