Preprint
Short Note

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Non-Archimedean Smale Mean Value and Dubinin–Sugawa Dual Mean Value Problems

Submitted:

01 October 2026

Posted:

02 October 2026

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Motivated by the Smale mean value and the Dubinin–Sugawa dual mean value theorems, we formulate non-Archimedean Smale mean value and Dubinin–Sugawa dual mean value problems. We show that if a universal constant satisfying the non-Archimedean Smale mean value problem exists, it must be greater than or equal to one and if a universal constant satisfying the non-Archimedean Dubinin–Sugawa dual mean value problem exists, it must be less than or equal to one. We also derive other bounds whenever roots of unity exist in a non-Archimedean field.
Keywords: 
;  ;  

1. Introduction

In 1981, Steve Smale proved the following result using the Koebe 1/4-theorem [1].
Theorem 1.
[1] (Smale Mean Value Theorem) Let P ( z ) : = a 0 + a 1 z + a 2 z 2 + ⋯ + a n z n be a polynomial of degree n ≥ 2 over C . If z ∈ C is not a critical point of P (i.e., P ′ ( z ) ≠ 0 ), then
min w ∈ C , P ′ ( w ) = 0 P ( z ) − P ( w ) z − w ≤ 4 | P ′ ( z ) | .
Note that Theorem 1 can also be stated as follows.
Theorem 2.
[1] (Smale Mean Value Theorem) Let P ( z ) : = a 0 + a 1 z + a 2 z 2 + ⋯ + a n z n be a polynomial of degree n ≥ 2 over C . If z ∈ C is not a critical point of P, then there exists a critical point w ∈ C of P such that
P ( z ) − P ( w ) z − w ≤ 4 | P ′ ( z ) | .
The proof of Theorem 2 can also be found in books [2,3]. Inequality (1) led Smale to ask the following problem. What is the best constant 4 > c > 0 such that the Inequality (1) can be replaced by
min w ∈ C , P ′ ( w ) = 0 P ( z ) − P ( w ) z − w ≤ c | P ′ ( z ) | ?
Smale made the following conjecture with regard to Inequality (3), which remains open today.
Conjecture 3.
[1,4,5,6,7,8] (Smale Mean Value Conjecture) Let P ( z ) : = a 0 + a 1 z + a 2 z 2 + ⋯ + a n z n be a polynomial of degree n ≥ 2 over C . If z ∈ C is not a critical point of P, then
min w ∈ C , P ′ ( w ) = 0 P ( z ) − P ( w ) z − w ≤ 1 | P ′ ( z ) |
or
min w ∈ C , P ′ ( w ) = 0 P ( z ) − P ( w ) z − w ≤ n − 1 n | P ′ ( z ) | = deg ( P ) − 1 deg ( P ) | P ′ ( z ) | .
By taking polynomial P ( z ) : = z n − n z ∈ C [ z ] , we see that the constant ( n − 1 ) / n in inequality (4) cannot be improved further. Conjecture 3 also appears as Problem 1 in the Addenda after the list of 18 open problems of Smale in Mathematical Problems for the Next Century [5]. Now for a polynomial P of degree n ≥ 2 , define
S ( P ) : = sup z ∈ C , P ′ ( z ) ≠ 0 1 | P ′ ( z ) | min w ∈ C , P ′ ( w ) = 0 P ( z ) − P ( w ) z − w
and
M : = sup P is a non linear polynomial S ( P ) .
Smale conjecture then asks whether M = 1 or S ( P ) = deg ( P ) − 1 deg ( P ) ? It is known that the Conjecture 3 holds for polynomials of degree 2, 3, 4, [2,3,9]. Through computer calculations, Smale conjecture is known to hold for polynomials of degree upto 10 [10].
Usually, the study of Smale mean value conjecture goes with the following conjecture which is known as normalization equivalence to Conjecture 3.
Conjecture 4.
[1,2,3] (Normalized Smale Mean Value Conjecture) Let P be a degree n ≥ 2 polynomial over C which is normalized, i.e., P ( 0 ) = 0 and P ′ ( 0 ) = 1 . Then
S 0 ( P ) : = min w ∈ C , P ′ ( w ) = 0 P ( w ) w = deg ( P ) − 1 deg ( P )
or
M 0 : = sup P is a non linear polynomial , P ( 0 ) = 0 , P ′ ( 0 ) = 1 S 0 ( P ) = 1 .
In 1996, Andrievskii and Ruscheweyh showed that if critical points of a normalized polynomial P lie on the unit circle, then S 0 ( P ) ≤ 1 [11]. In 2009, Hinkkanen and Kayumov showed that if all the critical points of a normalized polynomial P are real, then S 0 ( P ) ≤ 2 3 [12]. In 2010, Hinkkanen and Kayumov proved that if the critical points of normalized polynomial P lie on the sector { r e i θ : r > 0 , | θ | ≤ π / 6 } , then S 0 ( P ) ≤ 1 2 and if the critical points of normalized polynomial P lie in the union of two rays { 1 + r e ± i θ : r ≥ 0 } for each 0 < θ ≤ π / 2 , then S 0 ( P ) ≤ 2 3 [13]. In [2] it is showed that if the critical points of a normalized polynomial are all real, then S 0 ( P ) ≤ deg ( P ) − 2 deg ( P ) deg ( P ) − 1 deg ( P ) − 2 deg ( P ) − 1 − 2 and in [3] it is showed that S 0 ( P ) ≤ e − 2 .
