Submitted:
23 July 2026
Posted:
29 July 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Chemical Reagents and Compounds
2.2. Animal Housing and Ethical Declaration
2.3. In Vitro Cell Culture and Selective Cytotoxic Evaluation
2.4. Humoral Immune Response Assay (Modified Jerne/Cunningham Plaque Technique)
2.5. Complementary In Vivo and In Vitro Assays
2.5.1. TPA-Induced Mouse Ear Edema (Acute Inflammation Model)
2.5.3. In Vitro Antioxidant Activity Assays
DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity
2.5.3. Micronucleus Inhibition Test (Antimutagenicity Assay)
2.5.4. Peripheral Blood Lymphocyte Quantification
2.6. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Sex-Specific Effects on the Humoral Immune Response
3.2. In Vitro Selective Cytotoxicity and Antitumoral Mechanisms
3.3. Comparative Selectivity Index
3.4. Influence of Immunization Kinetics on the Humoral Immune Response
3.5. Acute Topical Anti-Inflammatory Activity in the TPA-Induced Mouse Ear Edema Model
3.6. In Vitro Free Radical Scavenging Efficiency (DPPH Assay)
3.7. Evaluation of In Vivo Genotoxicity and Antimutagenic Potential of BS and PT
3.8. Induction of Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes by Beta-Sitosterol (BS)
3. Discussions
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Acknowledgments
Abbreviations
| Abbreviation | Full Name / Meaning |
| AFC | Antibody-Forming Cells (Células Formadoras de Anticuerpos) |
| ANOVA | Analysis of Variance |
| ATCC | American Type Culture Collection |
| BS | β-Sitosterol |
| CO₂ | Carbon Dioxide |
| CT₀ | Non-cytotoxic (Citotoxicidad cero) |
| CT₁₀₀ | 100% Cytotoxic (Citotoxicidad total) |
| DPPH | 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl |
| FBS | Fetal Bovine Serum |
| HepG2 | Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cell Line |
| IgM | Immunoglobulin M |
| MEM | Minimum Essential Medium |
| MN | Micronucleus (Micronúcleos) |
| MNPCE | Micronucleated Polychromatic Erythrocytes |
| ND | Not Detected (No detectado) |
| NF-κB | Nuclear Factor Kappa B |
| PFC | Plaque-Forming Cells (Células Formadoras de Placas) |
| PT | Pteropodine |
| ROS | Reactive Oxygen Species |
| SD | Standard Deviation |
| SEM | Error of the Mean |
| SI | Selectivity Index |
| SRBC | Sheep Red Blood Cells (Glóbulos rojos de carnero) |
| 5-FU | 5-Fluorouracil |
References
- Halliwell, B.; Gutteridge, J.M. Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine, 5th ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2015; pp. 10–55. [Google Scholar]
- Brand-Williams, W.; Cuvelier, M.E.; Berset, C. Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 1995, 28, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Young, L.M.; Kheifets, J.M.; Ballaron, S.A.; Young, J.M. Edema and increased vascular permeability induced by 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) in the mouse ear. Agents Actions 1981, 11, 252–258. [Google Scholar]
- Bouic, P.J. The role of phytosterols and phytosterolins in immune modulation: a review of the past 10 years. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2001, 4, 471–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Awad, A.B.; Fink, C.S. Phytosterols as anticancer dietary components: evidence and mechanism of action. J. Nutr. 2000, 130, 2127–2130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bao, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Xia, L. Molecular Mechanism of $\beta$-Sitosterol and its Derivatives in Tumor Progression. Front. Oncol. 2022, 12, 926975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ezhilarasan, D.; Ditty, M.J. $\beta$-sitosterol induces reactive oxygen species-mediated apoptosis in human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line. Avicenna J. Phytomed. 2021, 11, 541–550. [Google Scholar]
