Submitted:
01 October 2026
Posted:
02 October 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
The first paper of the negentropic value currency program established the value ontology and the microeconomic incentives (Cheng and Cheng, 2026d); the second proved that macrostability is equivalent to the maintenance of four integrity conditions — the measurement layer unfalsified, the calibration layer uncaptured, the issuance layer uncorrupted, and the extinction layer unfailing (Cheng and Cheng, 2026b). Both papers, however, left the guardian of integrity offstage: they assumed the existence of legitimate accounting, consensus, and supervision procedures without specifying the procedures themselves. The present paper takes up this suspended constitutional question: who guards the four integrity conditions, and by whom, through what procedures, and under what constraints is α set, so that the system escapes majoritarian tyranny, technocratic rule, and the alienation of algorithmic black boxes alike? We formalize the problem as the delegation of value judgments and propose a three-tier governance architecture. The first tier is the bicameral algorithmic democracy of the Global Value Parliament (GVP): a House of Citizens generated by three-dimensional stratified sortition (500 seats, three-year terms, no reappointment) and a House of Experts nominated by authoritative learned bodies and confirmed through peer review (300 seats, six-year terms), with revisions of core parameters requiring a double majority in both houses. The second tier is three constitutional firewalls — the Minority Protection and Exploration Fund (value-inclusion axis), the independent Audit and Emergency Adjustment Committee (process-oversight axis, with quarterly disparate-impact audits and emergency braking powers, extended here to the audit of the extinction layer), and a blockchain-notarized platform of popular oversight (popular-oversight axis, with million-signature initiatives and a 70% opposition re-review rule). The third tier is an economic constitution of metabolic governance, now with four clauses: the intrinsic metabolism rate δ, the Civilization Time Bank, financial minimalism, and knowledge-genealogy attribution with intergenerational decay of inheritance. A guardianship matrix assigns every institution to the integrity condition it defends, and the capture-cost proposition states that global capture is conjunctively superadditive. The teleological loop then anchors the architecture to the survival and elevation of civilization: knowing, utilizing, and mastering cosmic truth, until the withdrawal of money itself. Every mechanism is accompanied by its failure-mode analysis, and all claims of validity are marked as designed but unexecuted; the verification designs are ordered by execution priority, with the audit-detection design first and the sortition design re-scoped to laboratory evidence.
Keywords:
algorithmic democracy
; deliberative democracy
; sortition
; algorithmic accountability
; monetary constitution
; mechanism design
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.