In 2002, Beardon, Minda and Ng showed that S ( P ) ≤ 4 deg ( P ) − 2 deg ( P ) − 1 [14]. In 2006, Fijikawa and Sugawa proved that S ( P ) ≤ 4 1 + ( deg ( P ) − 2 ) 4 − 1 deg ( P ) − 1 deg ( P ) + 1 [15]. In 2007, Conte, Fujikawa and Lakic showed that S ( P ) ≤ 4 deg ( P ) − 1 deg ( P ) + 1 [16]. In 2007, Crane showed that there exists n 0 ≥ 2 such that for all n ≥ n 0 , S ( P ) ≤ 4 − 2 deg ( P ) [17] (also see [18]). In 2003, Ng proved that Conjecture 3 holds with M = 2 for all odd polynomials with nonzero linear terms [19]. In 2006, Dubinin proved that if the critical points of a normalized polynomial P have equal modulus, then S 0 ( P ) ≤ deg ( P ) − 1 deg ( P ) [20].
At the other side, in 2002, Sendov formulated a generalization of Conjecture 3 [21]. In 2003, Sendov and Nikolov gave some variations of Conjecture 3 [22]. In 2005, Tyson showed that Tischler’s strong form of Smale mean value conjecture [9,23] fails [24]. One can interpret Conjecture 3 in the form of finite Blaschke products [3,25,26]. It is also possible to connect Conjecture 3 with electrostatics [27].
In 1981, Smale also derived the following higher order mean value theorem [1].
Theorem 5.
[1] (Higher Order Smale Mean Value Theorem) Let P ( z ) : = a 0 + a 1 z + a 2 z 2 + ⋯ + a n z n be a polynomial of degree n ≥ 2 over C . If z ∈ C is not a critical point of P, then there exists a critical point w ∈ C of P such that
| P ( k ) ( z ) | k ! | P ( z ) − P ( w ) | k − 1 | P ′ ( z ) | k ≤ 4 k − 1 , ∀ 2 ≤ k ≤ n .
In 2009, Dubinin and Sugawa derived the following striking result which is a dual result for Smale mean value theorem [28].
Theorem 6.
[28,29] (Dubinin-Sugawa Dual Mean Value Theorem) Let P ( z ) : = a 0 + a 1 z + a 2 z 2 + ⋯ + a n z n be a polynomial of degree n ≥ 2 over C . If z ∈ C is not a critical point of P, then there exists a critical point w ∈ C of P such that
| P ′ ( z ) | n 4 n ≤ P ( z ) − P ( w ) z − w .
In other words,
| P ′ ( z ) | n 4 n ≤ max w ∈ C , P ′ ( w ) = 0 P ( z ) − P ( w ) z − w .
Dubinin and Sugawa made the following conjecture in 2009 [28].
Conjecture 7.
[28,29] (Dubinin-Sugawa Dual Mean Value Conjecture) Let P ( z ) : = a 0 + a 1 z + a 2 z 2 + ⋯ + a n z n be a polynomial of degree n ≥ 2 over C . If z ∈ C is not a critical point of P, then
| P ′ ( z ) | n ≤ max w ∈ C , P ′ ( w ) = 0 P ( z ) − P ( w ) z − w .
For a polynomial P of degree n ≥ 2 , define
D S ( P ) : = inf z ∈ C , P ′ ( z ) ≠ 0 1 | P ′ ( z ) | max w ∈ C , P ′ ( w ) = 0 P ( z ) − P ( w ) z − w .
Similar to Conjecture 4, we have the following normalized version of Conjecture 7.
Conjecture 8.
[28,29] (Normalized Smale Dubinin-Sugawa Dual Mean Value Conjecture) Let P be a degree n ≥ 2 polynomial over C which is normalized, i.e., P ( 0 ) = 0 and P ′ ( 0 ) = 1 . Then
D S 0 ( P ) : = max w ∈ C , P ′ ( w ) = 0 P ( w ) w = 1 n = 1 deg ( P ) .
In 2016, Ng and Zhang showed that if P is a normalized polynomial, then D S 0 ( P ) > 1 4 deg ( P ) [26]. In 2019 Dubinin showed that D S ( P ) ≥ 1 n tan π 4 deg ( P ) [30]. In 2019, Hinkkanen, Kayumov and Khammatova showed that Conjecture 7 holds for polynomials of degree six [31]. In 2025, Hinkkanen, Kayumov and Khammatova showed that Conjecture 7 holds for polynomials of degree six [32].
In this paper, we ask for non-Archimedean versions of Theorems 1 and 6. We show that if universal constants exist for the non-Archimedean Smale and the Dubinin–Sugawa dual mean value problems, the former is bounded below by unity, whereas the latter is bounded above by unity.

