Preprint
Review

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Classic and Novel Echocardiographic Signs: A Review

Submitted:

30 August 2026

Posted:

01 September 2026

Read the latest preprint version here

Abstract
Echocardiography is an important imaging modality in the assessment of cardiovascular diseases. Several echocardiographic signs have been described to aid in the diagnosis of specific clinical conditions and to help clinicians remember the key sonographic features. This review summarizes five classic signs in echocardiography, including the McConnell's Sign, the D-Sign, the 60:60 Sign, the SAM Sign, and the Swinging Heart Sign, as well as three novel signs, the Three Pipes Sign, the LTS Sign, and the LTI Sign. This review aims to provide an overview of the classic echocardiographic signs, focusing on their naming logics, definitions, and clinical implications to facilitate a better understanding of them, and to first propose three novel signs, the Three Pipes Sign, the LTS Sign, and the LTI Sign, which may aid in diagnosis and serve as teaching aids in echocardiography.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Echocardiography is a first-line imaging tool for assessing cardiovascular diseases [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Echocardiographic signs are specific patterns or findings on echocardiography that have been described to aid in diagnosis, help clinicians remember key features, and serve as teaching tools. These signs are often named after several conventions, including metaphors, eponyms, descriptive features, acronyms, etc. This paper aims to provide an overview of classic signs in echocardiography, including the McConnell’s Sign, the D-Sign, the 60:60 Sign, the SAM Sign, and the Swinging Heart Sign, focusing on their naming logics, definitions, and clinical implications to facilitate a better understanding of classic echocardiographic signs, and to first propose three novel signs, the Three Pipes Sign, the LTS Sign, and the LTI sign, which may aid in diagnosis and serve as teaching aids in echocardiography.

2. Classic Echocardiographic Signs

We provide an overview of classic echocardiographic signs, including McConnell’s Sign, the D-Sign, the 60:60 Sign, the SAM Sign, and the Swinging Heart Sign. These signs are associated with a spectrum of cardiovascular conditions, including acute pulmonary embolism, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and pericardial effusion. For each sign, we review its naming logic, definition, and clinical implications.

2.1. McConnell’s Sign

Naming logic: McConnell’s Sign is named after its original describer, first described by McConnell et al. in 1996 [10].
Definition: McConnell’s Sign refers to an echocardiographic finding of segmental right ventricular wall motion abnormality with apical sparing [11,12]. First described by McConnell et al. in 1996 [10], it is an echocardiographic sign highly specific for acute pulmonary embolism and may guide rapid intervention when other testing is not feasible.
Clinical implications: McConnell’s Sign is specific for acute pulmonary embolism. It can be demonstrated at the bedside with a transthoracic echocardiogram and may guide therapeutic intervention [11,12,13,14,15].

2.2. The D-Sign

Naming logic: the D-Sign is named for its resemblance to the letter “D” [16].
Definition: The D-Sign is when the left ventricle assumes the shape of the letter “D” instead of its normal circular appearance [16]. It occurs when early diastolic right ventricular pressure exceeds that of the left ventricle and indicates right ventricular pressure overload.
Clinical implications: The D-Sign is an echocardiographic marker of right ventricular pressure overload and can be seen in acute right ventricular failure, RV dilatation, pulmonary embolism, or chronic pulmonary hypertension [17,18].

2.3. The 60/60 Sign

Naming logic: The 60:60 Sign is named for the two numerical cutoff values it comprises.
Definition: The 60/60 Sign is a 2D transthoracic echocardiographic finding defined by the combination of a pulmonary acceleration time of less than 60 ms and a tricuspid regurgitation jet gradient of less than 60 mmHg. It is highly specific but poorly sensitive for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism [19,20].
Clinical implications: The 60/60-Sign is highly specific for pulmonary embolism. When present, it can confirm the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism and support immediate clinical decision-making, but its low sensitivity means it cannot be used to exclude the diagnosis. Additionally, it serves as an independent predictor of 30-day mortality, warranting heightened clinical vigilance and more aggressive management in positive cases [21,22].

