Preprints.org logo
Preprint
Review

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Prevalence of Anxiety, Depression, and Stress Among University Students: An Analysis of Management and Self-Care Programs

Submitted:

24 September 2026

Posted:

28 September 2026

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Background: The post-pandemic academic landscape has witnessed a significant rise in mental health challenges among higher education students. While general psychological distress is widely acknowledged, a comprehensive synthesis evaluating the specific prevalence of anxiety, depression, and stress alongside contemporary pro-active self-care and institutional stress-management interventions remains critical. This paper analyzes the global burden of student psychopathology and evaluates the clinical utility of modern preventive frameworks. Methods: A critical synthesis was conducted utilizing recent large-scale meta-analytic data, randomized controlled trials, and observational studies (2024–2026) focusing on university cohorts, specifically healthcare and medical tracks. The analysis examined overall prevalence rates, situation-specific constructs (e.g., test anxiety), and the efficacy of modern stress-management modalities (Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction [MBSR], resilience training, and the Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills [IMB] model) across traditional and digital formats. Results: Global meta-analytic data establishes a severe post-pandemic mental health burden, with a pooled prevalence of 45.1% for depression, 43.6% for anxiety, and 45.6% for general stress among university students. Within highly specialized medical cohorts, situation-specific test anxiety isolates a critical sub-threshold affecting 49.8% of students globally. While digital self-help technologies offer scalability, attitudinal evaluations show that students heavily favor face-to-face or blended care models over solo digital interventions due to the perceived credibility of interpersonal support. Theory-driven, multi-construct programs like the IMB model and structured resilience training show the highest clinical efficacy in mitigating academic burnout. Conclusions: Student psychological distress is a systemic institutional issue rather than a localized individual failure. Higher education institutions must transition from reactive counseling to proactive, preventative mental health architectures by integrating structured self-care education and blended counseling models directly into the core academic curricula.
Keywords: 
anxiety
;  
depression
;  
stress management
;  
self-care programs
;  
university students
;  
test anxiety
;  
blended care
;  
IMB model
Subject: 
Public Health and Healthcare  -   Nursing
What this study adds
  • Comprehensive Post-Pandemic Baseline: Synthesizes the most recent global epidemiological data (up to late 2026), establishing that university student depression (45.1%) and anxiety (43.6%) have formed a high, persistent baseline that has failed to return to pre-pandemic levels.
  • Granular Focus on Evaluative Threat: Isolates and clarifies the specific global burden of situation-specific test anxiety (49.8%) among medical cohorts, shifting the focus from general trait anxiety to context-bound psychological triggers in professional education.
  • Theory-Driven Intervention Mapping: Identifies the unique scalability and clinical efficacy of multi-construct frameworks—specifically the Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills (IMB) model—proving that structured, integrated stress education outperforms fragmented, lecture-based counseling.
  • Evidence-Based Modality Evaluation: Evaluates contemporary student expectations regarding digital mental health technology, establishing that pure digital self-help is insufficient and identifying blended care counseling as the most accepted and optimal institutional pathway moving forward.

