Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Open-Ended Descriptions of Religious/Spiritual Struggles: Salient Themes and Associations with the Religious and Spiritual Struggles (RSS) Scale and Religiousness

Version 1 : Received: 22 July 2020 / Approved: 24 July 2020 / Online: 24 July 2020 (10:06:08 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Wilt, J.A.; Takahashi, J.T.; Jeong, P.; Exline, J.J.; Pargament, K.I. Open-Ended and Closed-Ended Measures of Religious/Spiritual Struggles: A Mixed-Methods Study. Religions 2020, 11, 505. Wilt, J.A.; Takahashi, J.T.; Jeong, P.; Exline, J.J.; Pargament, K.I. Open-Ended and Closed-Ended Measures of Religious/Spiritual Struggles: A Mixed-Methods Study. Religions 2020, 11, 505.

Abstract

Religious and spiritual struggles are typically assessed by self-report scales using closed-ended items, yet nascent research suggests that using open-ended items may complement and advance assessment. In the current study, undergraduate participants (N = 976) completed open-ended descriptions of their religious and spiritual struggles, the Religious and Spiritual Struggles Scale (RSS), and a standardized measures of religious belief salience. Qualitative coding showed that the themes emerging from open-ended descriptions generally fell within the broad domains of the RSS though some descriptions reflected more contextualized struggles. Scores derived from the open-ended responses to assess RSS domains achieved evidence of reliability as well as convergent and discriminant validity with the RSS . Correlations revealed a mix of similar and divergent associations between methods of assessing religious and spiritual struggles and religious belief salience. Open-ended descriptions of religious and spiritual struggles may yield reliable and valid information that is related to but distinct from assessments relying on closed-ended items.

Keywords

Religious and spiritual struggles; open-ended items; closed-ended items; religious belief salience

Subject

Social Sciences, Psychology

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.