2.4. The SAM Sign

Naming logic: The SAM Sign is named as an abbreviation for “systolic anterior motion”.
Definition: The SAM Sign is the abbreviation for “systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve.” It refers to the abnormal movement of the anterior mitral valve leaflet toward the interventricular septum during systole, which obstructs the left ventricular outflow tract. This is a classic echocardiographic finding in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy [23,24,25].
Clinical implications:
This sign can serve as important diagnostic evidence for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. It can also be observed after aortic valve replacement, mitral valve repair, and acute myocardial infarction [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30].

2.5. The Swinging Heart Sign

Naming logic: The Swinging Heart Sign is named for the descriptive appearance of the heart swinging within a large pericardial effusion.
Definition: The Swinging Heart Sign is diagnosed when a standard view of the left ventricle reveals that the right ventricular anterior wall, the interventricular septum, and the left ventricular posterior wall all move in the same direction throughout the cardiac cycle. Often, identification of specific valvular or other intracardiac structures is not possible [31].
Clinical implications: The swinging heart pattern appears to be a reliable marker of cardiac tamponade in the setting of a large pericardial effusion, except in those patients with intrapericardial lesions which mechanically limit cardiac motion [32,33,34,35,36,37,38].
In summary, these five classic echocardiographic signs each carry important diagnostic value in specific cardiovascular conditions. McConnell’s Sign, the D-Sign, and the 60:60 Sign serve as important clues for pulmonary embolism, with the 60/60 Sign additionally providing prognostic information regarding 30-day mortality. The SAM Sign is a key diagnostic feature of obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, while the Swinging Heart Sign is a reliable marker of cardiac tamponade in the setting of large pericardial effusion. Together, these signs not only facilitate rapid recognition and differential diagnosis of conditions such as pulmonary embolism, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and pericardial effusion, but also serve as effective teaching tools for consolidating the key echocardiographic manifestations of these diseases. The summary of classic echocardiographic signs is shown in Table 1.

3. Novel Echocardiographic Signs

We first propose two novel echocardiographic signs, the Three Pipes Sign and the LTS Sign, which are associated with coarctation of the descending aorta and dilated cardiomyopathy, respectively. For each sign, we describe its naming logic, definition, and clinical implications.

3.1. The Three Pipes Sign

We propose the “Three Pipes Sign” as a novel sonographic sign to aid in the recognition of the suprasternal long-axis view of the aortic arch when the three major branches are adequately displayed, and to assist in the echocardiographic localization and measurement of coarctation of the descending aorta based on the relationship of the narrowing to these three branches.
Naming logic: The sign is named for its descriptive appearance, as the three major branches of the aortic arch resemble three pipes.
Definition: The “Three Pipes Sign” refers to the sonographic appearance of the suprasternal long-axis view of the aortic arch in which the three major branches, namely the brachiocephalic trunk, left common carotid artery, and left subclavian artery, may be visualized arising from the aortic arch, appearing as three parallel or slightly diverging tubular structures, together resembling three pipes.
Clinical implications: The “Three Pipes Sign” serves three purposes: (1) Recognition of the scanning plane: The sign provides a simple, intuitive pattern of three tubular structures arising from the aortic arch, which may help sonographers, particularly trainees, recognize the suprasternal long-axis view of the aortic arch when the three branches are adequately displayed. (2) Assessment of aortic anomalies: Adequate display of the three branches provides the anatomical framework for the echocardiographic localization and measurement of coarctation of the descending aorta. The location of coarctation is defined by its relationship to the innominate artery, left common carotid artery, and left subclavian artery. Thus, the “Three Pipes Sign” provides the necessary anatomical guide for localizing coarctation of the descending aorta. (3) Scanning quality control: The sign may help confirm adequate visualization of the aortic arch and its three major branches.