I. Introduction

Maintaining optimal mental health encompasses an individual’s emotional, psychological, and social well-being, serving as a fundamental component of cognitive efficacy, academic achievement, and overall life satisfaction (Bin Abdulrahman et al., 2026; Kim & Chang, 2026). However, the transition into higher education represents a distinct developmental milestone marked by unique academic, social, and economic challenges that significantly increase student susceptibility to psychological distress (Antón-Ruiz et al., 2026). Emerging epidemiological evidence from the post-COVID-19 period indicates that the global mental health burden among university students remains a critical public health concern (Antón-Ruiz et al., 2026; Magorokosho et al., 2025; Ozamiz-Etxebarria et al., 2025). Recent meta-analytic data reveals a staggering pooled prevalence of 45.1% for overall depression and 43.6% for overall anxiety within this population, highlighting a sustained psychological burden that has persisted long after the acute phase of the pandemic (Antón-Ruiz et al., 2026). Consequently, higher education institutions face an urgent requirement to move beyond reactive frameworks and implement systematic, evidence-based preventive support services (Cogan et al., 2025; García-Pérez et al., 2025).
Within the broader university cohort, individuals enrolled in highly demanding healthcare disciplines—such as medicine and nursing—experience a disproportionate volume of academic and clinical stressors (Dong et al., 2026; Mohamed et al., 2024; Ullah et al., 2025). The clinical training environment requires undergraduate students to navigate heavy cognitive workloads, frequent examinations, and the emotional toll of direct patient care, which collectively accelerate rates of burnout and self-regulatory fatigue (Dong et al., 2026; Karim et al., 2026). This chronic evaluative pressure frequently manifests as high-stakes state anxiety, with global estimates showing that situation-specific test anxiety affects nearly half (49.8%) of all medical students worldwide (Omar et al., 2026). This excessive evaluative threat markedly impairs working memory resources, slowing down information processing and trapping students in a cyclical pattern where academic underperformance reinforces feelings of personal inadequacy, test anxiety, and self-doubt (Omar et al., 2026).
To mitigate these adverse outcomes and protect the well-being of future healthcare professionals, contemporary psychiatric and educational research has shifted toward examining proactive, theory-driven stress self-management interventions (Aparicio, 2026; Bin Abdulrahman et al., 2026; Lea et al., 2026). Traditional lecture-based mental health education often proves formalistic and detached from students’ real-time psychological needs, emphasizing the need for structured workshops that cultivate practical coping mechanisms, such as mindfulness-based stress reduction, distress regulation, and cognitive resilience training (Bin Abdulrahman et al., 2026; Christina J. Ezemenaka et al., 2025; Vourda et al., 2025). Furthermore, implementing multi-construct health frameworks—such as the Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills (IMB) model—allows institutions to systematically enhance stress knowledge, mindset, and behavioral self-compassion while leveraging perceived social support as a critical psychological buffer (Alharbi et al., 2026; Dong et al., 2026). Concurrently, while digital healthcare technologies and self-help materials offer practical advantages regarding waiting times and accessibility, attitudinal evaluations suggest that students still heavily favor face-to-face counseling or blended care models due to the perceived credibility, motivation, and effectiveness of direct interpersonal support (De Witte et al., 2025; Edwin et al., 2024). This paper aims to synthesize current epidemiological data regarding the global prevalence of anxiety, depression, and stress among university students, while critically analyzing the mechanisms, implementation barriers, and clinical efficacy of modern self-care and institutional stress-management initiatives (Abulfaraj et al., 2024; Mariscal-Garcia et al., 2026).

II. Methods

This study stands as a critical literature synthesis evaluating the global burden of student mental health. A systematic framework was applied to evaluate peer-reviewed articles published between 2024 and 2026 across major electronic databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The inclusion criteria prioritized large-scale meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and observational cross-sectional tracks examining anxiety, depression, and stress specifically within undergraduate university student cohorts, with a categorical emphasis on high-strain medical and nursing tracks.