2. Non-Archimedean Smale Mean Value Problem

Let K be a field. Recall that a map | · | : K → [ 0 , ∞ ) is said to be a non-Archimedean valuation if the following conditions hold:
(i)
If λ ∈ K satisfies | λ | = 0 , then λ = 0 .
(ii)
| λ μ | = | λ | | μ | for all λ , μ ∈ K .
(iii)
(Ultratriangle inequality) | λ + μ | ≤ max { λ | , | μ | } for all λ , μ ∈ K .
We say K is non-Archimedean complete valued field if it is complete w.r.t. the ultrametric d ( λ , μ ) : = | λ − μ | for all λ , μ ∈ K [33]. Throughout the article we assume that K is algebraically closed.
We ask for non-Archimedean version of Theorem 2 as follows.
Problem 1.
(Non-Archimedean Smale Mean Value Problem) Let K be a non-Archimedean (complete) valued field. Whether there is a universal constant S K (which may depend upon K ) satisfying the following: Let P ( z ) : = a 0 + a 1 z + a 2 z 2 + ⋯ + a n z n be a polynomial of degree n ≥ 2 over K . If z ∈ K is not a critical point of P, then there exists a critical point w ∈ K of P such that
P ( z ) − P ( w ) z − w ≤ S K | P ′ ( z ) | .
In the following result we derive a constraint for non-Archimedean Smale mean value constant, if exists.
Theorem 9.
Let K be a non-Archimedean valued field. The constant S K in Problem 1, if exists, satisfies S K ≥ 1 .
Proof. 
Let P ( z ) : = ( z − a ) ( z − b ) ∈ K [ z ] . Then P ′ ( z ) = 2 z − ( a + b ) for all z ∈ K . Let z ∈ K be such that P ′ ( z ) ≠ 0 . Note that P ′ has only one zero, namely c : = a + b 2 . Define x : = z − a and y : = z − b . Then
z − c = z − a + b 2 = z − a + z − b 2 = x + y 2 , P ′ ( z ) = z − a + z − b = x + y , P ( c ) = a + b 2 − a a + b 2 − b = − ( b − a ) 2 4 = − ( x − y ) 2 4
and
P ( z ) − P ( c ) = x y + ( x − y ) 2 4 = ( x + y ) 2 4 .
Hence
P ( z ) − P ( c ) z − c = x + y 2 = 1 | 2 | | P ′ ( z ) | .
Therefore
S K ≥ 1 | 2 | ≥ 1 .
□
Theorem 10.
Let K be a non-Archimedean valued field. Assume that there is an n ∈ N ∖ { 1 , 2 } such that K has ( n − 1 ) -th roots of unity. The constant S K in Problem 1, if exists, satisfies S K ≥ | n − 1 | | n | = 1 − 1 n .
Proof. 
We define the polynomial P ( z ) : = z n − n z ∈ K [ z ] . The point z = 0 is not a critical point of P. Let w ∈ K be any critical point of P. Then w is a ( n − 1 ) -th root of unity. We now see that
| P ( 0 ) − P ( w ) | | 0 − w | = | P ( w ) | | w | = | w n − n w | = | w n − 1 − n | = | 1 − n | = | 1 − n | | n | | n | = | 1 − n | | n | | P ′ ( 0 ) | .
Hence S K ≥ | n − 1 | | n | = 1 − 1 n . □
Based on Theorem 5 we formulate the following higher order problem.
Problem 2.
(Higher Order Non-Archimedean Smale Mean Value Problem) Let K be a non-Archimedean (complete) valued field. Whether there is a universal constant R K (which may depend upon K ) satisfying the following: Let P ( z ) : = a 0 + a 1 z + a 2 z 2 + ⋯ + a n z n be a polynomial of degree n ≥ 2 over K . If z ∈ K is not a critical point of P, then there exists a critical point w ∈ K of P such that
| P ( k ) ( z ) | k ! | P ( z ) − P ( w ) | k − 1 | P ′ ( z ) | k ≤ R K k − 1 , ∀ 2 ≤ k ≤ n .
Theorem 11.
Let K be a non-Archimedean valued field. The constant R K in Problem 2, if exists, satisfies R K ≥ 1 / ( 2 | 2 | ) .
Proof. 
We continue from the proof of Theorem 9. Let z ∈ K be not a zero of P ′ . We have P ′ ′ ( z ) = 2 . Hence
| P ′ ′ ( z ) | = | 2 | , | P ′ ( z ) | = | x + y | , | P ( z ) − P ( c ) | = | x + y | 2 | 4 | .
We find
| P ( 2 ) ( z ) | 2 ! | P ( z ) − P ( c ) | 2 − 1 | P ′ ( z ) | 2 = | 2 | 2 | x + y | 2 | 4 | | x + y | 2 = 1 2 | 2 | .
Therefore
R K ≥ 1 2 | 2 | .
□

