Submitted:
16 October 2026
Posted:
16 October 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
We introduce the novel concept of weighted EP elements with respect to two elements in a ring to establish a unified framework that naturally generalizes classical EP elements. We then characterize the fundamental properties of weighted EP elements, demonstrating that many classical properties extend to this general setting with two weights. The relations among the weighted EP element, the weighted group inverse, the weighted core inverse, and the weighted Moore-Penrose inverse are thereby established.
Keywords:
EP element
; weighted EP element
; weighted core inverse
; weighted Moore-Penrose inverse
; complex matrix
MSC: 16U90; 15A09; 16W10
1. Introduction
Let R be a ring with involution *. An element a in R is an EP element if there exists some such that (see [15]). Let be the ring of all complex matrices with conjugate transpose *. Evidently, is an EP matrix if and only if if and only if . EP elements are a specialized class of elements within ring and algebra, characterized by a specific relationship between the element and its Moore-Penrose inverse or generalized inverses in structured settings such as rings, Banach algebras and -algebras. EP elements in a ring and algebra are expensively studied by many authors. Their study bridges abstract algebra and operator theory, with applications in matrix analysis, functional analysis, and beyond (see [1,3,5,6,7,8,9,10,13,14,16,18,20,21]).
Zhu et al. introduced and studied w-core inverse for a ring element (see [22]). Let . An element has w-core inverse if there exists such that If such x exists, it is unique, and denote it by . Let denote the set of all w-core invertible elements in R. We refer the reader to [11,19] for more results on the w-core inverse. Following Lu, an element is a w-EP element if there exists such that and . Let denote the set of all w-EP elements in R. Evidently, if and only if and (see [12][Theorem 2.10 and Theorem 2.12]).
Let . We consider the solution of a system of equations involving , which aims to extend EP and w-EP elements to a broader class of elements with two weights. We adopt
Definition 1.1.
An element is a -weighted EP element if there exists such that
In Section 2, we present the fundamental properties of -weighted EP elements. Let be the set of all -weighted EP elements in R. We prove that if and only if there exists such that , if and only if there exists a projection (i..e., ) such that
Here, denotes the set of all invertible elements in R.
Definition 1.2.
An element has -weighted group inverse if there exists such that
The preceding x is unique if it exists, and we denote it by .
The set of all -weighted group invertible elements in R is denoted by .
Definition 1.3.
An element is -weighted MP invertible if there exists such that
We use to stand for the set of all -weighted MP invertible elements in R. In Section 3, we provide characterizations of -weighted EP elements in terms of related images. It is shown that if and only if and , and respectively, if and only if and .
Finally, Section 4 further explore -weighted EP elements via its weighted MP invertibility, proving that if and only if and for some . These elements are also characterized using related weighted core inverse.
2. Weighted EP Elements
The aim of this section is to present fundamental properties of weighted EP elements in a ring. We begin with
Theorem 2.1.
Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
- .
- (2)
- There exists such that
Proof. By hypothesis, there exists such that
Then . Moreover, we have
as required.
By hypothesis, there exists such that
Then . This implies that by [16][Lemma 2.1]. Hence and , as required. □
Corollary 2.2.
Let . Then if and only if there exists such that .
Proof.
⟹ Set . Then . Moreover, we see that , as required.
⟸ By hypothesis, we have such that . Furthermore, we have Thus we check that
By virtue of Theorem 2.1, . □
We are ready to prove:
Theorem 2.3.
Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
- .
- (2)
- There exists such that
Proof. By hypothesis, there exists such that
Hence, . Moreover, we check that , as required.
By hypothesis, there exists such that
Suppose that there exists such that
In view of [16][Lemma 2.1], . Hence,
Likewise, we have . Then
Therefore .
We check that
By the uniqueness of x, we obtain
Therefore . □
Corollary 2.4.(see [18][Theorem 2.7 and Theorem 2.11]) Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
- .
- (2)
- There exists such that
- (3)
- There exists such that
Proof.
This is obvious by choosing in Theorem 2.3. □
Theorem 2.5.
Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
- .
- (2)
- There exists such that
- (3)
- There exists such that
Proof. Let . Obviously, we have and as desired.
Let . Then . By hypothesis, , as desired.
By hypothesis, there exists such that
Then . In view of [16][Lemma 2.1], we have Hence , and so
Let . Then
Therefore by Theorem 2.1. □
Corollary 2.6.
Let and . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
- .
- (2)
- There exists such that
Proof.
This is proved by Theorem 2.5 and [16][Theorem 2.3]. □
Theorem 2.7.
Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
- .
- (2)
- There exists such that .
Proof. By hypothesis, there exists such that . Thus , as required.
By hypothesis, we deduce that
Hence . Moreover, we have
Hence, . Therefore we complete the proof. □
Recall that an element has -weighted core inverse if there exists such that Let be the set of all -weighted core invertible elements in R.
Corollary 2.8.
Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
- .
- (2)
- There exists such that
Proof. Set . By hypothesis, we verify that
Therefore , as desired.
