Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Scope of Artificial Intelligence in Law

Jyoti Dabass
* and
Bhupender Singh Dabass
*
Version 1 : Received: 28 June 2018 / Approved: 28 June 2018 / Online: 28 June 2018 (15:13:31 CEST)

How to cite: Dabass, J.; Dabass, B.S. Scope of Artificial Intelligence in Law. Preprints 2018, 2018060474. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201806.0474.v1 Dabass, J.; Dabass, B.S. Scope of Artificial Intelligence in Law. Preprints 2018, 2018060474. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201806.0474.v1

Abstract

Over the years, artificial intelligence (AI) is spreading its roots in different areas by utilizing the concept of making the computers learn and handle complex tasks that previously require substantial laborious tasks by human beings. With better accuracy and speed, AI is helping lawyers to streamline work processing. New legal AI software tools like Catalyst, Ross intelligence, and Matlab along with natural language processing provide effective quarrel resolution, better legal clearness, and superior admittance to justice and fresh challenges to conventional law firms providing legal services using leveraged cohort correlate model. This paper discusses current applications of legal AI and suggests deep learning and machine learning techniques that can be applied in future to simplify the cumbersome legal tasks.

Keywords

Legal artificial Intelligence; Machine Learning; Deep Learning; Image Processing; Matlab

Subject

Social Sciences, Law

Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Download PDF

Comments (1)

Importance: How significant is the paper to the field?
Outstanding/highlight paper
100%
Significant contribution
0%
Incremental contribution
0%
No contribution
0%
Soundness of evidence/arguments presented:
Conclusions well supported
100%
Most conclusions supported (minor revision needed)
0%
Incomplete evidence (major revision needed)
0%
Hypothesis, unsupported conclusions, or proof-of-principle
0%
Comment 1
Received: 23 August 2018
The commenter has declared there is no conflict of interests.
Comment: Helpful for researchers related to law and artificial intelligence
+ Respond to this comment

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 1
Metrics 0
Get PDF Cite Share 0
Bookmark BibSonomy Mendeley Reddit Delicious
×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.