3.2. The LTS Sign

We propose the “LTS” as a novel sonographic sign for dilated cardiomyopathy.
Naming logic: LTS is an abbreviation for the “Large-Thin-Small” triad.
Definition: The “LTS” refers to the echocardiographic appearance of dilated cardiomyopathy characterized by three features: (1) large ventricular cavity, (2) thin interventricular septum, and (3) small mitral valve orifice, the initials of which yield the “Large-Thin-Small” triad: LTS.
Clinical implications: The “LTS” serves two purposes: (1) Recognition of dilated cardiomyopathy: The sign provides a simple mnemonic: Large, Thin, Small. This may help echocardiographers, particularly trainees, recognize the typical echocardiographic features of dilated cardiomyopathy. (2) Teaching tool: The sign offers trainees a simple mnemonic to help them remember the three core features.

3.3. The LTI Sign

We propose the “LTI” as a novel sonographic sign for endocardial fibroelastosis.
Naming logic: LTI is an abbreviation for the “Large-Thick-Impaired” triad.
Definition: The “LTI” refers to the echocardiographic appearance of endocardial fibroelastosis characterized by three features: (1) large ventricular cavity, (2) thick endocardium, and (3) impaired ventricular function, the initials of which yield the “Large-Thick-Impaired” triad: LTI.
Clinical implications: The “LTI” serves two purposes: (1) Recognition of endocardial fibroelastosis: The sign provides a simple mnemonic: Large, Thick, Impaired. This may assist echocardiographers, especially trainees, in recognizing the characteristic echocardiographic features of endocardial fibroelastosis. (2) Teaching tool: The sign provides trainees with an easy mnemonic to help them remember the three core features.
In summary, the Three Pipes Sign, the LTS Sign, and the LTI Sign are three novel echocardiographic signs that may aid in diagnosis and serve as teaching aids. The Three Pipes Sign provides a simple, intuitive pattern for recognizing the suprasternal long-axis view of the aortic arch when the three major branches are adequately displayed. It may serve as a useful teaching tool for trainees, as a sonographic guide for the localization and measurement of coarctation of the descending aorta based on the relationship of the coarctation to the three branches, and as an aid in scanning quality control. The LTS Sign summarizes the three core echocardiographic features of dilated cardiomyopathy, namely large ventricular cavity, thin interventricular septum, and small mitral valve orifice, into a memorable mnemonic. It may serve as a useful teaching tool for trainees and as an aid in echocardiographic evaluation. The LTI Sign summarizes the three characteristic echocardiographic features of endocardial fibroelastosis, including large ventricular cavity, thick endocardium, and impaired ventricular function, into a memorable mnemonic. It may serve as a helpful teaching tool for trainees and an aid in echocardiographic assessment. The signs are simple, straightforward, and may be valuable for trainees in learning and remembering key sonographic findings. The summary of novel echocardiographic signs is shown in Table 2.

4. Limitations

This review has several limitations. First, the three novel signs are proposed based on established sonographic anatomy and echocardiographic knowledge, and their clinical utility will require further assessment in routine practice. Second, this review is not a systematic review, and the selection of signs is based on the authors’ judgment rather than a comprehensive literature search.

5. Future Directions

Looking forward, echocardiography continues to evolve with advances in technology and imaging techniques. We hope that more novel, simple, and memorable echocardiographic signs will be proposed to aid in the recognition of important scanning planes, the identification of specific cardiovascular conditions, and the teaching of echocardiography to trainees. With the increasing integration of artificial intelligence in echocardiography, there may be opportunities to automatically detect these signs, further enhancing their clinical utility and educational value.
Inspired by the educational value of echocardiographic signs, we also note that terminological precision in echocardiographic parameters may have implications for teaching. Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) is one such parameter that warrants consideration. While it is a well-established parameter for the measurement of right ventricular longitudinal systolic function, its name does not explicitly indicate that the measured excursion is longitudinal. A more precise term, TAPSLE, which is an abbreviation for tricuspid annular plane systolic longitudinal excursion, may therefore be considered to better reflect the longitudinal nature of this parameter and to enhance teaching and clinical communication. We encourage further discussion among the echocardiography community on the potential adoption of TAPSLE in practice.

