Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Reshuffling the Risk Factors of Severe Early Childhood Caries

Noha Kabil
* and
Sherif Eltaweil
Version 1 : Received: 1 November 2016 / Approved: 1 November 2016 / Online: 1 November 2016 (06:56:46 CET)
Version 2 : Received: 3 November 2016 / Approved: 3 November 2016 / Online: 3 November 2016 (08:39:30 CET)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Kabil, N.S.; Eltawil, S. Prioritizing the Risk Factors of Severe Early Childhood Caries. Dent. J. 2017, 5, 4. Kabil, N.S.; Eltawil, S. Prioritizing the Risk Factors of Severe Early Childhood Caries. Dent. J. 2017, 5, 4.

Abstract

Severe early childhood caries remains the most common chronic disease affecting children. .Its multifactorial etiology lead to the controversy about which risk factors were more significant to its development. Therefore our study aimed through meticulous statistical analysis to arrange the “well agreed upon” common risk factors in order of significance to aid the clinician in tailoring an adequate preventive program for this affected age group. The study concluded that the risk factors contributing to severe early childhood caries in order of their significance were Night feeding, On demand feeding, Mother’s Employment, Mother’s caries Experience, Starting age of brushing, Mother’s education, Sharing utensils, Child’s first dental visit, Number of siblings, Brushing frequency, Sweetened food and beverage consumption, Sweetened beverages, and at last the snacking frequency.

Keywords

severe early childhood caries; risk factors

Subject

Medicine and Pharmacology, Dentistry and Oral Surgery

Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Download PDF

Comments (12)

Importance: How significant is the paper to the field?
Outstanding/highlight paper
40%
Significant contribution
60%
Incremental contribution
0%
No contribution
0%
Soundness of evidence/arguments presented:
Conclusions well supported
90%
Most conclusions supported (minor revision needed)
10%
Incomplete evidence (major revision needed)
0%
Hypothesis, unsupported conclusions, or proof-of-principle
0%
Comment 1
Received: 1 November 2016
Commenter: Nadia. Ezeldin Metwalli
The commenter has declared there is no conflict of interests.
Comment:
  • textwell written ,easy to read, results show importance of subject in the community
    • + Respond to this comment
    Comment 2
    Received: 1 November 2016
    Commenter: Nada Atef Aboushady
    The commenter has declared there is no conflict of interests.
    Comment: Quite fruitfull article, simple for the reader to get the information in need
    + Respond to this comment
    Comment 3
    Received: 1 November 2016
    Commenter: Reem Mahmoud Abdelkader
    The commenter has declared there is no conflict of interests.
    Comment: Informative paper with a good trending topic done with accurate screening ... a mix of graphs and tables are needed though...
    + Respond to this comment
    Comment 4
    Received: 1 November 2016
    Commenter: Sara Magdy Abdel Hakiem
    The commenter has declared there is no conflict of interests.
    Comment: This article added a lot to the risk factors associated with S-ECC, it is written in a simple way and to the point.
    + Respond to this comment
    Comment 5
    Received: 2 November 2016
    Commenter: Basma Gamal
    The commenter has declared there is no conflict of interests.
    Comment: A very attractive title that attracts the readers from the very first few words... The paper is very informative and simple to understand and well written and it has covered an important subject that has a high impact on pediatric dentistry.
    + Respond to this comment
    Comment 6
    Received: 2 November 2016
    Commenter: Farah Barakat
    The commenter has declared there is no conflict of interests.
    Comment: A good study covering all points of conflict and results are well supported.
    + Respond to this comment
    Comment 7
    Received: 2 November 2016
    Commenter: Ahmed Essam Ali Gaber Khalil
    The commenter has declared there is no conflict of interests.
    Comment: well designed study, easy to understand, the methodology is accurate however more number of examiners is needed
    + Respond to this comment
    Comment 8
    Received: 2 November 2016
    Commenter: gehan gaber allam
    The commenter has declared there is no conflict of interests.
    Comment: very important subject,results is well presented and well presented diagrams but I think sample size need to be increased a little bit.
    + Respond to this comment
    Response 1 to Comment 8
    Received: 3 November 2016
    Commenter: Noha Kabil
    The commenter has declared there is no conflict of interests.
    Comment: MThank u for your comment
    Power of the study equation was used to statistically estimate sample size
    Comment 9
    Received: 2 November 2016
    Commenter: salma mortagy
    The commenter has declared there is no conflict of interests.
    Comment: very well presented paper with all the details to an extent that the discussion is considered a little bit long but because it covered all the information needed
    + Respond to this comment
    Comment 10
    Received: 2 November 2016
    Commenter: Rana Mohamed Sharaf
    The commenter has declared there is no conflict of interests.
    Comment: Very attractive title and interesting topic. The results are informantive. However i would have preferred that the materials and methods were before the results.
    + Respond to this comment
    Response 1 to Comment 10
    Received: 4 November 2016
    Commenter: Noha kabil
    The commenter has declared there is no conflict of interests.
    Comment: Thank unfor ur comment. I adjusted in version 2

    We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

    Leave a public comment
    Send a private comment to the author(s)
    * All users must log in before leaving a comment
    Views 0
    Downloads 0
    Comments 12
    Metrics 0
    Get PDF Cite Share 0
    Bookmark BibSonomy Mendeley Reddit Delicious
    ×
    Alerts
    Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
    We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
    Read more about our cookies here.