Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

The Stumblemeter: Design and Validation of a System that Detects and Classifies Stumbles During Gait

Version 1 : Received: 21 July 2021 / Approved: 22 July 2021 / Online: 22 July 2021 (13:41:35 CEST)

How to cite: Hartog, D.D.; Harlaar, J.; Smit, G. The Stumblemeter: Design and Validation of a System that Detects and Classifies Stumbles During Gait. Preprints 2021, 2021070519 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202107.0519.v1). Hartog, D.D.; Harlaar, J.; Smit, G. The Stumblemeter: Design and Validation of a System that Detects and Classifies Stumbles During Gait. Preprints 2021, 2021070519 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202107.0519.v1).

Abstract

Stumbling during gait is commonly encountered in patients who suffer from mild to serious walking problems, e.g. after stroke, in osteoarthritis, or amputees using a lower leg prosthesis. Instead of self-reporting, an objective assessment of the amount of stumbles in daily life would inform clinicians more accurately and enable the evaluation of treatments that aim to achive a safer walking pattern. An easy to use wearable might fullfill this need. The goal of the present study was to investigate whether a single inertial measurement unit (IMU) placed at the shank and machine learning algorithms could be used to detect and classify stumbling events in a dataset comprising of a wide variety of daily movements. Ten healthy test subjects were deliberately tripped by an unexpected and unseen obstacle while walking on a treadmill. The subjects stumbled a total of 276 times, both using an elevating recovery strategy and a lowering recovery strategy. Subjects also performed multiple Activities of Daily Living. During data processing, an event-defined window segmentation technique was used to trace high peaks in acceleration which could potentially be stumbles. In the reduced dataset, time windows were labelled with the aid of video annotation. Subsequently, discriminative features were extracted and fed to train seven different types of machine learning algorithms. Trained machine learning algorithms were validated using leave-one-subject-out cross-validation. Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithms were most succesful, and could detect and classify stumbles with 100% sensitivity, 100% specificity and, 96.7% accuracy, in the independent testing dataset. The SVM algorithms were implemented in a user-friendly, freely available, stumble detection app named Stumblemeter. This work shows that stumble detection and classification based on SVMs is accurate and ready to apply in clinical practise.

Keywords

Stumbling; detection; machine learning; inertial measurement unit; amputee; osseointegration

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.