Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes increase risks for breast, ovarian, and other cancers. Both genes encode proteins for accurately repairing chromosome breaks. If mutations inactivate this function, broken chromosomes may not be restored correctly, allowing breaks to persist or rearrange chromosomes. These abnormalities are potentially catastrophic events that can originate from viral infections. I used bioinformatic analyses of publicly available breast cancer patient data to show that the distribution of chromosome breaks in hereditary breast cancers differs markedly from sporadic breast cancers. Then I tested hereditary breast cancer sequence data around chromosome breaks for DNA similarity to all known viruses. Human DNA flanking breakpoints usually had decisive matches to Epstein-Barr virus (EBV / HHV4) tumor variants HKHD40 and HKNPC60. Many breakpoints were near EBV genome anchor sites, human EBV tumor-like sequences, EBV-associated epigenetic marks, and some fragile sites. On chromosomes 2 and 12, sequences near EBV genome anchor sites accounted for 90% and 88% of breakpoints (p<0.0001), respectively. On chromosome 4, 51/52 inter-chromosomal breakpoints were close to EBV-like sequences in 19 hereditary breast cancers. In contrast, 19 sporadic breast cancers only had 12 interchromosomal breakpoint regions on chromosome 4 near EBV-like sequences. On various other chromosomes, five EBV genome anchor sites were near hereditary breast cancer breakpoints at precisely defined, disparate gene or LINE locations. Independent evidence further implicating EBV in hereditary breast cancer breakpoints is that 25 breast cancer break positions are within 1.25% of breakpoints in model EBV cancers. In addition to BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, all the hereditary breast cancers had mutated genes essential for immune responses. This compromise facilitates reactivation of herpes viruses which produce nucleases capable of breaking chromosomes. EBV also causes other deleterious effects: anchored EBV episomes can interfere with normal replication and obstruct DNA break repairs; even very early infection causes massive transcription changes. The results, therefore, imply proactive treatment and prevention of herpes viral infections may prevent some chromosome breaks and benefit BRCA mutation carriers.

Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes increase risks for breast, ovarian, and other cancers. Both genes encode proteins for accurately repairing chromosome breaks. If mutations inactivate this function, chromosome fragments may not be restored correctly. Resulting chromosome rearrangements can become critical breast cancer drivers. Because I had data from thousands of cancer structural alterations that matched viral infections, I wondered whether infections contribute to chromosome breaks and rearrangements in hereditary breast cancers. There are currently no interventions to prevent chromosome breaks because they are thought to be unavoidable. However, if chromosome breaks come from infections, they can be treated or prevented. I used bioinformatic analyses to test publicly available breast cancer sequence data around chromosome breaks for DNA similarity to all known viruses. Human DNA flanking breakpoints usually had the strongest matches to Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) tumor variants HKHD40 and HKNPC60. Many breakpoints were near sites that anchor EBV genomes, human EBV tumor-like sequences, EBV-associated epigenetic marks, and fragile sites. On chromosome 2, sequences near EBV genome anchor sites accounted for 90% of breakpoints (p<0.0001). On chromosome 4, 51/52 inter-chromosomal breakpoints were close to EBV-like sequences. Five EBV genome anchor sites were near breast cancer breakpoints at precisely defined, disparate gene or LINE locations. Breakpoint flanking regions resembled known EBV-cancers. Twenty-five breakpoints in breast cancers were within 1.25% of EBV cancer breakpoints. In addition to BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, all the breast cancers had mutated genes essential for immune responses. Because of this immune compromise, herpes viruses can activate and produce nucleases that break chromosomes. Alternatively, anchored viral episomes can obstruct break repairs, whatever the cause. The results, therefore, imply proactive treatment and prevention of herpes viral infections may prevent some chromosome breaks and benefit BRCA mutation carriers.

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to understand the role of infection in the origin of chromosomal anomalies linked to neurodevelopmental disorders. In patients with neurodevelopmental disorders, DNA’s from viruses and bacteria including known teratogens were tested against chromosome anomalies known to cause the disorders. Results support a theory that parental infections disrupt elaborate multi-system gene coordination needed for neurodevelopment. Genes essential for neurons, lymphatic drainage, immunity, circulation, angiogenesis, barriers, structure, and chromatin activity were all found close together in polyfunctional clusters that were deleted in neurodevelopmental disorders. These deletions account for immune, circulatory, and structural deficits that accompany neurologic deficits. In deleted clusters, specific and repetitive human DNA matched infections and passed rigorous artifact tests. In some patients, epigenetic driver mutations were found and may be functionally equivalent to deleting a cluster or changing topologic chromatin interactions because they change access to large chromosome segments. In three families, deleted DNA sequences were associated with intellectual deficits and were not included in any database of genomic variants. These sequences were thousands of bp and unequivocally matched foreign DNAs. Analogous homologies were also found in chromosome anomalies of a recurrent neurodevelopmental disorder. Viral and bacterial DNAs that match repetitive or specific human DNA segments are thus proposed to interfere with highly active break repair during meiosis, and sometimes delete polyfunctional clusters, and disable epigenetic drivers. Mis-repaired gametes produce zygotes containing rare chromosome anomalies which cause neurologic disorders and accompanying non-neurologic signs. Neurodevelopmental disorders may be examples of assault on the human genome by foreign DNA with some infections more likely tolerated because they resemble human DNA segments. Further tests of this model await new technology.