Working Paper Article Version 1 This version is not peer-reviewed

Use of Checklist Method for Evaluation of HSE Performance of Tehran Municipality Contractors: Case Study of Contractors

Version 1 : Received: 26 August 2020 / Approved: 27 August 2020 / Online: 27 August 2020 (08:45:13 CEST)

How to cite: Safari, F.; Jaddi Madarsara, T.; Saeidabadi, H.; Yari, S. Use of Checklist Method for Evaluation of HSE Performance of Tehran Municipality Contractors: Case Study of Contractors . Preprints 2020, 2020080602 Safari, F.; Jaddi Madarsara, T.; Saeidabadi, H.; Yari, S. Use of Checklist Method for Evaluation of HSE Performance of Tehran Municipality Contractors: Case Study of Contractors . Preprints 2020, 2020080602

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the performance of health, safety and environmental management of civil, traffic and urban services contractors in the 18th district of Tehran municipality in 2015-2016. Methods: This is an applied, longitudinal, descriptive-comparative study. The statistical population of this study was construction contractors, urban services and traffic in the municipality of district 18 of Tehran in the years 2015-2016. from 52 contractors, 18 construction contractors, 21 utilities contractors and 13 traffic contractors, respectively, were selected using census method. the research instrument consisted of periodic direct observation and completion of the HSE standard checklist by researchers. Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric test by SPSS software.Results: The HSE performance of all contractors (civil, utilities and traffic) was acceptable and the results of Kruskal-Wallis test showed that the HSE performance of contractors at the second visit of 2015 and the first visit of 2016 was significantly different in favor of civil contractors )p <0.01), but there was no significant difference between the first and third visits of 2015 and the second and third visits of 2016 (p> 0.05). visits in six periods indicate HSE Civil Contractors status increased from 100% unfavorable to 88.88% acceptable level and 11.11% good level, and in the case of civil service contractors who initially had 95.23% in an unfavorable situation and 4.76% in a favorable situation achieved 100% acceptable performance, and finally, the traffic contractors, who were 100% unfavorable, were upgraded to 100% acceptable. Conclusion: According to the findings of the study, it seems that the supervision of municipality inspectors on HSE performance of contractors can be effective in improving and strengthening the commitment to HSE requirements, therefore, it is suggested that periodical visits be made to the municipal contractors.

Subject Areas

health; safety and environment management; HSE; performance evaluation; checklist; contractors

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.