- Sheng, Y.; Bryngelsson, C.; Pero, R.W. An active ingredient of Uncaria tomentosa de-carboxyalkylating agent, stimulates lymphocyte proliferation and enhances DNA repair. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2000, 69, 115–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Aguilar, J.L.; Rojas, P.; Marcelo, A.; Plaza, A.; Bauer, R.; Reininger, E.; Klaas, C.A.; Merfort, I. Anti-inflammatory activity of Uncaria tomentosa (Cama de carnero) extracts in the microvascular system. Phytomedicine 2002, 9, 23–37. [Google Scholar]
- Vo, T.K.; Nguyen, I.T.; Nguyen, H.D.; Vo, Q.H.; Doan, C.C. Anti-Hepatocellular-Cancer Activity Exerted by $\beta$-Sitosterol and $\beta$-Sitosterol-Glucoside from Indigofera zollingeriana Miq. Molecules 2020, 25*, 3021. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Aden, D.P.; Fogel, A.; Plotkin, S.; Damjanov, I.; Knowles, B.B. Characterization of a major human hepatoma-derived cell line. Nature 1979, 282, 615–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jerne, N.K.; Nordin, A.A. Plaque formation in agar by single antibody-producing cells. Science 1963, 140, 405–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cunningham, A.J.; Szenberg, A. Further improvements in the plaque technique for detecting single antibody-forming cells. Immunology 1968, 14, 599–601. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Schmid, W. The micronucleus test. Mutat. Res. Mutagen. Relat. Subj. 1975, 31, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Review on Phytochemicals. Uncaria tomentosa as a Promising Natural Source of Molecules with Multiple Activities: Review of Its Phytochemistry and Pharmacology. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 1420. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- BenchChem Technical Consortium. An In-depth Technical Guide to the Mechanism of Action of Pteropodine. Mol. Pharmacol. Guid. 2025, 14, 89–104. [Google Scholar]
- Paniagua-Pérez, R.; Madrigal-Bujaidar, E.; Reyes-Legorreta, C.; Canseco-Martínez, C.; Flores-Mondragón, G. Anti-Inflammatory Potential of Pteropodine in Rodents. Biomed. Pharmacol. Rep. 2024, 8, 112–125. [Google Scholar]
| Antigen / Treatment | Dose (mg/kg) | Female Mice (Mean ± SD) | Variation vs. Pos. Control (%) | Male Mice (Mean ± SD) | Variation vs. Pos. Control (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mineral Oil (Negative Control) | — | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| 10% Sheep Red Blood Cells (SRBC) (Positive Control) | — | 287±4.7 | — | 287±4.7 | — |
| BS | 100 | 398±3.9* | +38.7% | 140±6.4* | -51.2% |
| BS | 200 | 507±6.0* | +76.7% | 175±8.0* | -39.0% |
| BS | 300 | 568±11.0* | +98.9% | 227±7.0* | -21.4% |
| Antigen / Treatment | Dose mg/kg) | Female Mice (Mean ± SD) | Variation vs. Pos. Control (%) | Male Mice (Mean ± SD) | Variation vs. Pos. Control (%) |
| Mineral Oil (Negative Control) | — | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| 10% Sheep Red Blood Cells (SRBC) (Positive Control) | — | 227±4.7 | — | 227±4.7 | — |
| PT | 25 | 320±3.9* | +41.7% | 96±6.4* | -58.2% |
| PT | 50 | 408±6.0* | +80.7% | 132±8.0* | -42.0% |
| PT | 100 | 463±11.0* | +104.9% | 168±7.0* | -25.9% |
| Cell Lin | PT Concentration (μg/mL) and Incubation Time (Hours) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 µg/mL | 10 µg/mL | 25 µg/mL | |||||||
| 24 h | 48 h | 72 h | 24 h | 48 h | 72 h | 24 h | 48 h | 72 h | |
| Chang liver | 11% | 16% | 13% | 15% | 19% | 17% | 14% | 14% | 16% |
