Submitted:
21 August 2026
Posted:
24 August 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
The market rise of innovative vegan food products has been driven by global dietary trends moving toward plant-rich models. Nevertheless, new xenobiotics, such as microplastics (MPs), may be introduced via plastic packaging and multi-step industrial processing. Five commercial vegan items—seitan, quinoa burgers, soy desserts, vegan “Parmesan,” and vegan pesto sauce—that were gathered from Spanish, French, and Italian markets (N=15) were statistically assessed for MP contamination. MP contamination levels were primarily governed by processing intensity and primary packaging rather than botanical origin. While liquid/semi-solid matrices indicated significantly lower concentrations (0.3–4.7 MPs/10 g), solid ultra-processed meat substitutes had the most significant MP burdens (5.3–9.3 MPs/10 g). Recovery (> 85–91%) was mainly by small fragments (< 100 μm). Commodity thermoplastics and engineering polymers generated from machinery have been confirmed by polymer identification. Predefined consumption assumptions of vegan diets yield significant yearly MPs concentrations (approximately 350,000–400,000 MPs/year), according to estimated daily intake. In order to establish future food safety regulations and risk management procedures in the veg-based sector. This exploratory pilot study provides preliminary baseline information on MP contamination in the selected commercial vegan food categories and markets.

Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Gathering Samples
2.2. Sample Preparation
2.3. Microplastic Analysis
2.4. Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC)
2.5. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Comparative MP Analysis Among All Vegan Food for Each Countries
3.2. Size Distribution and Morphological Characteristics of Recovered MPs
- Extremely processed foods (vegan seitan with veggies and a vegan quinoa burger): The MPs recovered from these solid matrices demonstrated the greatest rates of structural damage and topological degradation [17]. SEM images indicated complex microfractures, localised porosity, ragged angular edges, and longitudinal cracks [26]. The extreme heat and mechanical stress (cereal/legume grinding, high-speed mixing, and thermo-mechanical extrusion) needed to texturize the plant proteins causes these topographic flaws [27].
- Analogous fat and dairy matrix (vegan “Parmesan” cheese): Film-like morphotypes (lamellar films) and clustering fragments in the 51–100 μm range were significantly present in MPs recovered from vegan “Parmesan” cheese [28,43]. SEM analysis revealed thin sheets with damaged edges, fractures, and folds [32]. This pattern shows how friction and the negative pressure of vacuum packaging on the lipid-rich surface (coconut oil) induce tiny layers to mechanically separate from the plastic wrapper [31] (Figure 1).
- Emulsified semi-solid matrix (vegan pesto sauce): Smaller fragments (< 50 μm) were indicative of MPs isolated in the vegan pesto sauce [27]. When processing hard botanical components (nuts, pine nuts, and basil), hydraulic shear and abrasive cutting of the crushing blades resulted in angular and uneven surfaces, as illustrated in SEM images [26] (Figure 1).
- Liquid/semi-solid matrix (Vegan soy dessert): The majority of the MPs identified in the vegan soy dessert belonged to the fine particle size fraction (1–50 μm) [27]. Due to fluid friction and high-speed pumping in the pasteurization/UHT treatment and packaging processes, SEM analysis revealed MPs with abrasive shapes [36] (Figure 1).