III. Results

A. Global Prevalence of Mental Health Disorders Among Students
The post-pandemic academic landscape is characterized by a persistently high baseline of psychological morbidity among undergraduate populations, challenging prior assumptions of a rapid return to pre-pandemic wellness baselines (Antón-Ruiz et al., 2026; Magorokosho et al., 2025). Large-scale meta-analytic data involving over 255,000 university students establishes that overall depression affects 45.1% of the student population, while overall anxiety disorders impact 43.6% (Antón-Ruiz et al., 2026). When stratified by severity, the distribution of these conditions reveals that while mild symptoms are most frequent (21.9% for depression; 23.1% for anxiety), a clinically significant proportion of students experience moderate to severe forms of psychological distress that directly undermine cognitive and social functioning (Antón-Ruiz et al., 2026). General psychological stress is similarly pervasive, with an overall prevalence of 45.6%, and severe, high perceived stress specifically incapacitating 14.5% of the general student body (Antón-Ruiz et al., 2026).
When isolating the specific burden within professional medical tracks, the prevalence of situation-specific constructs displays an even sharper upward trajectory (Karim et al., 2026; Omar et al., 2026). High-stakes evaluative environments present a profound psychological challenge, with global pooled data indicating that test anxiety affects approximately half (49.8%) of all medical students globally (Omar et al., 2026). This localized state anxiety operates at a significantly higher threshold than baseline trait anxiety, driven by the hyper-competitive and dense structural layout of medical curricula (Bin Abdulrahman et al., 2026; Omar et al., 2026). The epidemiological distribution of these disorders also highlights notable sociodemographic and temporal variations; for instance, evaluative distress peaks acutely during active examination cycles (55.4%) and is significantly more pronounced among first-year undergraduate tracks (58.6%) as students struggle to adapt to the advanced cognitive workload (Omar et al., 2026).
Furthermore, rigorous comparative analyses between academic disciplines confirm that nursing and medical students shoulder a distinctly elevated burden of psychological distress relative to non-healthcare peers (Dong et al., 2026; Mohamed et al., 2024; Ullah et al., 2025). Systematic reviews of undergraduate nursing student tracks document an overall stress prevalence of 27%, with moderate-to-severe stress tiers dominating late-stage clinical practicums (Dong et al., 2026). This unique elevation in morbidity among healthcare cohorts is strongly bound to context-bound stressors, such as initial clinical rotations, where undergraduate students experience intense pressure to execute flawless technical skills alongside the severe emotional weight of witnessing patient suffering and critical illness (Mohamed et al., 2024; Ullah et al., 2025).
B. Determinants and Risk Factors of Student Stress
The etiology of psychological distress among university students is multifaceted, driven by a complex interplay of academic, environmental, and individual covariates (Mariscal-Garcia et al., 2026). Chief among the academic determinants is the unrelenting pressure of continuous, high-stakes performance evaluation, which systematically accelerates rates of academic burnout, chronic fatigue, and pervasive self-doubt (Dong et al., 2026; Karim et al., 2026). In medical and nursing programs, this pressure is frequently exacerbated by the internal manifestation of the “impostor phenomenon” and perfectionistic behavioral traits, where high-achieving students internalize an intense fear of clinical failure, interpreting normal learning curves as evidence of personal inadequacy (Bin Abdulrahman et al., 2026). Additionally, the rigorous schedules dictated by concurrent lecture demands and demanding clinical rotations disrupt standard circadian rhythms, causing severe sleep disturbances and daytime sleepiness that further deplete students’ neurocognitive coping capacities (Bin Abdulrahman et al., 2026; Dong et al., 2026).
Beyond structural academic pressures, environmental and socioeconomic factors heavily dictate an individual student’s vulnerability to mental health decline (Antón-Ruiz et al., 2026; Mariscal-Garcia et al., 2026). Financial strain, subjective economic insecurity, and regional socio-political instabilities contribute significantly to the baseline risk, with students from lower socioeconomic backgrounds displaying marked elevations in depression and anxiety severity (Antón-Ruiz et al., 2026; Dong et al., 2026). Conversely, parental education levels do not consistently demonstrate a protective or buffering effect against psychological distress, suggesting that direct material stability and immediate emotional support exert a far greater influence on a student’s mental well-being than parental academic achievements alone (Antón-Ruiz et al., 2026; Dong et al., 2026).
At the individual and interpersonal level, gender and social configurations serve as crucial modulators of stress contingencies (Mariscal-Garcia et al., 2026; Omar et al., 2026). Female undergraduate students consistently report higher numerical and statistically significant prevalence rates of general anxiety, depression, and severe test anxiety compared to their male peers (Antón-Ruiz et al., 2026; Mohamed et al., 2024; Omar et al., 2026). This gendered vulnerability is frequently linked to differences in coping styles and heightened stress autonomic reactivity under chronic strain (Bin Abdulrahman et al., 2026). Crucially, the presence or absence of a robust interpersonal support structure represents one of the most definitive defensive factors in student psychopathology (Alharbi et al., 2026; Kim & Chang, 2026). Perceived social support from family networks, peer groups, and institutional mentors acts as a primary psychological buffer; students who report strong, accessible social support display significantly higher clinical resilience and lower levels of general distress, whereas isolation or low social support correlates directly with academic procrastination, substance use, and severe psychological deterioration (Alharbi et al., 2026; Dong et al., 2026; Kim & Chang, 2026).

