Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Body Mass, Total Body Fat and Visceral Fat Percentage Predict Insulin Resistance Better Than Waist Circumference and Body Mass Index in Healthy Young Male Adult in Indonesia

Version 1 : Received: 25 February 2018 / Approved: 28 February 2018 / Online: 28 February 2018 (04:43:50 CET)

How to cite: Kurniawan, L.B.; Bahrun, U.; Hatta, M.; Arif, M. Body Mass, Total Body Fat and Visceral Fat Percentage Predict Insulin Resistance Better Than Waist Circumference and Body Mass Index in Healthy Young Male Adult in Indonesia. Preprints 2018, 2018020187. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201802.0187.v1 Kurniawan, L.B.; Bahrun, U.; Hatta, M.; Arif, M. Body Mass, Total Body Fat and Visceral Fat Percentage Predict Insulin Resistance Better Than Waist Circumference and Body Mass Index in Healthy Young Male Adult in Indonesia. Preprints 2018, 2018020187. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201802.0187.v1

Abstract

The incidence of obesity which leads to insulin resistance (IR) and metabolic disorder increases in developing countries including Indonesia. Male adult has higher risk to have abdominal obesity than female which is associated with cardiometabolic disorders. Several anthropometric measurements have been proposed to predict IR. The aim of this study was to investigate whether body mass, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), body fat percentage (BF) or visceral fat percentage (VF) could become a better predictor of IR in healthy young male adult. Total of 140 healthy young male adults ranging from 18-25 years were recruited in the study. Insulin resistance was measured by calculating Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR). Subjects with HOMA-IR value >75th percentile with cut off 3.75 were defined as IR. Anthropometric measurements included body weight, BMI, WC were performed whereas BF and VC were measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). IR had significant strong correlation with body weight, BMI, WC, BF and VF. The area under curve of body mass, BF, VF were greater than WC and BMI. Anthropometric measurements correlated strongly with IR but body weight, BF, VF have stronger correlation than WC and BMI in healthy young male adult.

Keywords

insulin resistance; body weight; body fat; visceral fat; waist circumference; body mass index

Subject

Medicine and Pharmacology, Endocrinology and Metabolism

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.