Preprint Review Version 2 This version is not peer-reviewed

Sleep Disorders as a Mediator Between Socioeconomic Status and Health Outcomes: A Review of Differents Theories

Version 1 : Received: 17 November 2018 / Approved: 20 November 2018 / Online: 20 November 2018 (15:37:27 CET)
Version 2 : Received: 8 December 2018 / Approved: 10 December 2018 / Online: 10 December 2018 (14:18:30 CET)

How to cite: Etindele Sosso, F.A.; Papadopoulos, D.. Sleep Disorders as a Mediator Between Socioeconomic Status and Health Outcomes: A Review of Differents Theories. Preprints 2018, 2018110506 (doi: 10.20944/preprints201811.0506.v2). Etindele Sosso, F.A.; Papadopoulos, D.. Sleep Disorders as a Mediator Between Socioeconomic Status and Health Outcomes: A Review of Differents Theories. Preprints 2018, 2018110506 (doi: 10.20944/preprints201811.0506.v2).

Abstract

The variations in socioeconomic status (SES) between different social classes of a population correspond to differences in accessibility to all resources available and able to improve global health. While SES is now known as one of the main determinants for a good health and a good aging, its influence on sleep disorders (SD) is not well understood. SES is a concept, not directly observable but estimated using indicators like income, education, occupational status and area of living. This theoretical review explores some theories linking environment of people with occurrence of SD, with different patterns associated to SES. A model of interaction is proposed to summarize and conceptualizes these interactions and to promote more research on the topic.

Subject Areas

circadian rhythm; sleep disorders; socioeconomic status; stress; allostatic load; health outcome

Readers' Comments and Ratings (2)

Importance: How significant is the paper to the field?
Outstanding/highlight paper
0%
Significant contribution
0%
Incremental contribution
100%
No contribution
0%
Soundness of evidence/arguments presented:
Conclusions well supported
0%
Most conclusions supported (minor revision needed)
0%
Incomplete evidence (major revision needed)
100%
Hypothesis, unsupported conclusions, or proof-of-principle
0%
Comment 1
Received: 11 January 2019
Commenter: Muhammad Shahzad Aslam (Click to see Publons profile: )
The commenter has declared there is no conflict of interests.
Comment: The theoretical aspect of this article is well written but there is a need of some more illustrations as well.
Overall manuscript is good and clear
+ Respond to this comment
Comment 2
Received: 11 January 2019
Commenter: Muhammad Shahzad Aslam (Click to see Publons profile: )
The commenter has declared there is no conflict of interests.
Comment: The theoretical aspect of this article is well written but there is a need of some more illustrations as well.
Overall manuscript is good and clear
+ Respond to this comment
Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
Rate this article
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 2
Metrics 0
Leave a public comment

×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.