IV. Discutions

A. Intervention Programs and Self-Care Strategies
To combat the high prevalence of psychological distress among university students, higher education institutions have increasingly focused on implementing proactive, evidence-based stress-management initiatives (Bin Abdulrahman et al., 2026; García-Pérez et al., 2025). Rather than relying on traditional, lecture-based reactive counseling, modern approaches emphasize structured skills training designed to foster adaptive self-care behaviors and internal resilience (Aparicio, 2026; Bin Abdulrahman et al., 2026). Resilience training programs, which are heavily grounded in cognitive-behavioral and positive psychology frameworks, have been shown to significantly reduce depressive symptoms and improve emotional functioning (Abulfaraj et al., 2024; Bin Abdulrahman et al., 2026). By teaching students active behavioral adaptation, cognitive reframing, and structured problem-solving, these interventions help undergraduate students reframe academic stressors as opportunities for competence enhancement rather than existential threats (Abulfaraj et al., 2024; Bin Abdulrahman et al., 2026).
Concurrently, Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) programs have emerged as a primary clinical modality for emotional regulation in high-strain environments (Aparicio, 2026; Bin Abdulrahman et al., 2026). Standardized MBSR interventions introduce students to secular present-moment awareness, non-judgmental thought observation, and physiological relaxation practices (Bin Abdulrahman et al., 2026). When integrated into wellness or self-care workshops, these mindfulness practices yield sustained reductions in perceived stress and substantial enhancements in self-compassion, altruism, and sleep quality (Aparicio, 2026; Bin Abdulrahman et al., 2026). Evidence indicates that multi-component wellness initiatives—which combine experiential mindfulness training with social support networks and peer-led mentoring—provide the most robust defense against the onset of severe burnout and test anxiety (Bin Abdulrahman et al., 2026; Christina J. Ezemenaka et al., 2025; Vourda et al., 2025).
A significant evolution in theory-driven interventions is the application of the Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills (IMB) model to student mental health education (Dong et al., 2026). The IMB framework operates on the premise that sustained health behavior change requires a comprehensive alignment of structured knowledge (information), positive mindsets and social incentives (motivation), and operational self-regulatory capacities (behavioral skills) (Dong et al., 2026). In practice, an IMB-grounded stress self-management program systematically improves students’ cognitive appraisal of stress mechanisms, fosters a “stress-is-enhancing” mindset, leverages perceived social support networks, and develops behavioral skills like mindfulness and self-compassion (Dong et al., 2026). By addressing these multi-dimensional cognitive and behavioral components simultaneously, theory-driven, construct-integrated health education yields significantly larger psychological buffer effects than fragmented, isolated coping workshops (Dong et al., 2026).
B. Student Perceptions of Interventions: Digital vs. Traditional Modalities
The rapid expansion of digital health technology has introduced a wide array of online platforms, mobile applications, and on-paper self-help materials aimed at increasing the accessibility of mental health resources (De Witte et al., 2025; Edwin et al., 2024). When evaluated on practical dimensions, students and the general population view digital and paper-based self-help tools highly favorably regarding reduced waiting times, financial cost, and general convenience (De Witte et al., 2025). However, when evaluating core intervention components—such as perceived helpfulness, credibility, and the ability to motivate long-term adherence—traditional face-to-face counseling remains overwhelmingly preferred (De Witte et al., 2025). Focus group evaluations indicate that medical and healthcare students exhibit specific expectations toward self-help tools, often demanding high clinical evidence and clear confidentiality guarantees before integrating digital modalities into their personal routines (Edwin et al., 2024).
This clear preference gap indicates that pure digital self-help (without human oversight) frequently fails to meet the complex emotional and interpersonal needs of highly stressed student populations (De Witte et al., 2025). Consequently, the implementation of blended care counseling models—which combine structured digital or online self-management tasks with periodic, synchronized face-to-face therapeutic sessions—represents a promising intermediate pathway for institutional mental health services (De Witte et al., 2025). Blended intervention frameworks receive attitudinal and likelihood-of-use ratings from students that are highly comparable to traditional face-to-face counseling (De Witte et al., 2025). By providing the flexibility and immediate access of digital platforms alongside the clinical credibility and motivating impact of direct personal support, blended counseling offers a scalable and accepted approach to managing student distress (De Witte et al., 2025).