6. Conclusion

Echocardiographic signs help clinicians recognize characteristic imaging patterns and facilitate accurate diagnosis. In this review, we have summarized five classic echocardiographic signs, namely McConnell’s Sign, the D-Sign, the 60:60 Sign, the SAM Sign, and the Swinging Heart Sign, each of which carries important diagnostic value in specific cardiovascular conditions. We have also first proposed three novel signs, the Three Pipes Sign, the LTS Sign, and the LTI Sign, which may aid in the recognition of the suprasternal long-axis view of the aortic arch, the echocardiographic features of dilated cardiomyopathy, and those of endocardial fibroelastosis, respectively. For each sign, we have described its naming logic, definition, and clinical implications, highlighting how these signs may serve not only as diagnostic clues but also as effective teaching aids. We hope that this review facilitates a better understanding of classic echocardiographic signs and encourages the continued development of simple, memorable signs to enhance both clinical practice and echocardiography education.

AI Disclosure

The author used AI-assisted language tools solely for wording and grammar refinement. All intellectual content is the sole work of the author.

Ethics Statement

This review does not involve original patient data or human subjects. Ethical approval is not required.

Conflict of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sehly, A.; Jaltotage, B.; He, A.; Maiorana, A.; Ihdayhid, A.R.; Rajwani, A.; Dwivedi, G. Artificial Intelligence in Echocardiography: The Time is Now. Rev. Cardiovasc. Med. 2022, 23, 256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Van Berendoncks, A.; Rodriguez Palomares, J.; De Backer, J. How to Use Cardiovascular Imaging in Pregnancy. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2026, e018658. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Kaneko, T.; Kagiyama, N.; Nakamura, Y.; Hirasawa, T.; Murata, A.; Morimoto, R.; Miyazaki, S.; Minamino, T. Effectiveness of real-time tele-ultrasound for echocardiography in resource-limited medical teams. J. Echocardiogr. 2022, 20, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Liu, B.; Chang, H.; Yang, D.; Yang, F.; Wang, Q.; Deng, Y.; Li, L.; Lv, W.; Zhang, B.; Yu, L.; et al. A deep learning framework assisted echocardiography with diagnosis, lesion localization, phenogrouping heterogeneous disease, and anomaly detection. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Steffani, S.; Piscione, M.; Gaudio, D.; Meghnagi, G.; Crignola, G.G.; Asmundo, L.; Tagliati, C.; Laudazi, M.; Chiocchi, M. Calculation of Ejection Fraction Using Cardiac Computed Tomography: Clinical Evolution, Reliability, and Technological Challenges-A Narrative Review. Medicina 2026, 62, 1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ahn, H.S.; Kim, H.K.; Park, E.A.; Lee, W.; Park, J.H.; Sohn, D.W. Isolated, broad-based apical diverticulum: Cardiac magnetic resonance is a “terminator” of cardiac imaging modality for the evaluation of cardiac apex. Korean Circ. J. 2013, 43, 702–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. De Luca, A.; Rizzi, J.G.; Caiffa, T.; Zecchin, M.; Cameli, M.; Agricola, E.; Piccione, M.C.; Manganaro, R.; Barison, A.; Di Bella, G.; et al. How to Do Echo in a Multimodality Approach to Assess the Risk of Sudden Death: A Consensus Statement of the Italian Society of Echocardiography and Cardiovascular Imaging. J. Cardiovasc. Echogr. 2025, 35, 183–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Malik, S.B.; Chen, N.; Parker, R.A., 3rd; Hsu, J.Y. Transthoracic Echocardiography: Pitfalls and Limitations as Delineated at Cardiac CT and MR Imaging. Radiographics 2017, 37, 383–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Mahmood, A.; Ramesh, J.; Patel, D.S.; Naseem, M.; Shah, R.K.; Pate, H.; Frishman, W.H.; Aronow, W.S. Multimodality Imaging in Inflammatory Cardiac Disease. Cardiol. Rev. 2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. McConnell, M.V.; Solomon, S.D.; Rayan, M.E.; Come, P.C.; Goldhaber, S.Z.; Lee, R.T. Regional right ventricular dysfunction detected by echocardiography in acute pulmonary embolism. Am. J. Cardiol. 