Version 1
: Received: 15 October 2020 / Approved: 16 October 2020 / Online: 16 October 2020 (19:35:42 CEST)
Version 2
: Received: 3 December 2020 / Approved: 4 December 2020 / Online: 4 December 2020 (11:09:42 CET)
How to cite:
Hossain, M.M.; Begum, M.; Rahman, M.M.; Hashem, A.; Bell, R.W. Influence of Unpadded Transplanting on Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Retained Reside of Previous Mustard. Preprints2020, 2020100357. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202010.0357.v1
Hossain, M.M.; Begum, M.; Rahman, M.M.; Hashem, A.; Bell, R.W. Influence of Unpadded Transplanting on Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Retained Reside of Previous Mustard. Preprints 2020, 2020100357. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202010.0357.v1
Hossain, M.M.; Begum, M.; Rahman, M.M.; Hashem, A.; Bell, R.W. Influence of Unpadded Transplanting on Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Retained Reside of Previous Mustard. Preprints2020, 2020100357. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202010.0357.v1
APA Style
Hossain, M.M., Begum, M., Rahman, M.M., Hashem, A., & Bell, R.W. (2020). Influence of Unpadded Transplanting on Rice (<em>Oryza sativa</em> L.) Retained Reside of Previous Mustard. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202010.0357.v1
Chicago/Turabian Style
Hossain, M.M., Abul Hashem and Richard W. Bell. 2020 "Influence of Unpadded Transplanting on Rice (<em>Oryza sativa</em> L.) Retained Reside of Previous Mustard" Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202010.0357.v1
Abstract
On-farm research was conducted at Gouripur sub-district under Mymensingh district of Bangladesh during boro (mid November-June) season in 2013-14 and 2014-15 to evaluate the performance of unpadded rice cultivation with crop residue retention. The rice var. BRRI dhan28 was transplanted by two tillage practices viz., puddled conventional tillage (CT) and non-puddled strip tillage (ST) and two levels of mustard residues, i.e., no residue (R0) and 50% residue (R50). The experiment had designed in a randomized complete block design with four replications. There were no significant yield differences between tillage practices and residue levels in 2013-14. But in the following year, ST yielded higher grains (5.72 t ha-1), which was about 9.36 % higher compared to CT. The higher grain yield in ST, leading to 22.23% higher BCR compared to CT. Retention of 50% residue increased by 3.15 % yield compared to no-residue, which contributed to 10.58 % higher benefit-cost ratio (BCR). The ST combine with 50 % residue retention yielded the highest grain yield (5.81 t ha-1) which credited to obtain the highest BCR (1.06).
Keywords
unpadded; strip tillage; crop residues; yield
Subject
Biology and Life Sciences, Agricultural Science and Agronomy
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
