Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed
Development of Understanding Zero
: Received: 24 August 2017 / Approved: 25 August 2017 / Online: 25 August 2017 (12:28:23 CEST)
: Received: 16 July 2020 / Approved: 16 July 2020 / Online: 16 July 2020 (12:35:17 CEST)
A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.
Journal reference: Frontiers in Psychology 2021
While the knowledge about the development of understanding positive integers is rapidly growing, the development of understanding zero is not well-known. Here we tested several components of preschoolers’ understanding zero: whether they can use empty sets in numerical tasks, whether they can use empty sets as soon as they understand the cardinality principle, whether they know what the word “zero” refers to, and whether they categorize zero as a number. The results show that preschoolers can handle empty sets in numerical tasks as soon as they understand the cardinality principle or even earlier, and some of them know that these sets are labeled as “zero.” However, they are unsure whether zero is a number. We argue that preschoolers might understand numbers as the properties of items or objects in a set. In this view, zero cannot be a number, because an empty set does not include any items, and the missing items cannot have any property, excluding also the number property. This model might explain why zero is handled correctly in numerical tasks, while it is not regarded to be a number.
Supplementary and Associated Material
numerical cognition; zero; number status of zero; items based number representation
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our diversity statement.