Set . Then . Since , we have . Accordingly, we obtain the result. □
As is well known, every EP element possess the polar-like property, i.e., there exists a projection such that (see [18][Theorem 3.2]). We next extend this result and establish the polar-like property of weighted EP elements.
Theorem 2.9.
Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
- .
- (2)
- There exists a projection such that
Proof. Set and . Then . Moreover, we check that
as required.
By hypothesis, there exists a projection such that
Set . Then . Write with . Then
Therefore . □
Corollary 2.10.
Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
- .
- (2)
- and , where
Proof. Since , we deduce that
as required.
Clearly, . Moreover, we check that
Therefore we obtain the result by Theorem 2.9. □
3. Image-Based Characterizations
In this section, we establish certain equivalent conditions on weighted group elements to be the weighted EP element. We now derive
Theorem 3.1.
Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
- .
- (2)
- and .
- (3)
- and .
Proof. Clearly, . Since , we have . As , we see that ; whence, . Therefore .
This is trivial.
Set . Then and . Write for a . Then . We easily see that ; hence, . Thus , and so . We deduce that ; whence . Then . Clearly, and . Therefore . □
Corollary 3.2.
Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
- .
- (2)
- and .
- (3)
- and .
Proof. Obviously, . Since , we have . As , it follows that , and then . We infer that , as required.
This is trivial.
Since . This completes the proof by Theorem 3.1. □
Corollary 3.3.
Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
- .
- (2)
- and .
- (3)
- and .
Proof. Clearly, . By virtue of Theorem 3.1, .
This is clear.
By hypothesis, there exists such that Set . Then we verify that
This implies that . Therefore we complete the proof by Theorem 3.1. □
Theorem 3.4.
Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
- .
- (2)
- and .
- (3)
- and .
Proof. Obviously, . By virtue of Corollary 3.3, .
Set . Then we have and . Since , we see that . As , we have , and so .
As , we get . Then . This implies that . Therefore . Accordingly, we deduce that
as required.
Clearly, . Set . Then . Hence, . Thus, , as asserted. □
We use to stand the commutator of x and y, i.e., . We derive
Corollary 3.5.
Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
- .
- (2)
- There exists such that .
Proof. This is obvious.
Since , we see that . Clearly, . On the other hand, we have
Therefore , thus yielding the result by Theorem 3.4. □
Lemma 3.6.
Let . Then .
Proof.
By hypothesis, we can find such that Then □
We use and to denote the left and right annihilator of x in R, respectively. We deduce that
Theorem 3.7.
Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
- .
- (2)
- There exists such that
- (3)
- There exists such that
- (4)
- There exists such that
- (5)
- There exists such that
Proof. Let . In view of Theorem 2.1 and Theorem 2.7, Hence, and . This implies that . By virtue of Lemma 3.6, , and so . Since , we have . Therefore .
If for , then . If for , then . Hence . Likewise, we have as desired.
Since , we have , and then . Hence , and so . This implies that ; and then . We infer that ; whence, . Therefore . As , we have . it follows that . Then , i.e., . Thus .
Since , we have ; hence, . This implies that ; whence . Then . We infer that . It follows that . Therefore by Theorem 2.7.
By virtue of Lemma 3.6, . As in the argument above, we prove that as required.
This is obvious.
This is similar to the discussion in . □
Corollary 3.8.
Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
- .
- (2)
- There exists such that
- (3)
- There exists such that
- (4)
- There exists such that
- (5)
- There exists such that
Proof.
This is obvious by choosing in Theorem 3.7. □
4. Association with Related Generalized Inverses
The goal of this section is to characterize weighted EP elements by using the related weight Moore-Penrose invertibility. We come now to the demonstration for which this section has been developed.
Theorem 4.1.
Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
- .
- (2)
- There exists such that for some .
Proof. Set . As in the proof of Theorem 3.4, we see that . Let . Then Likewise, . Hence, . We verify that
as required.
By hypothesis, there exists some such that . Then
Hence
On the other hand, we have
Therefore . By virtue of Theorem 3.4, , as asserted. □
Corollary 4.2.( [18][Theorem 3.12]) Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
- .
- (2)
- and for some .
Proof.
This is obtained by choosing in Theorem 4.1. □
Lemma 4.3.
Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
- .
- (2)
- There exist and such that .
Proof. In view of Theorem 3.1 and Theorem 3.4, . Moreover, we have .
Since , we see that . This complete the proof by Corollary 2.2. □
Theorem 4.4.
Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
- .
- (2)
- There exist and such that .
- (3)
- There exist and such that .
Proof. In view of Lemma 4.3, and . Thus, as required.
It is easy to verify that , and then .
Set . Then we have
By hypothesis, we have Hence
According to Theorem 2.7, we prove that , as asserted. □
Lemma 4.5.
Let and . if and only if
- (1)
- ;
- (2)
- there exists such that .
Proof. Obviously, . Choose . Then . Moreover, we see that . Then . That is,
If , then by Corollary 3.5.
If , then there exists such that . Hence, , and then
This implies that
Since , we deduce that . Thus . By virtue of Corollary 2.2, , as asserted. □
Theorem 4.6.