3. Non-Archimedean Dubinin-Sugawa Dual Mean Value Problem

We ask non-Archimedean version of Theorem 6 as follows.
Problem 3.
(Non-Archimedean Dubinin-Sugawa Dual Mean Value Problem) Let K be a non-Archimedean (complete) valued field. Whether there is a universal constant D K (which may depend upon K ) satisfying the following: Let P ( z ) : = a 0 + a 1 z + a 2 z 2 + ⋯ + a n z n be a polynomial of degree n ≥ 2 over K . If z ∈ K is not a critical point of P, then there exists a critical point w ∈ K of P such that
D K | P ′ ( z ) | ≤ | P ( z ) − P ( w ) | | z − w | .
Theorem 12.
Let K be a non-Archimedean valued field. The constant D K in Problem 3, if exists, satisfies D K ≤ 1 .
Proof. 
From the proof of Theorem 9, we get that D K ≤ | 2 | ≤ 1 . □
Theorem 13.
Let K be a non-Archimedean valued field. Assume that there is an n ∈ N ∖ { 1 , 2 } such that K has ( n − 1 ) -th roots of unity. The constant D K in Problem 3, if exists, satisfies D K ≤ | n | | n − 1 | .
Proof. 
By defining polynomial P ( z ) : = z n − n z ∈ K [ z ] we get that D K ≤ | n | | n − 1 | . □

4. Conclusion

For 45 years, the Smale mean value theorem has remained a cornerstone result in the theory of polynomials, while the Dubinin–Sugawa dual mean value theorem has served a similar vital role for 17 years. In this article, we asked for non-Archimedean versions of both theorems. We established explicit bounds for these constants, conditioning on their existence.

