Submitted:
30 September 2026
Posted:
02 October 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
We examine how equity markets price firms’ exposure to maritime chokepoint disruptions when the bypass routes themselves become impaired. The paper develops a 2023–2026 event-study and panel framework centered on the Strait of Hormuz, the Red Sea/Bab el-Mandeb corridor, and Saudi Arabia’s East-West Pipeline. We distinguish primary-route exposure from detour vulnerability through a Dual Chokepoint Exposure Index (DCEI) and an Independent Deliverable Capacity (IDC) measure that discounts nominal bypass capacity for terminal, vessel, insurance, inventory, transfer, and onward-route constraints. The design tests abnormal returns and volatility around route-disruption events; identifies a detour-failure premium by comparing primary-closure events with the 20 July 2026 Saudi port-navigation ban and the 10–11 September 2026 East-West Pipeline disruption; traces subsequent changes in cash holdings, inventories, trade credit, leverage, and capital expenditure; and models customer–supplier contagion through network-adjusted exposure. Documented evidence from 2023–2026 shows that maritime stress shifted rather than disappeared as trade was rerouted and that restoration of bypass capacity carried market-relevant information. The framework connects supply-chain resilience to asset pricing and corporate finance by treating independent deliverability—not nominal redundancy—as the financially relevant hedge against chokepoint risk.
Keywords:
geopolitical risk
; supply chain disruption
; maritime chokepoints
; Strait of Hormuz
; Red Sea
; event study
; firm valuation
; financial contagion
; war-risk insurance
; energy security
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.