Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Sharp Onset and Exact First-Mode Classification for the Planar Lane–Emden Robin Problem

Submitted:

23 September 2026

Posted:

24 September 2026

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
For the planar Lane--Emden equation with a positive Robin parameter, an earlier result gives two local symmetry-breaking points for \( p\ge8 \). We establish a global classification of all first-angular degeneracies along the positive radial branch. A unique exponent \( p_*\in(6.39,6.40) \) separates full linearized nondegeneracy from exactly two simple first-mode degeneracies. At \( p_* \) the first angular eigenvalue has a quadratic contact with zero; above it the two Robin parameters split at square-root rate and each gives a local branch of positive nonradial solutions. A rational interval certificate proves the numerical bracket.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction and Result

On the unit disk B ⊂ R 2 consider
− Δ u = u p in B , u > 0 , ∂ ν u + β u = 0 on ∂ B , p > 1 , β > 0 .
Zeraoulia [3] established two simple first-angular bifurcation points for p ≥ 8 . That is an existence result for two points. Our contribution identifies the unique sharp onset, proves that there are exactly two simple first-mode zeros for every exponent above it, and describes the single quadratic contact at onset and the square-root separation of the two points. Thus the work is a structural classification of the radial branch, beyond a numerical improvement of the sufficient bound 8. It does not claim uniqueness among all positive solutions below the onset. Related uniqueness results near exponent one are discussed in [1].

2. Radial Parametrization and the Phase Equation

Write P = p − 1 . Let w = w p be the positive solution, up to its first zero S p , of
w ′ ′ + s − 1 w ′ + w p = 0 , w ( 0 ) = 1 , w ′ ( 0 ) = 0 .
Set q = − s w ′ / w , z = s 2 w P . We first justify the parametrization used throughout.
Lemma 1. 
The first zero S p is finite, w ′ < 0 on ( 0 , S p ] , and q : ( 0 , S p ) → ( 0 , ∞ ) is a strictly increasing bijection. For every β > 0 there is exactly one positive radial solution, namely
U β ( r ) = ρ 2 / P w ( ρ r ) , ρ = q − 1 ( β ) .
Proof. 
Integration of ( s w ′ ) ′ = − s w p gives
− s w ′ ( s ) = ∫ 0 s t w ( t ) p d t > 0 .
Direct differentiation gives s q ′ = q 2 + z > 0 . If w remained positive for all s, then q ′ > q 2 / s would yield 1 / q ( s ) ≤ 1 / q ( s 0 ) − log ( s / s 0 ) , impossible for large s. Thus S p < ∞ , and the integral formula gives w ′ ( S p ) < 0 . Near zero w ( s ) = 1 − s 2 / 4 + O ( s 4 ) , whence q ( s ) → 0 ; as s ↑ S p , we have w ( s ) → 0 and w ′ ( S p ) < 0 , whence q ( s ) → ∞ .
Every positive radial solution with central value A > 0 equals A w ( A P / 2 r ) by scaling and uniqueness of the radial initial-value problem. Writing ρ = A P / 2 , positivity up to the boundary requires ρ < S p , and the Robin condition becomes q ( ρ ) = β . Strict monotonicity proves existence and uniqueness. □
With a dot denoting differentiation with respect to τ = log s , we have
q ˙ = q 2 + z , z ˙ = z ( 2 − P q ) .
Regarding z = Z P ( q ) as a function of q gives
Z P ′ ( q ) = f P ( q , Z P ( q ) ) , f P ( q , z ) = z ( 2 − P q ) q 2 + z , Z P ( q ) = 2 q − P + 1 2 q 2 + O ( q 3 ) .
The expansion follows by substituting w ( s ) = 1 − s 2 / 4 + p s 4 / 64 + O ( s 6 ) and inverting q ( s ) near zero. It is uniform when P ranges over a compact interval. The integral form of the radial initial-value problem, followed by standard ODE dependence away from zero, shows that Z P ( q ) depends smoothly on ( P , q ) for q > 0 .
Lemma 2. 
For q > 0 , 0 < Z P ( q ) < 2 q . If 2 − ( P + 1 ) q > 0 , then
q { 2 − ( P + 1 ) q } < Z P ( q ) < 2 q .
Proof. 
Put H = Z P / q . The phase system gives H ˙ = H { 2 − ( P + 1 ) q − H } . Initially H = 2 − ( P + 1 ) q / 2 + O ( q 2 ) < 2 ; a first contact at H = 2 would have H ˙ = − 2 ( P + 1 ) q < 0 , which is impossible. Also,
q H ′ = H { 2 − ( P + 1 ) q − H } q + H .
Initially H > 2 − ( P + 1 ) q . At a first contact with this lower comparison curve, H ′ = 0 while the curve’s derivative equals − ( P + 1 ) < 0 ; again crossing from above is impossible. □
The first-angular translation Jacobi field has boundary residual of the same sign as
F P ( q ) = Z P ( q ) − q ( 1 − q ) .
We derive the equivalence between F P ( q ) = 0 and a first-angular zero mode in Section 4.
Theorem 1. 
There is a unique p * ∈ ( 6.39 , 6.40 ) with the following properties.
1. 
If 1 < p < p * , the linearization at U β has trivial kernel for every β > 0 .
2. 
If p = p * , the first angular eigenvalue vanishes only at
β * = 1 + 1 − 4 / ( p * − 1 ) 2 .
It touches zero quadratically there. The higher angular and radial sectors have no zero mode at this point.
3. 
If p > p * , the first angular eigenvalue has exactly two simple zeros β p , − < β p , + . With P = p − 1 and
a P = 1 − 1 − 4 / P 2 , b P = 1 + 1 − 4 / P 2 ,
they satisfy a P < β p , − < b P < β p , + < 1 . Each is a transverse local bifurcation point of positive nonradial solutions of (1).
4. 
As p ↓ p * , with P * = p * − 1 ,
β p , ± = β * ± C * p − p * + O ( p − p * ) , C * 2 = − 2 ∂ P F P * ( β * ) P * ( 2 β * − 1 ) > 0 .