References

  1. Smale, S. The fundamental theorem of algebra and complexity theory. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 1981, 4, 1–36. [CrossRef]
  2. Rahman, Q.I.; Schmeisser, G. Analytic theory of polynomials; Vol. 26, London Mathematical Society Monographs. New Series, The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002; pp. xiv+742.
  3. Sheil-Small, T. Complex polynomials; Vol. 75, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002; pp. xx+428. [CrossRef]
  4. Smale, S. Mathematical problems for the next century. Math. Intelligencer 1998, 20, 7–15. [CrossRef]
  5. Smale, S. Mathematical problems for the next century; Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2000; pp. 271–294.
  6. Shub, M.; Smale, S. Computational complexity: on the geometry of polynomials and a theory of cost. II. SIAM J. Comput. 1986, 15, 145–161. [CrossRef]
  7. Smale, S. On the efficiency of algorithms of analysis. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 1985, 13, 87–121. [CrossRef]
  8. Shub, M.; Smale, S. Computational complexity. On the geometry of polynomials and a theory of cost. I. Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. (4) 1985, 18, 107–142.
  9. Tischler, D. Critical points and values of complex polynomials. J. Complexity 1989, 5, 438–456. [CrossRef]
  10. Sendov, B.; Marinov, P. Verification of Smale’s mean value conjecture for n≤10. C. R. Acad. Bulgare Sci. 2007, 60, 1151–1156.
  11. Andrievskii, V.V.; Ruscheweyh, S. Complex polynomials and maximal ranges: background and applications; Vol. 430, Math. Appl., Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht, 1998; pp. 31–54.
  12. Hinkkanen, A.; Kayumov, I. On critical values of polynomials with real critical points. Constr. Approx. 2010, 32, 385–392. [CrossRef]
  13. Hinkkanen, A.; Kayumov, I. Smale’s problem for critical points on certain two rays. J. Aust. Math. Soc. 2010, 88, 183–191. [CrossRef]
  14. Beardon, A.F.; Minda, D.; Ng, T.W. Smale’s mean value conjecture and the hyperbolic metric. Math. Ann. 2002, 322, 623–632. [CrossRef]
  15. Fujikawa, E.; Sugawa, T. Geometric function theory and Smale’s mean value conjecture. Proc. Japan Acad. Ser. A Math. Sci. 2006, 82, 97–100.
  16. Conte, A.; Fujikawa, E.; Lakic, N. Smale’s mean value conjecture and the coefficients of univalent functions. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 2007, 135, 3295–3300. [CrossRef]
  17. Crane, E. A bound for Smale’s mean value conjecture for complex polynomials. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 2007, 39, 781–791. [CrossRef]
  18. Crane, E. Extremal polynomials in Smale’s mean value conjecture. Comput. Methods Funct. Theory 2006, 6, 145–163. [CrossRef]
  19. Ng, T.W. Smale’s mean value conjecture for odd polynomials. J. Aust. Math. Soc. 2003, 75, 409–411. [CrossRef]
  20. Dubinin, V. Inequalities for critical values of polynomials. Sbornik: Mathematics 2006, 197, 1167–1176.
  21. Sendov, B. Generalization of the Smale’s mean value conjecture. C. R. Acad. Bulgare Sci. 2002, 55, 5–10.
  22. Sendov, B.; Nikolov, N. Variations of Smale’s mean value conjecture. C. R. Acad. Bulgare Sci. 2003, 56, 9–14.
  23. Tischler, D. Perturbations of critical fixed points of analytic maps. Astérisque 1994, pp. 8, 407–422.
  24. Tyson, J.T. Counterexamples to Tischler’s strong form of Smale’s mean value conjecture. Bull. London Math. Soc. 2005, 37, 95–106. [CrossRef]
  25. Ng, T.; Tsang, C. Polynomials Versus Finite Blaschke Products; Vol. 65, Fields Institute Communications, Springer, Boston, MA., 2013; pp. 249–274.
  26. Ng, T.W.; Zhang, Y. Smale’s mean value conjecture for finite Blaschke products. J. Anal. 2016, 24, 331–345. [CrossRef]
  27. Dimitrov, D.K. Smale’s conjecture on mean values of polynomials and electrostatics. Serdica Math. J. 2007, 33, 399–410.
  28. Dubinin, V.; Sugawa, T. Dual mean value problem for complex polynomials. Proc. Japan Acad. Ser. A Math. Sci. 2009, 85, 135–137.
  29. Dubinin, V.N. Methods of geometric function theory in classical and modern problems for polynomials. Uspekhi Mat. Nauk 2012, 67, 3–88. [CrossRef]
  30. Dubinin, V.N. On the dual mean-value conjecture for complex polynomials. Math. Notes 2019, 106, 133–135. [CrossRef]
  31. Hinkkanen, A.; Kayumov, I.R.; Khammatova, D.M. Dual Smale’s mean value conjecture. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 2019, 147, 5227–5237. [CrossRef]
  32. Hinkkanen, A.; Kayumov, I.R.; Khammatova, D.M. Dual Smale’s mean value conjecture for n=7. Constr. Approx. 2025, 61, 603–613. [CrossRef]
  33. Schikhof, W.H. Ultrametric calculus. An introduction to p-adic analysis; Vol. 4, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1984.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.