Working Paper Review Version 2 This version is not peer-reviewed

The Boggarts of Biology: How Non-Genetic Changes Influence the Genotype

Version 1 : Received: 11 August 2020 / Approved: 13 August 2020 / Online: 13 August 2020 (05:23:46 CEST)
Version 2 : Received: 5 October 2020 / Approved: 6 October 2020 / Online: 6 October 2020 (15:16:03 CEST)

How to cite: Samhita, L. The Boggarts of Biology: How Non-Genetic Changes Influence the Genotype. Preprints 2020, 2020080289 Samhita, L. The Boggarts of Biology: How Non-Genetic Changes Influence the Genotype. Preprints 2020, 2020080289

Abstract

The notion that there is a one to one mapping from genotype to phenotype was overturned a long time ago. Along with genotype and environment, ‘non-genetic changes’ orchestrated by altered RNA and protein molecules also guide the development of phenotype. The idea that there is a route through which changes in phenotype can lead to changes in genotype impinges on several phenomena of molecular, developmental, evolutionary and applied interest. Phenotypic changes that do not alter the underlying DNA sequence have been studied across model systems (eg: DNA and histone modifications, RNA editing, prion formation) and are known to play an important role in short term adaptation. However, because of their transient nature and unstable inheritance, the role of such changes in long term evolution has remained controversial. I classify and review three ways in which non-genetic changes can influence genotype and impact cellular fitness across generations, with an emphasis on the enticing idea that they may act as stepping stones for genetic adaptation. I focus on work from microbial systems and attempt to highlight recent experiments and models that bear on this idea. Overall, I review evidence which suggests that non-genetic changes can impact phenotype via their influence on the genotype, and thus play a role in evolutionary change.

Subject Areas

Non-genetic change; translation errors; phenotypic variability; adaptation; evolution

Comments (1)

Comment 1
Received: 6 October 2020
Commenter: Laasya Samhita
Commenter's Conflict of Interests: Author
Comment: Re-organisation of the abstract, first part of introduction and first part of the discussion. Added three lines in Box1
+ Respond to this comment

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 1
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.