Working Paper Review Version 1 This version is not peer-reviewed

Transanal Repair of Rectocele and Rectal Mucosectomy with a Single Circular Stapler (TRREMS) - Why is it Worth Rehearse?

Version 1 : Received: 19 June 2019 / Approved: 10 July 2019 / Online: 10 July 2019 (08:12:26 CEST)

How to cite: Fišere, I.; Gardovskis, A.; Pavārs, M.; Gardovskis, J. Transanal Repair of Rectocele and Rectal Mucosectomy with a Single Circular Stapler (TRREMS) - Why is it Worth Rehearse?. Preprints 2019, 2019070141 Fišere, I.; Gardovskis, A.; Pavārs, M.; Gardovskis, J. Transanal Repair of Rectocele and Rectal Mucosectomy with a Single Circular Stapler (TRREMS) - Why is it Worth Rehearse?. Preprints 2019, 2019070141

Abstract

Background The aim of this literature review was to make future guidelines for clinical tretment and next study about preoperative and postoperative clinical and functional evaluation of symptoms after transanal repair of rectocele and rectal mucosectomy with a single circular stapler(TRREMS procedure),used for treatment of obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) caused by rectocele and rectal mucosal prolpase (RMP). Since anorectocele is usually associated with mucosa prolapse and/or rectal intussusceptions, it was developed a stapled surgical technique using one circular stapler. Methods An organized search of Medline/PubMed and medical Database of Clinical Trials was performed, from 1996 to 2016 using the key words „rectal prolapse”,”rectocele”, „ODS”,”Defecography”,”STARR”, „TRREMS”.Results The results of clinical studies are good for improving the quality of life of patients who underwent transanal repair of rectocele and rectal mucosectomy with a single circular stapler(TRREMS). The method can be considered as safe. Clearly to be implemented in our practice, for specific indications.

Keywords

constipation; obstructed defecation syndrome; rectocele; defecography; rectal mucosal prolapse; transanal repair; TRREMS

Subject

Medicine and Pharmacology, Clinical Medicine

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.