4. Discussion
4.1. Impact of Food Matrix Complexity, Industrial Processing, and Packaging on MP Abundance
4.2. Size Distribution, Morphological Characteristics, and Polymer Signatures as Indicators of Contamination Pathways
4.2.1. Surface Morphology (SEM) and Its Mechanistic Implications in Vegan Food Items
4.3. Comparative Polymer Signatures of Conventional Non-Vegan and Vegan Substitutes Foods
4.4. Exploratory Scenario–Based Dietary Exposure Assessment
4.5. Limitations of the Study
5. Future Perspectives
6. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| AFM–Raman | Atomic Force Microscopy-Raman |
| BW | Body Weight |
| CIs | Confidence Intervals |
| DDA | Degree of Deacetylation |
| EDCs | Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals |
| EDI | Estimated Daily Intake |
| EVA | Ethylene-Vinyl Acetate |
| FIRs | Food Ingestion Rates |
| GHGE | Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions |
| GLPs | Good Field and Laboratory Practices |
| HMTE | High-Moisture Thermal Extrusion |
| KBr | Potassium Bromide |
| MPs | Microplastics |
| MW | Molecular Weight |
| NCDs | Non-Communicable Diseases |
| NPs | Nanoplastics |
| PA | Polyamide |
| PCC | Procambarus Clarkii Chitosan |
| PE | Polyethylene |
| PES | Polyester |
| PET | Polyethylene Terephthalate |
| PP | Polypropylene |
| PS | Polystyrene |
| PTFE | Polytetrafluoroethylene |
| PU | Polyurethane |
| ROS | Reactive Oxygen Species |
| SBR | Styrene-Butadiene Rubber |
| SEM | Scanning Electron Microscopy |
| SGF | Simulated Gastric Fluid |
| UAM | Autonomous University of Madrid |
| µFTIR | Micro–Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometry |
| µRaman | Micro–Raman Spectroscopy |
References
- Sturm, L.; Klausmann, L.; Seper-Nagl, K.; Alber, O.; Griesbacher, A.; Kühn, T.; Wagner, K. H. A path to sustainable and healthy diets: modeling ovo-lacto-vegetarian food-based dietary guidelines. Front. Nutr. 13 2026, 1754132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, B.; Winterstein, J.; Habisch, A. Cultural influences on vegetarian food consumption: insights from Germany and Thailand using the motivation-opportunity-ability model. Brit. Food J. 2026, 128(13), 206–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Craig, W. J. Health effects of vegan diets. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009, 89(5), 1627S–1633S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Awasthi, M. K.; Kumar, V.; Hellwig, C.; Wikandari, R.; Harirchi, S.; Sar, T.; Taherzadeh, M. J. Filamentous fungi for sustainable vegan food production systems within a circular economy: Present status and future prospects. Food Res. Int. 2023, 164, 112318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Winkelmair, A.; Schroter, F. A.; Jansen, P. Vegetarian and sustainable food consumption behavior: Exploring the relation to explicit and implicit attitudes toward vegetarian foods and dispositional mindfulness. Appetite 2025, 206, 107847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kautish, P.; Thaichon, P.; Soni, P. Environmental values and sustainability: Mediating role of nature connectedness, and love for nature toward vegan food consumption. J. Consum. Behav. 2024, 23(3), 1130–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Plastics Europe. Plastics—The fast facts 2025 plastics Europe, Brussels. 2025. Available online: https://plasticseurope.org/knowledge-hub/plastics-the-fast-facts-2025/ (accessed on 11 August 2026).
- Herman, A.; O’Neill, K. The geographies of veganism: Exploring the complex entanglements of places, plants, peoples, and profits through vegan food practices. Prog. Environ. Geogr. 2025, 4(1), 92–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Estévez, M.; Arjona, A.; Sánchez-Terrón, G.; Molina-Infante, J.; Martínez, R. Ultra-processed vegan foods: Healthy alternatives to animal-source foods or avoidable junk? J. Food Sci. 2024, 89(11), 7008–7021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kahleova, H.; Znayenko-Miller, T.; Jayaraman, A.; Motoa, G.; Chiavaroli, L.; Holubkov, R.; Barnard, N. D. Vegan diet, processed foods, and body weight: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. Nutr. Metab. 2025, 22(1), 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quevedo-Olaya, J. L.; Schmiele, M.; Correa, M. J. Potential of Andean grains as substitutes for animal proteins in vegetarian and vegan diets: A nutritional and functional analysis. Foods 2025, 14(17), 2987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casella, C.; Sol, D.; Laca, A.; Díaz, M. Microplastics in sewage sludge: a review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30(23), 63382–63415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casella, C.; Sol, D.; Laca, A.; Díaz, M. Microplastic retention in secondary sewage sludge: characterization and influence of solid concentration. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(7), 3557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hooge, A.; Hauggaard-Nielsen, H.; Heinze, W. M.; Lyngsie, G.; Ramos, T. M.; Sandgaard, M. H.; Syberg, K. Fate of microplastics in sewage sludge and in agricultural soils. