Working Paper Article Version 3 This version is not peer-reviewed

Gilbreath Sequences and Proof of Conditions for Gilbreath Conjecture

Version 1 : Received: 6 March 2020 / Approved: 8 March 2020 / Online: 8 March 2020 (17:19:33 CET)
Version 2 : Received: 10 April 2020 / Approved: 12 April 2020 / Online: 12 April 2020 (14:53:47 CEST)
Version 3 : Received: 21 September 2020 / Approved: 22 September 2020 / Online: 22 September 2020 (08:49:55 CEST)
Version 4 : Received: 20 February 2023 / Approved: 21 February 2023 / Online: 21 February 2023 (14:30:09 CET)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Gatti, R. Gilbreath Equation, Gilbreath Polynomials, and Upper and Lower Bounds for Gilbreath Conjecture. Mathematics 2023, 11, 4006. Gatti, R. Gilbreath Equation, Gilbreath Polynomials, and Upper and Lower Bounds for Gilbreath Conjecture. Mathematics 2023, 11, 4006.

Abstract

The conjecture attributed to Norman L. Gilbreath, but formulated by Francois Proth in the second half of the 1800s, concerns an interesting property of the ordered sequence of prime numbers $P$. Gilbreath conjecture stated that, if we compute the absolute values of differences of consecutive primes on ordered sequence of prime numbers, and if this calculation is repeated for the terms in the new sequence and so on, every sequence will start with 1. In this paper the concept of Gilbreath sequence, Gilbreath triangle and Gilbreath equation are defined and on the basis of the results obtained from their properties, an inductive proof is produced, which establishes the necessary condition to state that Gilbreath conjecture is true.

Keywords

Gilbreath's conjecture; Gilbreth's sequence; sequence; prime numbers; number theory

Subject

Computer Science and Mathematics, Algebra and Number Theory

Comments (1)

Comment 1
Received: 22 September 2020
Commenter: Riccardo Gatti
Commenter's Conflict of Interests: Author
Comment: Improvement of the layout and references. Correction of proof of theorem (2).
+ Respond to this comment

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 1
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.