1996, 78, 469–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Malerba, C.; Arcari, L.; Camastra, G.; Ciolina, F.; Badagliacca, R.; Sbarbati, S.; Cacciotti, L. Multimodality Imaging Evaluation of Reverse McConnell’s Sign and Right Ventricular Apical Thrombosis in Acute Pulmonary Embolism. Heart Views 2025, 26, 198–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Patel, V.I.; Miles, M.; Shahangian, S.; Javien, J. McConnell’s sign: Echocardiography in the management of acute pulmonary embolism. Clin. Case Rep. 2021, 9, e04994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kansara, T.; Quesada, F.; Park, H.; Ghosh, K.; Saeed, M. McConnell’s Sign Still Holds Its Value: A Lesson Learned from Two Cases. Cureus 2019, 11, e6240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Rafie, N.; Foley, D.A.; Ripoll, J.G.; Booth-Kowalczyk, M.L.; Arghami, A.; Pochettino, A.; Michelena, H.I. McConnell’s Sign Is Not Always Pulmonary Embolism: The Importance of Right Ventricular Ischemia. JACC Case Rep. 2022, 4, 802–807. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Lodato, J.A.; Ward, R.P.; Lang, R.M. Echocardiographic predictors of pulmonary embolism in patients referred for helical CT. Echocardiography 2008, 25, 584–590, Erratum in Echocardiography 2008, 25, ii. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Johnkutty, M.; Gada, K.; Ahmad, S. Detection of right atrial thrombus in a woman with pulmonary embolism and right heart compromise by bedside echocardiography. Respir. Med. Case Rep. 2022, 40, 101744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Boubaker, M.A. Acute Right Ventricular Failure Triggered by Excessive Fluid Resuscitation in Septic Shock. Case Rep. Med. 2026, 2026, 4817187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Cherian, N.; Reynard, C.; Body, R. Focused echocardiography in COVID-19: An unusual case of acute right ventricular dysfunction. Ultrasound 2020, 28, 229–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Shah, B.R.; Velamakanni, S.M.; Patel, A.; Khadkikar, G.; Patel, T.M.; Shah, S.C. Analysis of the 60/60 Sign and Other Right Ventricular Parameters by 2D Transthoracic Echocardiography as Adjuncts to Diagnosis of Acute Pulmonary Embolism. Cureus 2021, 13, e13800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Kurzyna, M.; Torbicki, A.; Pruszczyk, P.; Burakowska, B.; Fijałkowska, A.; Kober, J.; Oniszh, K.; Kuca, P.; Tomkowski, W.; Burakowski, J. Disturbed right ventricular ejection pattern as a new Doppler echocardiographic sign of acute pulmonary embolism. Am. J. Cardiol. 2002, 90, 507–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Falster, C.; Egholm, G.; Wiig, R.; Poulsen, M.K.; Møller, J.E.; Posth, S.; Brabrand, M.; Laursen, C.B. Diagnostic Accuracy of a Bespoke Multiorgan Ultrasound Approach in Suspected Pulmonary Embolism. Ultrasound Int. Open 2023, 8, E59–E67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Wiliński, J.; Skwarek, A.; Borek, R.; Chukwu, O.; Ciuk, K.; Stolarz-Skrzypek, K.; Rajzer, M. Subcostal echocardiographic assessment of tricuspid annular kick (SEATAK): A novel independent predictor of 30-day mortality in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Kardiol. Pol. 2022, 80, 1127–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Pfeiffer, B.; Rigopoulos, A.; Seggewiß, H. Echokontrastmittelgesteuerte Alkoholablation bei hypertropher obstruktiver Kardiomyopathie mit neuem Echokontrastmittel [Myocardial contrast echocardiography guided alcohol septal ablation in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy with a new echocardiographic contrast agent]. Dtsch. Med. Wochenschr. 