3. Zero Geometry and Parameter Ordering

The following proof uses only the scalar equation (3) and positivity of Z P .
Lemma 3. 
For every fixed q > 0 , P ↦ Z P ( q ) is strictly decreasing. For P > 4 , put G ( P ) = F P ( b P ) = Z P ( b P ) − 1 / P . Then
G ( P ) > 0 ⟺ F P ( q ) > 0 ( 0 < q < 1 ) , G ( P ) = 0 ⟺ F P has exactly one zero , at b P , G ( P ) < 0 ⟺ F P has exactly two simple zeros in ( 0 , 1 ) .
When G ( P ) < 0 , the zeros lie in ( a P , b P ) and ( b P , 1 ) , respectively.
Proof. 
If P 2 > P 1 , the expansion (3) makes Z P 2 < Z P 1 near zero. At a hypothetical first contact q 0 > 0 , their derivative difference equals
− ( P 2 − P 1 ) q 0 Z ( q 0 ) q 0 2 + Z ( q 0 ) < 0 ,
which precludes contact from below. Differentiation of (3) also makes strictness explicit. The sensitivity V = ∂ P Z P satisfies
V ′ = ( 2 − P q ) q 2 ( q 2 + Z P ) 2 V − q Z P q 2 + Z P , V ( q ) = − 1 2 q 2 + O ( q 3 ) .
Variation of constants from a sufficiently small positive starting point, followed by a limit to zero, shows V ( q ) < 0 for every q > 0 .
At any zero of F P , one has 0 < q < 1 and q 2 + Z P ( q ) = q . Therefore
F P ′ ( q ) = 1 − P q ( 1 − q ) whenever F P ( q ) = 0 .
At a tangential zero, differentiation of (3) yields
F P ′ ′ ( q ) = P ( 2 q − 1 ) .
Near zero F P ( q ) = q + O ( q 2 ) > 0 , and F P ( 1 ) = Z P ( 1 ) > 0 . By (6), zeros in ( 0 , a P ) can only cross upwards, zeros in ( a P , b P ) only downwards, and zeros in ( b P , 1 ) only upwards. There is no zero up to and including a P : a first zero there could not be reached from positive values; equality at a P is also impossible because (7) would give a strict local maximum at level zero. There is at most one downward crossing before b P and one upward crossing after it. At b P , a zero is a strict local minimum by (7). The three alternatives now follow by continuity and the endpoint signs. □
Proposition 1. 
There is a unique P * ∈ ( 5.39 , 5.40 ) such that F P is strictly positive on ( 0 , 1 ) for P < P * , has a single quadratic zero at b P * for P = P * , and has exactly two simple zeros for P > P * . These two zeros obey (5).
Proof. 
Section 6 verifies G ( 5.39 ) > 0 > G ( 5.40 ) . Lemma 3 and strict monotonicity in P imply that the set of parameters for which F P takes a negative value is a nonempty upper interval. Its left endpoint P * belongs to ( 5.39 , 5.40 ) .
At P * the function is nonnegative on ( 0 , 1 ) and must attain zero in the interior. Indeed, take negative points for P ↓ P * : the uniform expansion at q = 0 excludes convergence to zero, and Z P ( 1 ) > 0 excludes convergence to one. An interior zero is a minimum, so (6) and (7) force it to be b P * . It is the unique zero and is a nondegenerate quadratic minimum. For P < P * , F P > 0 everywhere by strict parameter ordering; for P > P * it is negative at the fixed point q = b P * , so Lemma 3 gives exactly two simple zeros.
At ( P * , β * ) = ( P * , b P * ) we have F = F q = 0 , F q q = P * ( 2 β * − 1 ) > 0 and F P = ∂ P Z P * ( β * ) < 0 . Taylor’s formula gives F ( P , q ) = F P ( P − P * ) + 1 2 F q q ( q − β * ) 2 + O ( ( P − P * ) 2 + | P − P * | | q − β * | + | q − β * | 3 ) . Solving at the two zeros first gives | q − β * | = O ( P − P * ) and then (5). □