V. Future Perspectives and Conclusions

Future Perspectives
Looking forward, addressing the student mental health crisis requires a fundamental shift from individual-focused interventions to a broader socio-ecological and structural perspective. Future initiatives must explore how institutional environments, systemic grading structures, and toxic competitive cultures actively drive psychological distress, rather than placing the entire burden of resilience solely on the student. Additionally, as artificial intelligence and advanced digital platforms continue to reshape higher education, longitudinal research is urgently required to evaluate the long-term clinical efficacy and user retention of automated, anonymous digital self-help tools. There is also a critical need to design culturally tailored stress-management programs that address the unique challenges of underrepresented student demographics and intersectional groups. Ultimately, the future of student wellness lies in creating a unified ecosystem where academic policy, peer-led support structures, and validated clinical counseling models seamlessly intersect to foster true psychological safety.
Conclusions
In conclusion, the post-pandemic academic landscape presents a clear and pervasive mental health burden, with depression, anxiety, and high perceived stress remaining critically high across global student populations. This crisis is uniquely intensified within healthcare education tracks, where the unrelenting demands of dense medical and nursing curricula, combined with high-stakes evaluations, trigger severe instances of chronic academic strain and state-bound test anxiety. Because these psychological morbidities directly impair cognitive functioning, academic performance, and long-term professional progression, higher education institutions can no longer treat student distress through purely reactive, ad-hoc counseling models.
To safeguard the next generation of professionals, university administrators and educational policymakers must transition toward proactive, preventative mental health architectures. True progress requires integrating evidence-based stress self-management education, structured resilience training, and mindfulness directly into core academic curricula as mandatory components of professional development. Furthermore, institutions should optimize student engagement by adopting blended care support models that combine digital flexibility with the invaluable motivating impact of face-to-face peer and professional counseling. Finally, implementing regular, institutionalized psychological screening during high-risk academic cycles is vital to ensure early identification, dismantle institutional stigma, and establish an academic culture where help-seeking behavior is systematically supported and normalized.

Author Contributions

Mirela Tushe (M.T.): Conceptualization; Study design; Data analysis; Writing – original draft; Supervision. Enkelejda Shkurti (E.Sh.): Literature search; Writing – manuscript preparation; Critical review. Gerta Kupi (G.K.): Funding acquisition; Materials; Data collection DoRA Karagjozi (D.K.): Literature search, Writing – manuscript preparation Rezarta Tota (R.T.): Data collection; Methodology; Writing – review and editing; Project administration.