Let and . Then if and only if
- (1)
- ;
- (2)
- there exists such that .
Proof. Clearly, . In view of Lemma 4.3, we have
Then .
By hypothesis, we have
i..e.,
Thus, we derive
Accordingly, we have
Since , we deduce that
Therefore . That is, . In light of Lemma 4.5, , as asserted. □
Corollary 4.7.
Let . Then if and only if
- (1)
- ;
- (2)
- there exists such that .
Proof.
This is obvious by choosing in Theorem 4.6. □
We come now to characterize the weighted EP element by using the core inverse with two weights.
Theorem 4.8.
Let . Then if and only if and there exists such that
- (1)
- ;
- (2)
- .
Proof.
⟹ By virtue of Theorem 3.1, . Choose . Then and we further verify that
Therefore , as required.
⟸ By hypothesis, we have and . It follows from that . Therefore we complete the proof by Corollary 2.2. □
Corollary 4.9.
Let . Then if and only if and there exists such that and .
Proof.
This is immediate by choosing in Theorem 4.8. □
Theorem 4.10.
Let . Then if and only if and there exists such that
- (1)
- ;
- (2)
- .
Proof.
⟹ Set . Then . We verify that
Accordingly, , as desired.
⟸ By hypothesis, we have and . It is easy to verify that , and then . In light of Corollary 2.2, , as asserted. □
Corollary 4.11.
Let . Then if and only if and there exists such that and .
Proof.
This is obvious by choosing in Theorem 4.10. □
Theorem 4.12.
Let . Then if and only if and there exists such that
- (1)
- ;
- (2)
- .
Proof.
⟹ By virtue of Theorem 3.1 and Theorem 3.4, . Set . One directly checks that
Therefore .
⟸ By the assumption, there exists such that
Since , we deduce that . This completes the proof by Corollary 2.2. □
As an immediate consequence, we derive
Corollary 4.13.
Let . Then if and only if and there exists such that and .
Note that each element in the set can be viewed as the element x in Theorem 4.8, Theorem 4.10 and Theorem 4.12.
References
- Boasso, E. Factorizations of EP Banach space operators and EP Banach algebra elements. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2011, 379, 245–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, L.; Wei, J. Characterizations of EP elements via w-core inverses. Filomat 2025, 39, 8737–8745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.; Sheibani, M. New additive properties of EP elements in a ring with involution. Commun. Algebra 2025, 53, 3881–3891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J.; Zhu, H.; Patricio, P.; Zhang, Y. Characterizations and representations of core and dual core inverses. Canad. Math. Bull. 2017, 60, 269–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, W. On EP elements, normal elements and partial isometries in rings with involution. Electron. J. Linear Algebra 2012, 23, 553–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Djordjević, D.S. Products of EP operators on Hilbert spaces. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 2000, 129, 1727–1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Djordjević, D.S. Characterization of normal, hyponormal and EP operators. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2007, 329, 1181–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Djordjević, D.S.; Koliha, J.J. Characterizing Hermitian, normal and EP operators. Filomat 2007, 21, 39–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Djordjević, D.S.; Koliha, J.J.; Straksraba, I. Factorization of EP elements in C*-algebras. Linear Multilinear Algebra 2009, 57, 587–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, T.; Li, J.; Wang, Q.; Wei, J. Some new characterizations of EP elements, partial isometries and strongly EP elements in rings with involution. Georgian Math. J. 2023, 30, 445–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, T.; Zhu, H.; Wu, L. New characterizations for w-core inverses in rings with involution. Filomat 2023, 37, 2131–2139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, Q.; Shi, S.; Wang, L. The complete w-core inverse in semigroups. Filomat 2026, 40, 1045–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mary, X.; Patrício, P. When is a product of EP elements again EP? Linear Multilinear Algebra 2026, 74, 242–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mosić, D.; S, D.; Djordjevic. Partial isometries and EP elements in rings with involution. Electron. J. Linear Algebra 2009, 18, 761–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mosić, D.; S, D.; Djordjevic; Koliha, J.J. EP elements in rings. Linear Algebra Appl. 2009, 4319, 527–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Mosic, D.; Gao, Y. New results on EP elements in rings with involution. Algebra Colloq. 2022, 29, 39–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, S.; Chen, J. The Moore-Penrose inverse in rings with involution. Filomat 2019, 33, 5791–5802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, S.; Chen, J.; Benítez, J. EP elements in rings with involution. Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc. 2019, 42, 3409–3426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Q.; Wang, C.; Zhu, H. Characterizations and representations of w-core inverses in rings. Filomat 2023, 37, 3183–3190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, R.; Wei, J. Special Sylvester equations, PI and EP elements in rings with involution. J. Algebra Appl. Article ID 2450204, 12 p. 2024, 23(No. 12). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, H.; Li, A.; Wei, J. Characterizations of EP elements in rings with involution. Filomat 2022, 36, 5813–5820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, H.; Wu, L.; Chen, J. A new class of generalized inverses in semigroups and rings with involution. Commun. Algebra 2023, 51, 2098–2113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.