4. Spectral Sign and Order of Contact

Fix p and write ρ = q − 1 ( β ) . In angular sector k ≥ 1 , the linearized quadratic form on regular radial factors is
Q k [ ψ ] = ∫ 0 1 r | ψ ′ | 2 + k 2 r ψ 2 − p r U β p − 1 ψ 2 d r + β ψ ( 1 ) 2 .
Differentiating the profile equation shows that ξ ( r ) = − w ′ ( ρ r ) > 0 solves − ( r ξ ′ ) ′ + r − 1 ξ − p r U β p − 1 ξ = 0 and ξ ( r ) ∼ ρ r / 2 as r ↓ 0 . Writing ψ = ξ η and integrating by parts gives
Q 1 [ ψ ] = ∫ 0 1 r ξ 2 | η ′ | 2 d r + ξ ′ ( 1 ) ξ ( 1 ) + β ψ ( 1 ) 2 .
The origin contribution vanishes for smooth regular factors and then by density. The profile equation and β = q ( ρ ) give
ξ ′ ( 1 ) + β ξ ( 1 ) = w ( ρ ) ρ { Z P ( β ) − β ( 1 − β ) } = w ( ρ ) ρ F P ( β ) .
For F P > 0 , (8) is positive definite; for F P = 0 its kernel is spanned by ξ ; for F P < 0 , testing on ξ gives a negative Rayleigh quotient. Thus the principal k = 1 eigenvalue has precisely the sign of F P . Moreover Q k = Q 1 + ( k 2 − 1 ) ∫ 0 1 ψ 2 / r d r , so all k ≥ 2 sectors are positive whenever F P ≥ 0 .
The radial sector cannot have a zero mode at any β > 0 . Every regular radial solution of the linearized interior equation is a multiple of ∂ ρ [ ρ 2 / P w ( ρ r ) ] , by initial-value uniqueness at the origin. If U ρ ( r ) = ρ 2 / P w ( ρ r ) , its Robin residual is U ρ ′ ( 1 ) + β U ρ ( 1 ) = U ρ ( 1 ) { β − q ( ρ ) } . Differentiating with β held fixed at β = q ( ρ ) yields
( ∂ ρ U ρ ) ′ ( 1 ) + β ∂ ρ U ρ ( 1 ) = − q ′ ( ρ ) U ρ ( 1 ) ≠ 0 .
To determine the order of eigenvalue contact, normalize the regular k = 1 eigenfunction as y ( r ; ρ , λ ) = r v ( r ; ρ , λ ) , v ( 0 ) = 1 . Its Volterra equation is
v ( r ) = 1 − ∫ 0 r t − 3 ∫ 0 t s 3 { p U ρ ( s ) p − 1 + λ } v ( s ) d s d t .
Set D ( ρ , λ ) = y ′ ( 1 ; ρ , λ ) + q ( ρ ) y ( 1 ; ρ , λ ) . As y ( r ; ρ , 0 ) = 2 ξ ( r ) / ρ , we have
D ( ρ , 0 ) = 2 w ( ρ ) ρ 2 F P ( q ( ρ ) ) .
At a zero of F P , differentiation of the eigenvalue equation in λ and integration against y give
− y ( 1 ) D λ ( ρ , 0 ) = ∫ 0 1 r y ( r ) 2 d r > 0 .
Indeed, with y ˙ = ∂ λ y , subtraction gives [ r ( y y ˙ ′ − y ′ y ˙ ) ] ′ = − r y 2 ; the origin term vanishes. The implicit eigenvalue λ 1 ( β ) therefore has the same order of vanishing as F P ( β ) , with positive leading factor. At p * its contact is quadratic; for p > p * both crossings are transverse.

