Most IoT systems meant for implementing mission-critical systems are multi-layered based. The majority of the computing is done in the services and gateway layer. The Gateway layer connects the Internal section of the IoT to the cloud through the Internet. The failure of any node between the services servers and the gateways will isolate the entire network leading to zero tolerance. A networking topology is required to connect the service servers to the gateways, yielding 100% fault tolerance. Empirical formulation of the model chosen to connect the service’s servers to gateways through routers is required to compute the fault tolerance of the network. Rectangular and Interstitial Mesh have been proposed in this paper to connect the service servers to the gateways through the servers that yield 0.999 fault tolerance of the IoT network. An empirical formulation is also presented using which the Fault tolerance of the IoT network can be computed. An enhancement of 11% in the fault tolerance capability of an IoT network has been achieved by implementing Rectangular and Interstitial Mesh in the gateway layer of the network.

The main channel for disseminating information is now the Internet. Users have different expectations for the calibre of websites regarding the posted and presented content. The WEB site's quality is influenced by up to 120 factors, each represented by two to fifteen attributes. A major challenge is quantifying the features and evaluating the quality of a website based on the feature counts. One of the aspects that determines a website's quality is its completeness, which focuses on the existence of all the objects and their connections with one another. It isn’t easy to build an expert model based on feature counts to evaluate website quality, so this paper has focused on that challenge. Both a methodology for calculating a website's quality and a parser-based approach for measuring feature counts are offered. We provide a multi-layer perceptron model that is an expert model for forecasting website quality from the "Completeness" perspective. The accuracy of the predictions is 98%, whilst the accuracy of the nearest model is 87%.