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2023, 166, 117184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harley-Nyang, D.; Memon, F. A.; Jones, N.; Galloway, T. Investigation and analysis of microplastics in sewage sludge and biosolids: A case study from one wastewater treatment works in the UK. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 823, 153735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cornelli, U.; Casella, C.; Belcaro, G.; Cesarone, M. R.; Marucci, S.; Rondanelli, M.; Zanoni, G. Definition of emerging microplastic syndrome based on clinical and epidemiological evidence: A narrative review. Microplastics 2025, 4(4), 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cornelli, U.; Recchia, M.; Casella, C. The Food Microplastic Pyramid (FOMIC-Py) as a Novel Framework for Prioritizing Dietary Exposure and Industrial Processing Impact: An Italian North-South Exposure Model. Toxics 2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ohlau, M.; Spiller, A.; Risius, A. Plant-based diets are not enough? Understanding the consumption of plant-based meat alternatives along ultra-processed foods in different dietary patterns in Germany. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 852936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daas, M. C.; Vellinga, R. E.; Pinho, M. G. M.; Boer, J. M.; Verschuren, W. M.; van Der Schouw, Y. T.; Biesbroek, S. The role of ultra-processed foods in plant-based diets: associations with human health and environmental sustainability. Eur. J. Nutr. 2024, 63(8), 2957–2973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Louie, J. C. Y. Are all ultra-processed foods bad? A critical review of the NOVA classification system. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2025, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Steele, E. M.; O’Connor, L. E.; Juul, F.; Khandpur, N.; Baraldi, L. G.; Monteiro, C. A.; Herrick, K. A. Identifying and estimating ultraprocessed food intake in the US NHANES according to the Nova classification system of food processing. J. Nutr. 2023, 153(1), 225–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casella, C.; Sol, D.; Laca, A.; Díaz, M. Microplastic retention in secondary sewage sludge: characterization and influence of solid concentration. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(7), 3557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saqib, M.; Fan, Y.; Hao, R.; Zhang, B. Optical imaging of nanoscale electrochemical interfaces in energy applications. Nano Energy 2021, 90, 106539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borriello, L.; Scivicco, M.; Cacciola, N. A.; Esposito, F.; Severino, L.; Cirillo, T. Microplastics, a global issue: human exposure through environmental and dietary sources. Foods 2023, 12(18), 3396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eze, C. G.; Nwankwo, C. E.; Dey, S.; Sundaramurthy, S.; Okeke, E. S. Food chain microplastics contamination and impact on human health: a review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2024, 22(4), 1889–1927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Fiore, C.; Maio, M.; Avino, P. Food processing and microplastics. In Microplastics in Agriculture and Food Science; Academic Press, 2025; pp. 245–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, G.; Faikhaw, O.; Juan, B.; Reemtsma, T. Systematic evaluation of food design, treatments, packaging and storage conditions on microplastic concentrations in complex matrices. J. Hazard. Mater. Adv. 2025, 100972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Macan Schönleben, A.; den Ouden, F.; Yin, S.; Fransen, E.; Bosschaerts, S.; Andjelkovic, M.; Poma, G. Organophosphorus flame retardant, phthalate, and alternative plasticizer contamination in novel plant-based food: a food safety investigation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2025, 59(18), 9209–9220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Milne, M. H.; De Frond, H.; Rochman, C. M.; Mallos, N. J.; Leonard, G. H.; Baechler, B. R. Exposure of US adults to microplastics from commonly-consumed proteins. Environ. Pollut. 2024, 343, 123233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jadhav, E. B.; Sankhla, M. S.; Bhat, R. A.; Bhagat, D. S. Microplastics from food packaging: An overview of human consumption, health threats, and alternative solutions. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. 2021, 16, 100608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panou, A.; Karabagias, I. K. Migration and safety aspects of plastic food packaging materials: Need for reconsideration? Coatings 2024, 14(2), 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaseke, T.; Lujic, T.; Cirkovic Velickovic, T. Nano-and microplastics migration from plastic food packaging into dairy products: impact on nutrient digestion, absorption, and metabolism. Foods 2023, 12(16), 3043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, X.; Dai, H.; He, L. Migration testing of microplastics from selected water and food containers by Raman microscopy. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 462, 132798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kedzierski, M.; Lechat, B.; Sire, O.; Le Maguer, G.; Le Tilly, V.; Bruzaud, S. Microplastic contamination of packaged meat: Occurrence and associated risks. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2020, 24, 100489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Velebit, B.; Janković, V.; Milojević, L.; Baltić, T.; Ćirić, J. Overview of microplastics in the meat: Occurrence, detection methods and health effects. Meat Technol. 2023, 64(2), 36–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, P. Microplastic contamination in food processing: Role of packaging materials. Food Sci. Eng. 2024, 271–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prata, J. C.; Da Costa, J. P.; Lopes, I.; Duarte, A. C.; Rocha-Santos, T. Environmental exposure to microplastics: An overview on possible human health effects. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 702, 134455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prata, J. C. Microplastics and human health: Integrating pharmacokinetics. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci.Technol. 2023, 53(16), 1489–1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marfella, R.; Prattichizzo, F.; Sardu, C.; Fulgenzi, G.; Graciotti, L.; Spadoni, T.; Paolisso, G. Microplastics and nanoplastics in atheromas and cardiovascular events. New Eng. J. Med. 2024, 390(10), 900–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casella, C.; Cornelli, U.; Ballaz, S.; Recchia, M.; Zanoni, G.; Ramos-Guerrero, L. Preliminary study on PCC-chitosan’s ability to enhance microplastic excretion in human stools from healthy volunteers. Foods 2025, 14(13), 2190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casella, C.; Cornelli, U.; Schiavi, S.; Taglietti, A.; Luque, R.; Zanoni, G. Mechanistic insights into polystyrene nanoplastic sequestration by a Procambarus clarkii-derived chitosan hydrogel in simulated gastric fluid: An in vitro study. Food Hydrocoll. 2026, 112910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rondanelli, M.; Perna, S.; Porta, M. D.; Lombardoni, F.; Patelli, Z.; Nichetti, M.; Cazzola, R. Modification of metabolic syndrome parameters following the administration of polyglucosamine L112: results of a subgroup analysis of subjects enrolled in a double blind randomised placebo controlled clinical investigation. BMC Nutr. 2025, 11(1), 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Winkler, A. S.; Cherubini, A.; Rusconi, F.; Santo, N.; Madaschi, L.; Pistoni, C.; Bacchetta, R. Human airway organoids and microplastic fibers: A new exposure model for emerging contaminants. Environ. Int. 2022, 163, 107200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]



| Vegan food item | Cross–Country Comparison (Mean MP concentration) | Exploratory Statistical Comparison (p–value)* |
| Seitan with vegetables | Italy (7.3) ≈ Spain (7.0) > France (5.3) | No clear difference detected (p> 0.05) |
| Plant–Based / Quinoa Burgers | Italy (9.3) = Spain (9.3) > France (6.7) | Exploratory trend (p= 0.08) |
| Vegan “Parmesan”–Style Cheese | Italy (5.3) = France (5.3) ≈ Spain (4.7) | No difference detected (p= 0.82) |
| Vegan Pesto Sauce | Italy (4.7) > France (3.7) > Spain (1.7) | Exploratory difference (p< 0.05) (Italy vs Spain) |
| Soy–based Dessert | France (3.3) ≈ Italy (2.6) > Spain (0.3) | Exploratory difference (p< 0.01) (France/Italy vs Spain) |
| *Values represent the artihmetic mean of MPs recovered per 10 g of sample. Statistical significance was determined using two–tailed ANOVA and post–hoc pairwise Tukey’s HSD test (N= 5 per country). Given the limited number of independent commercial products per country (N = 5), p-values are reported as exploratory indicators and should not be interpreted as definitive evidence of market-level differences. | ||
| Food item |
CMP (MP/g) |
Serving Burden (MPs/serving) | Individual EDI (MPs/kgday) | Main MPs | Main Toxicological Effects |
| Quinoa / tomato burger | 5.4 | 540.0 (100 g) | 7.71 | PE, PP | Physical micro–abrasion of the intestinal mucosa, mucosal inflammation, and sorptive carrying of lipophilic environmental contaminants |
| Seitan with vegetables |
3.1 | 372.0 (120 g) | 5.31 | EVA, PU | Chemical degradation under gastric acidic conditions, leaching of reactive isocyanate monomers, vinyl acetate residues, and plasticizers triggering oxidative stress |
| Vegan Pesto sauce | 12.5 | 312.5 (25 g) | 4.46 | PET, PS | “Trojan Horse” effect: the lipid–rich phase accelerates intestinal desorption of pre–adsorbed endocrine–disrupting chemical (phthalates, Bisphenol–A) |
| Vegan “Parmesan” cheese |
8.2 | 246.0 (30 g) | 8.2 | PE, PET | Disruption of intestinal tight–junction proteins (ZO–1), increasing gut permeability (“leaky gut”) and triggering GALT immune activation |
| Soy–based dessert |
0.8 | 100.0 (125 g) | 0.8 | PE, PE | Contribution to chronic low–dose background exposure; systemic translocation in tiny particle fractions (< 20 μm) |
|
Hypothetical Cumulative Scenario* (Convenience diet) |
13.6 – 15.6 | EVA, PE, PET, PP, PS, PU |
Systemic translocation (via M cells in Peyer’s patches), organ bio–accumulation (i.e., liver, kidneys, endothelium), chronic inflammation, and ROS–mediated endothelial dysfunction |
||
| *Scenario-based calculation using predefined consumption assumptions for selected products included in this study. This value is not intended to represent illustrative scenariol or population-level vegan dietary exposure | |||||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).