5. Local Symmetry Breaking

At each simple first-mode zero, the higher modes are positive and the radial sector has no zero mode. In the subspace even under θ ↦ − θ , the kernel is spanned by Φ ( r , θ ) = ξ ( r ) cos θ . Fix 0 < α < 1 and let X = C even 2 , α ( B ¯ ) and Y = C even 0 , α ( B ¯ ) × C even 1 , α ( ∂ B ) . Put g ( t ) = | t | p − 1 t and
G ( β , v ) = − Δ ( U β + v ) − g ( U β + v ) , ∂ ν ( U β + v ) + β ( U β + v ) .
Here G ( β , 0 ) = 0 . Since p > p * > 6 , this map is C 2 . Its derivative A = G v ( β 0 , 0 ) is Fredholm of index zero: the Robin Laplacian with an added positive constant is an isomorphism onto Y, and the potential term is compact. Green’s identity identifies its range as the kernel of
ℓ ( f , h ) = ∫ B Φ f d x + ∫ ∂ B Φ h d σ .
Differentiating the normalized eigenpair of L β at β 0 , including its boundary condition, and pairing with Φ gives
ℓ G β v ( β 0 , 0 ) Φ = λ 1 ′ ( β 0 ) ∫ B Φ 2 d x ≠ 0 .
The Crandall–Rabinowitz theorem [2] provides a smooth local curve with β = β ( s ) and v ( s ) = s Φ + o ( s ) of nonradial solutions. Positivity follows for sufficiently small s from the positive minimum of U β 0 and continuity in C 0 .
Proof of Theorem 1. 
Take p * = P * + 1 from Proposition 1. The spectral conclusions follow from Section 4; when p < p * , F P > 0 also makes all angular forms positive. The contact and crossing statements follow from (10)–(11). The bifurcation curves follow from the preceding argument, and the asymptotic formula is (5). □

6. A Rational Interval Certificate

We describe an independently reproducible certificate. The accompanying Python script performs all evolving endpoint arithmetic on integers scaled by 10 20 , rounding each multiplication and division outward. No floating-point operation enters the sign checks.
Set q 0 = 10 − 4 and h = 10 − 6 . For H = Z P / q , the equation implies q H ′ = H [ 2 − ( P + 1 ) q − H ] / ( q + H ) . Lemma 2 gives the analytic initial enclosure
q 0 { 2 − ( P + 1 ) q 0 } < Z P ( q 0 ) < 2 q 0 .
On 0 < q < 0.7546 for P = 5.39 , 5.40 , | Z P ′ ( q ) | < 3 . Given an enclosure [ ℓ i , u i ] at q i , the solution throughout a step of length h i ≤ h lies in
R i = [ q i , q i + h i ] × [ ℓ i − 3 h , u i + 3 h ] .
The code verifies that its second coordinate stays positive and that
∂ q f P ( q , z ) = − z ( P z + 4 q − P q 2 ) ( q 2 + z ) 2 < 0 on every R i .
For fixed q, f P ( q , z ) is monotone in z, with direction determined by 2 − P q . Consequently the minimum on R i is the smaller of f P ( q i + h i , ℓ i − 3 h ) and f P ( q i + h i , u i + 3 h ) , and the maximum is the larger of the corresponding two values at q i . We update ℓ i + 1 = ℓ i + h i min R i f P and u i + 1 = u i + h i max R i f P , with outward rounding. The endpoint b P is enclosed by integer square root, and the final enclosure is widened by 3 times its endpoint uncertainty.
The resulting conservative rational bounds are
P enclosure for G ( P ) certified sign
5.39 ( 0.000144 , 0.000153 ) positive
5.40 ( − 0.001011 , − 0.001002 ) negative
The inequalities in the table are deliberately weaker than the program’s exact rational endpoints. They suffice to establish 6.39 < p * < 6.40 without interpreting a plotted or floating-point root as a proof.
The accompanying script certifiedthreshold.py uses only the Python standard library (version 3.8 or later). Run python3 certifiedthreshold.py to reproduce the certified bounds; READMEthreshold.md documents the checks and expected output.
Remark 1. 
This threshold classifies thefirst angular mode; the result does not classify possible higher-mode degeneracies for p > p * . The local bifurcation assertion does not place a nonradial solution at the exact limiting parameter. The bound on p * is computer assisted, while the existence, uniqueness, crossing count and fold argument are analytic once the two certified signs are given.

References

  1. M. Chen, M. Grossi and Q. Li, Uniqueness and nondegeneracy of positive solutions to elliptic equations with Robin boundary conditions, arXiv:2607.29461 (2026). https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.29461.
  2. M. G. Crandall and P. H. Rabinowitz, Bifurcation from simple eigenvalues, J. Funct. Anal. 8 (1971), 321–340. [CrossRef]
  3. R. Zeraoulia, Symmetry breaking for the planar Lane–Emden equation with Robin boundary conditions, Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 95 (2027), 104752. [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.