Preprint Article Version 1 This version is not peer-reviewed

Comparing Supervised Machine Learning Strategies and Linguistic Features to Search for Very Negative Opinions

Version 1 : Received: 16 November 2018 / Approved: 19 November 2018 / Online: 19 November 2018 (09:35:13 CET)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Almatarneh, S.; Gamallo, P. Comparing Supervised Machine Learning Strategies and Linguistic Features to Search for Very Negative Opinions. Information 2019, 10, 16. Almatarneh, S.; Gamallo, P. Comparing Supervised Machine Learning Strategies and Linguistic Features to Search for Very Negative Opinions. Information 2019, 10, 16.

Journal reference: Information 2019, 10, 16
DOI: 10.3390/info10010016

Abstract

In this paper, we examine the performance of several classifiers in the process of searching for very negative opinions. More precisely, we do an empirical study that analyzes the influence of three types of linguistic features (n-grams, word embeddings, and polarity lexicons) and their combinations when they are used to feed different supervised machine learning classifiers: Support Vector Machine (SVM), Naive Bayes (NB), and Decision Tree (DT).

Subject Areas

sentiment analysis; opinion mining; linguistic features; classification; very negative opinions

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.