Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

The Facility List Coder: A Tool to Evaluate Community Food Environments

Version 1 : Received: 6 August 2019 / Approved: 7 August 2019 / Online: 7 August 2019 (16:53:36 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Arcila-Agudelo, A.M.; Muñoz-Mora, J.C.; Farran-Codina, A. Validity and Reliability of the Facility List Coder, a New Tool to Evaluate Community Food Environments. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 3578. Arcila-Agudelo, A.M.; Muñoz-Mora, J.C.; Farran-Codina, A. Validity and Reliability of the Facility List Coder, a New Tool to Evaluate Community Food Environments. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 3578.

Abstract

A community food environment plays an essential role in explaining the healthy life-style patterns of its community members. However, there is a lack of compelling quantitative approaches to evaluate these environments. This study introduces and validates a new tool named the Facility List Coder (FLC), whose purpose is to assess food environments based on data sources and classification algorithms. Using the case of Mataró (Spain), we randomly selected 301 grids areas (100 m2) where we conducted street audits in order to physically identify all the facilities by name, address and type. Then, audit-identified facilities were matched with those automatically-identified and were classified using the FLC in order to determine its quality. Our results suggest that automatically-identified and audit-identified food environments have a high level of agreement. The ICC estimates and their respective 95% confidence intervals for the overall sample, yield the result “excellent” (ICC ≥ 0.9) for the level of reliability of the FLC.

Keywords

community food environment; nutrition environment; geographical information systems (GIS); Facility List Coder; Python

Subject

Biology and Life Sciences, Food Science and Technology

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.