2012, 137, 2093–2096. (In German) [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Lazzeroni, E.; Domenicucci, S.; Das, S.; ten Cate, F.; Roelandt, J. Cardiomiopatia ipertrofica: Distribuzione dell’ipertrofia valutata con ecocardiografia bidimensionale ed osservazioni sulla genesi dell’ostruzione [Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Distribution of the hypertrophy evaluated by bidimensional echocardiography and observations on the genesis of the obstruction] Italian. G. Ital. Cardiol. 1984, 14, 418–423. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  25. Liu, Y.L.; Xiong, J.R. (Eds.) Clinical Echocardiography, 3rd ed.; Science Press: Beijing, China, 2014. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  26. Xu, J.; Wen, J.; Shu, L.; Liu, C.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, W. Mechanism and correlated factors of SAM phenomenon after aortic valve replacement. J. Huazhong Univ. Sci. Technol. Med. Sci. 2007, 27, 72–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Chaddad, R.; Hakim, M.; Carreira, V.; Khater, J. Reversible Systolic Anterior Motion in the Absence of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Following Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Report of a Rare Case. Cureus 2026, 18, e102450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Ibrahim, M.; Rao, C.; Ashrafian, H.; Chaudhry, U.; Darzi, A.; Athanasiou, T. Modern management of systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2012, 41, 1260–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Raffa, G.M.; Romano, G.; Falletta, C.; Morsolini, M.; Turrisi, M.; Gentile, G.; Nugara, C.; Scarlata, M.; Clemenza, F.; Pilato, M. Trattamento chirurgico della cardiomiopatia ipertrofica ostruttiva: Il ruolo della valvola mitrale [Surgical management of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: The role of mitral valve]. G. Ital. Cardiol. 2019, 20, 109–116. (In Italian) [Google Scholar]
  30. Shuvy, M.; Postell, Y.Y.; Carasso, S.; Marmor, D.; Strauss, B.H.; Maisano, F.; Lapenna, E. Mitral Valve Interventions for Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy. Can. J. Cardiol. 2024, 40, 860–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Rosoff, M.; Cohen, M.V.; Grose, R.; Greenberg, M.A. Clinical and hemodynamic correlation in patients with pericardial effusion and swinging heart by echocardiography. J. Clin. Ultrasound 1983, 11, 477–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Seitz, A.; Ong, P.; Backes, M.; Mahrholdt, H. Chronic pericardial effusion in the setting of pericardial capillary haemangioma: A case report and review of the literature. Eur. Heart J. Case Rep. 2018, 2, yty024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Azria, E.; Dufeu, M.; Fernandez, P.; Walker, F.; Luton, D. Cervical adenocarcinoma presenting as a cardiac tamponade in a 57-year-old woman: A case report. J. Med. Case Rep. 2011, 5, 594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Iyer, V.H.; Sharma, D.M.; Charki, S.; Mohanty, P.K. Cardiac tamponade in a neonate: A dreadful condition--need for functional echo. BMJ Case Rep. 2014, 2014, bcr2014207040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Salem, B.I.; Kupor, L.; DePuey, G.; Benrey, J. Echocardiographic swinging heart motion in loculated anterior pericardial effusion. South Med. J. 1979, 72, 999–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Corsini, I.; Leardini, D.; Carfagnini, F.; Pession, A.; Lanari, M. Massive Pericardial Effusion in a 14-Year-Old Girl with Mild Fatigue and Neck Pain. Pediatr. Rep. 2022, 14, 8–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Krueger, S.K.; Zucker, R.P.; Dzindzio, B.S.; Forker, A.D. Swinging heart syndrome with predominant anterior pericardial effusion. J. Clin. Ultrasound 1976, 4, 113–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. El Kaissi, J.; El Younoussi, N. Cardiac Tamponade Due to Purulent Pericarditis in an Immunocompetent Patient. Cureus 2025, 17, e98127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Summary of classic echocardiographic signs.