References

  1. Abulfaraj, G. G.; Upsher, R.; Zavos, H. M. S.; Dommett, E. J. The Impact of Resilience Interventions on University Students’ Mental Health and Well-Being: A Systematic Review. Educ. Sci. 2024, 14(5), 510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Alharbi, B. S.; Aljabri, M. M.; Ali, E. A. Perceived Social Support and Psychological Stress Among Nursing Students: Evidence from a Cross-Sectional Study. Healthcare 2026, 14(8), 1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Antón-Ruiz, J. A.; Bernabé, M.; Heredia-Oliva, E. Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and stress among university students in the post-COVID-19 period: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychol. 2026, 14(1), 1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Aparicio, Álvaro. La salud mental y estrategias de autocuidado en estudiantes de medicina. Alerta Rev. Científica Del. Inst. Nac. De Salud 2026, 9(1), 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bin Abdulrahman, K. A.; Hefny, M.; Alghamdi, S. A. The value of stress management programs for medical students: a systematic review. Front. Public Health 2026, 13, 1737330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ezemenaka, Christina J.; Horton, Abby G.; Duncan, Kacie W. Evaluating a stress management workshop on nursing student mental health and well-being. Teach. Learn. Nurs. 2025, 20, 4–e1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cogan, N.; Murray, A.; Long, E.; Gardani, M.; O’Toole, M.; Leung, M.; Kyratzi, S.; Milicev, J.; Dryburgh, K.; Bolota, C.; Ho, L. Student Mental Health in UK Higher Education Institutions: Protocol for a Scoping Review of Trends, Gaps, and Research Directions. JMIR Res. Protoc. 2025, 14, e65594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. De Witte, N. A. J.; Buelens, F.; Apolinário-Hagen, J.; Van Daele, T. Attitudes and Expectations Towards Mental Health Interventions in the General Population: Comparing Face-to-Face Counseling, Blended Counseling, and Digital or On-Paper Self-Help. Clin. Psychol. Eur. 2025, 7(4), e16235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dong, X. J.; Ahmad, N.; Tan, K. A.; Lee, K.; Mohd-Zulkefli, N. A.; Guo, K.; He, L. P. The effectiveness of information-motivation-behavioral skills (IMB)-based stress self-management health education on reducing stress among nursing students: a study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Trials 2026, 27(1), 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Edwin, J.; Cornwall, J.; Du Plooy, K. What medical students want from mental health self-help resources: A focus group study. Ment. Health Prev. 2024, 35, 200353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Laura, García-Pérez; Ubago-Jiménez José Luis; Mar, Cepero-González; Padial-Ruz Rosario. Integrating mental health interventions in higher education: An evidence-based umbrella review. Ment. Health Phys. Act. 2025, 29, 100708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Karim, M. R.; Haque, S. A. S.; Rumeen, F.; Aruneema, P. Academic stress and its psychosocial and behavioral determinants in medical students: Findings from a cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE 2026, 21(4), e0347306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kim, S. Y.; Chang, W. L. Health practices, resilience, perceived social support, and mental health well-being among college students. J. Am. Coll. Health J. ACH Advance online publication. 2026, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lea, W.; Jayagopal, V.; Pointon, L.; Ovalekar, R.; Singh, R.; Johnson, J. Are we preparing our medical students to fail with a reactive not proactive approach to managing workplace stress, reducing burnout and addressing mental health problems? Future Healthc. J. 2026, 13(1), 100506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Magorokosho, N.K.; Heraclides, A.; Papaleontiou-Louca, E.; Prodromou, M. Resilience and mental health in university students post-COVID-19 pandemic: insights from the Republic of Cyprus. Front. Public Health 2025, 13, 1638427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mariscal-Garcia, F. J.; García-Arellano, S.; Román-Fernández, I. V.; Pineda-Sánchez, J. E.; Juárez-Rodríguez, P. Mechanisms and Contingencies of Stress in University Students: A Systematic Scoping Review of Stress Mediators and Moderators. Behav. Sci. 2026, 16(2), 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mohamed, N. A.; Ali, S. O.; Ehrahim, E. E. E.; Ahmed, A. L.; Wahba, A. M. Predictors of Academic and Clinical Stress Among Nursing Students. SAGE Open Nurs. 2024, 10, 23779608241290392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Omar, Y.M.; Darwish, N.E.; Elsaadany, M.A.; et al. Prevalence of test anxiety among medical students: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med. Educ. 2026, 26, 1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ozamiz-Etxebarria, N.; Idoiaga Mondragon, N.; Tsybuliak, N. Strengthening mental health among university students. Front. Psychol. 2025, 16, 1689173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ullah, H.; Arbab, S.; Liu, C. Q.; Du, Q.; Khan, S. A.; Khan, S.; Dad, O.; Tian, Y.; Li, K. Source of Stress-Associated Factors Among Medical and Nursing Students: A Cross-Sectional Study. J. Nurs. Manag. 2025, 2025, 9928649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Vourda, M.-C.; Collins, J.; Kandaswamy, R.; Bevilaqua, M. C. d. N.; Kralj, C.; Percy, Z.; Strauss, N.; Zunszain, P. A.; Dias, G. P. A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of a Wellbeing Programme Designed for Undergraduate Students: Exploring Participants’ Experiences Using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Educ. Sci. 2025, 15(5), 604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.