Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Propositions for Confidence Interval in Systematic Sampling on Real Line

Version 1 : Received: 2 August 2016 / Approved: 2 August 2016 / Online: 2 August 2016 (11:07:53 CEST)
Version 2 : Received: 16 August 2016 / Approved: 16 August 2016 / Online: 16 August 2016 (11:39:57 CEST)
Version 3 : Received: 9 September 2016 / Approved: 9 September 2016 / Online: 9 September 2016 (11:52:36 CEST)
Version 4 : Received: 14 September 2016 / Approved: 15 September 2016 / Online: 15 September 2016 (05:18:42 CEST)

How to cite: Çankaya, M.N. Propositions for Confidence Interval in Systematic Sampling on Real Line. Preprints 2016, 2016080017. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201608.0017.v1 Çankaya, M.N. Propositions for Confidence Interval in Systematic Sampling on Real Line. Preprints 2016, 2016080017. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201608.0017.v1

Abstract

Systematic sampling on real line (R) when using the different probes is very attractive method within which the biomedical imaging is consulted by a surgery, etc. This study is an extension of [16], and an exact calculation method is proposed for the calculation of constant λq of confidence interval for the systematic sampling. If the smoothness constant q of measurement function occurred by slicing the three dimensional object is estimated to be enough small mean square error, we can make the important remarks for the design-based stereology used as a method to get the quantitative results from the tissues and the radiological images. Synthetic data can support the results of real data. The currently used covariogram model proposed by [28] is tested for the different measurement functions to see the performance on the variance estimation. The exact value of constant λq is examined for the different measurement functions as well.

Keywords

biomedical imaging; covariogram; design-based stereology; estimation of volume; systematic sampling

Subject

Computer Science and Mathematics, Applied Mathematics

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.