Version 1
: Received: 8 July 2020 / Approved: 9 July 2020 / Online: 9 July 2020 (07:41:32 CEST)
Version 2
: Received: 12 August 2020 / Approved: 20 August 2020 / Online: 20 August 2020 (03:59:10 CEST)
How to cite:
Jensen, A.; Sehovic, Z.; St. Clair Knobloch, N.; Klein, J.; Richardson, P.; Janiski, J. Mass Timber Solutions for Eight Story Mixed-Use Buildings: A Comparative Study of GHG emissions. Preprints2020, 2020070175
Jensen, A.; Sehovic, Z.; St. Clair Knobloch, N.; Klein, J.; Richardson, P.; Janiski, J. Mass Timber Solutions for Eight Story Mixed-Use Buildings: A Comparative Study of GHG emissions. Preprints 2020, 2020070175
Jensen, A.; Sehovic, Z.; St. Clair Knobloch, N.; Klein, J.; Richardson, P.; Janiski, J. Mass Timber Solutions for Eight Story Mixed-Use Buildings: A Comparative Study of GHG emissions. Preprints2020, 2020070175
APA Style
Jensen, A., Sehovic, Z., St. Clair Knobloch, N., Klein, J., Richardson, P., & Janiski, J. (2020). Mass Timber Solutions for Eight Story Mixed-Use Buildings: A Comparative Study of GHG emissions. Preprints. https://doi.org/
Chicago/Turabian Style
Jensen, A., Paul Richardson and Julie Janiski. 2020 "Mass Timber Solutions for Eight Story Mixed-Use Buildings: A Comparative Study of GHG emissions" Preprints. https://doi.org/
Abstract
Efforts to quantify and reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of the built environment often neglect embodied emissions, instead focusing on reducing emissions from building operations. Utilizing sustainably sourced mass timber offers low embodied carbon alternatives to traditional concrete and steel structural systems, however the variability in embodied carbon for different mass timber approaches remains understudied. In this study, we used life cycle assessment (LCA) to compare the whole building embodied carbon of nine mass timber design options and two typical concrete and steel reference cases for an eight-story mixed-use building, ensuring structural, acoustic, thermal, programmatic, and fire-rating equivalence between the designs. The study found that the mass timber designs vary significantly, ranging between a 14-52% reduction in whole building embodied carbon from the most impactful reference case, and a 31-73% reduction when considering the structural systems alone. This study demonstrates the value that whole building LCA (WBLCA) provides as a primary driver for low-carbon structural system design and architectural development of mass timber buildings, beyond that of single material comparisons using environmental product declarations (EPDs).
Keywords
mass timber; life cycle assessment; embodied carbon; sustainable design; functional equivalence
Subject
Engineering, Architecture, Building and Construction
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Commenter: Aurora Jensen
Commenter's Conflict of Interests: Author