Article
Version 1
Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed
Preprints as a Hub for Early-Stage Research Outputs
Version 1
: Received: 14 June 2018 / Approved: 15 June 2018 / Online: 15 June 2018 (05:19:00 CEST)
How to cite: Rittman, M. Preprints as a Hub for Early-Stage Research Outputs. Preprints 2018, 2018060243. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201806.0243.v1. Rittman, M. Preprints as a Hub for Early-Stage Research Outputs. Preprints 2018, 2018060243. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201806.0243.v1.
Abstract
This paper explores whether preprints can better support open science by providing links to other early-stage research outputs. This potentially has benefits for transparency and discoverability of research projects. By looking at preprint submission systems, online preprints and surveying those who run preprint servers, I examined to what extent this is currently possible. No preprints server provided a complete service, however many allowed the linking of several open science elements from the abstract page. I looked at variation based on subject, age, and size of preprint server. In conclusion, authors posting preprints should consider the options provided by different preprint servers. It appears that open science is just one focus of preprint servers and further improvements will be dependent on preprint server policies and priorities rather than overcoming any technical difficulties.
Supplementary and Associated Material
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1196772: Supporting data
Keywords
preprints; open science; data; academic publishing
Subject
SOCIAL SCIENCES, Other
Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Comments (3)
We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.
Leave a public commentSend a private comment to the author(s)
Commenter:
Commenter's Conflict of Interests: The author is Director of preprints.org and a full-time employee of MDPI.
Commenter:
The commenter has declared there is no conflict of interests.
Different research areas often have different requirements for the preprint infrastructure. Therefore, what ways could you improve the current investigation to account for such differences? For example, one would expect the infrastructure of ChemXrv to be different to Earthxrv due to the differences in datasets they handle.
Furthermore, what were the differences in infrastructure between multidisciplinary preprints such as Preprints.org and some multidisciplinary OSF preprints.
Commenter:
Commenter's Conflict of Interests: I am the author of the article, Director of preprints.org, and a full-time employee of MDPI which operates preprints.org.
Regarding the differences between specific multidisciplinary preprint servers, given my conflict of interest, I didn't think it would be appropriate to make very direct comparisons. I made some general comments about the OSF projects setup, which is certainly unique as things stand. I'm aware of at least one forthcoming review on the preprint server space, perhaps it will be covered there.