Table 1. Summary of classic echocardiographic signs.
Sign Naming Logic Definition Clinical Implications
McConnell’s Sign Named after its original describer, McConnell et al., in 1996. Segmental right ventricular wall motion abnormality with apical sparing. Highly specific for acute pulmonary embolism; can be demonstrated at the bedside and may guide therapeutic intervention.
The D-Sign Named for its resemblance to the letter “D”. The left ventricle assumes the shape of the letter “D” instead of its normal circular appearance. Marker of right ventricular pressure overload; can be seen in acute right ventricular failure, RV dilatation, pulmonary embolism, or chronic pulmonary hypertension.
The 60:60 Sign Named for the two numerical cutoff values it comprises: 60 ms and 60 mmHg. Combination of pulmonary acceleration time < 60 ms and tricuspid regurgitation jet gradient < 60 mmHg. Highly specific for pulmonary embolism; can confirm the diagnosis when present but cannot exclude it due to low sensitivity; independent predictor of 30-day mortality.
The SAM Sign An abbreviation for “systolic anterior motion”. Abnormal movement of the anterior mitral valve leaflet toward the interventricular septum during systole, causing left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. Key diagnostic evidence for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; also observed after aortic valve replacement and in acute myocardial infarction.
The Swinging Heart Sign Named for the descriptive appearance of the heart swinging within a large pericardial effusion. Right ventricular anterior wall, interventricular septum, and left ventricular posterior wall all move in the same direction throughout the cardiac cycle; identification of specific valvular or other intracardiac structures is often difficult. Reliable marker of cardiac tamponade in the setting of a large pericardial effusion, except in patients with intrapericardial lesions that mechanically limit cardiac motion.
Table 2. Summary of novel echocardiographic signs.
Table 2. Summary of novel echocardiographic signs.
Sign Naming Logic Definition Clinical Implications
The Three Pipes Sign Named for its descriptive appearance, as the three major branches of the aortic arch resemble three pipes. In the suprasternal long-axis view of the aortic arch, the brachiocephalic trunk, left common carotid artery, and left subclavian artery may be visualized arising from the aortic arch, appearing as three parallel or slightly diverging tubular structures resembling three pipes. May aid in recognition of the suprasternal long-axis view of the aortic arch when the three branches are adequately displayed. Provides an anatomical framework for the localization and measurement of coarctation of the descending aorta. May also serve as an aid in scanning quality control.
The LTS Sign An abbreviation for the “Large-Thin-Small” triad. The echocardiographic appearance of dilated cardiomyopathy is characterized by three features: large ventricular cavity, thin interventricular septum, and small mitral valve orifice, the initials of which yield the “Large-Thin-Small” triad: LTS. Provides a simple mnemonic, Large, Thin, Small, that may help echocardiographers, particularly trainees, recognize the typical echocardiographic features of dilated cardiomyopathy.
The LTI Sign An abbreviation for the “Large-Thick-Impaired” triad. The echocardiographic appearance of endocardial fibroelastosis is characterized by three features: large ventricular cavity, thick endocardium, and impaired ventricular function, the initials of which yield the “Large-Thick-Impaired” triad: LTI. Provides a simple mnemonic, Large, Thick, Impaired, that may assist echocardiographers, especially trainees, in recognizing the characteristic echocardiographic features of endocardial fibroelastosis.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.