Version 1
: Received: 30 June 2020 / Approved: 30 June 2020 / Online: 30 June 2020 (10:12:33 CEST)
How to cite:
Saha, I.; Mukherjee, T. Comparative Study of Mixture Model and Eulerian Model Used in Hydrocyclone with the Help of CFD Simulation. Preprints2020, 2020060364. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202006.0364.v1
Saha, I.; Mukherjee, T. Comparative Study of Mixture Model and Eulerian Model Used in Hydrocyclone with the Help of CFD Simulation. Preprints 2020, 2020060364. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202006.0364.v1
Saha, I.; Mukherjee, T. Comparative Study of Mixture Model and Eulerian Model Used in Hydrocyclone with the Help of CFD Simulation. Preprints2020, 2020060364. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202006.0364.v1
APA Style
Saha, I., & Mukherjee, T. (2020). Comparative Study of Mixture Model and Eulerian Model Used in Hydrocyclone with the Help of CFD Simulation. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202006.0364.v1
Chicago/Turabian Style
Saha, I. and Tathagata Mukherjee. 2020 "Comparative Study of Mixture Model and Eulerian Model Used in Hydrocyclone with the Help of CFD Simulation" Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202006.0364.v1
Abstract
Due to the accuracy of numerical calculation of fluid flow inside a hydrocyclone can be obtained using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), highly modified super computers are used to simulate the fluid flow and track particle motion inside a hydrocyclone. This paper deals with the numerical study using three multiphase models viz. Volume of fluid, Mixture and Eulerian model. The dimensions of the hydrocyclone taken into consideration for numerical analysis is same as considered by Rajamani. Validation of axial and tangential velocities at different strategically decided axial stations, RMS axial and tangential velocity profiles of the hydrocyclone is done using Reynolds Stress Model (RSM). The hydrocyclone model has been designed in Creo 3.0 using the same dimensions which later was imported to CFD for meshing. Fine hexagonal mesh numbering up to 5 lacs were constructed to obtain optimum results. Fluid flow was allowed to be developed in ANSYS FLUENT 16.2. Entire simulation took 96 hours to generate results and track particle movements inside the hydrocyclone. The particle tracking has been done using three multiphase model. The first being the volume of fluid was used for validation purposes and the comparison of the Mixture and Eulerian model are the basic focus of this research work. Conclusive results indicate that usage of different multiphase model does not result in variation in particle motion. The slight variation in grade efficiency values are hardly noticeable. The Mixture model and Eulerian model predict lower separation efficiency as compared with Volume of fluid multiphase model.
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