| HepG2 | 8% | 13% | 15% | 11% | 18% | 22% | 19% | 18% | 20% |
| Cell Line | BS Concentration (μg/mL) and Incubation Time (Hours) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 µg/mL | 200 µg/mL | 300 µg/mL | |||||||
| 12 h | 24 h | 48 h | 12 h | 24 h | 48 h | 12 h | 24 h | 48 h | |
| Chang liver | 7% | 13% | 18% | 11% | 18% | 22% | 15% | 18% | 20% |
| HepG2 | ND | 20% | ND | 32% | ND | 30% | ND | 28% | ND |
| Antigen / Treatment | Immunization Schedule (Relative to PT Administration) | PFC / 106 Lymphocytes (Mean ± SD) | Variation vs. Positive Control (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| saline solution | Negative Control | 0 | — |
| 10% Sheep Red Blood Cells (SRBC) | Positive Control (24 h prior) | 186±9.2 | — |
| Positive Control (Simultaneous) | 210±8.6 | — | |
| Positive Control (24 h post) | 198±11.6 | — | |
| PT 25 mg/kg | 24 h prior | 277±6 | +49%* |
| Simultaneous | 321±4.2 | +53%* | |
| 24 h post | 147±7.9 | +26%* | |
| PT 50 mg/kg | 24 h prior | 314±8.9 | +69%* |
| Simultaneous | 468±10 | +123%* | |
| 24 h post | 109±13 | +45%* | |
| PT 100 mg/kg | 24 h prior | 405±12 | +118%* |
| Simultaneous | 462±11 | +120%* | |
| 24 h post | 93±8.2 | -53%* |
| Antigen / Treatment | Immunization Schedule (Relative to BS Administration) | PFC / 106 Lymphocytes (Mean ± SD) |
Variation vs. Positive Control (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mineral Oil | Negative Control | 0 | — |
| 10% SRBC | Positive Control (24 h prior) | 136±7.2 | — |
| Positive Control (Simultaneous) | 110±5.6 | — | |
| Positive Control (24 h post) | 194±10.6 | — | |
| BS 100 mg/kg | 24 h prior | 189±5.3* | +39% |
| Simultaneous | 158±8.2* | +43% | |
| 24 h post | 153±14.0* | +21% | |
| BS 200 mg/kg | 24 h prior | 239±9.1* | +76% |
| Simultaneous | 221±4.6* | +101% | |
| 24 h post | 118±6.6* | +39% | |
| BS 300 mg/kg | 24 h prior | 269± 6.3* | +98% |
| Simultaneous | 257±11.0* | +133% | |
| 24 h post | 95±13.2* | -51% |
| Experimental Groups | Compound | Dose (mg/ear) | Edema Weight (mg) (Mean ± SEM) | Edema Inhibition (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TPA Control | — | — | 19.7 ± 0.6 | 0.0 |
| Indomethacin | Reference NSAID | 0.5 | 5.8 ± 0.6* | 70.3 |
| BS-D1 | BS | 0.5 | 6.7 ± 0.6* | 66.0 |
| BS-D2 | BS | 1.0 | 5.4 ± 0.5* | 74.2 |
| BS-D3 | BS | 1.5 | 3.1 ± 0.3* | 84.1 |
| PT-D1 | Pt | 0.25 | 5.7 ± 0.6* | 66.0 |
| PT-D2 | Pt | 0.50 | 6.1 ± 0.3* | 74.2 |
| PT-D3 | Pt | 1.0 | 6.4 ± 0.5* | 84.1 |
| Concentration (μg/mL) | Compound | Compound Inhibition (%) (Mean ± SEM) |
Ascorbic Acid Standard (%) (Mean ± SEM) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25 | PT | 57.64 ± 0.78 | 38.77 ± 1.29 |
| 50 | PT | 79.82 ± 1.26 | 68.22 ± 1.80 |
| 75 | PT | 98.29 ± 1.24 | 88.75 ± 1.23 |
| 100 | BS | 93.14 ± 1.20 | 99.19 ± 1.42 |
| 125 | BS | 137.13 ± 1.11 | 119.57 ± 1.31 |
| 150 | BS | 156.22 ± 1.58 | 128.86 ± 1.13 |
| Agent / Treatment | Dose (mg/kg) | 24 h (Mean ± SD) |
48 h (Mean ± SD) |
72 h (Mean ± SD) |
96 h (Mean ± SD) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MO | — | 1.60 ± 0.26 | 2.05 ± 0.18 | 1.74 ± 0.21 | 1.10 ± 0.32 |
| BS | 200 | 1.13 ± 0.15 | 0.83 ± 0.31 | 0.83 ± 0.15 | 1.00 ± 0.42 |
| BS | 400 | 1.33 ± 0.21 | 1.03 ± 0.33 | 1.00 ± 0.43 | 1.33 ± 0.32 |
| BS | 600 | 1.40 ± 0.19 | 1.53 ± 0.18 | 1.20 ± 0.23 | 1.00 ± 0.17 |
| BS | 1000 | 1.70 ± 0.17 | 1.30 ± 0.24 | 1.40 ± 0.24 | 1.00 ± 0.26 |
| DR | 10 | 18.26 ± 0.26* | 19.30 ± 0.29* | 25.40 ± 0.31* | 20.50 ± 0.22* |
| DW | — | 1.40 ± 0.31 | 1.35 ± 0.46 | 1.30 ± 0.33 | 1.45 ± 0.17 |
| PT | 100 | 1.30 ± 0.44 | 1.40 ± 0.31 | 1.50 ± 0.25 | 1.50 ± 0.27 |
| PT | 200 | 1.40 ± 0.26 | 1.50 ± 0.16 | 1.60 ± 0.13 | 1.61 ± 0.51 |
| PT | 300 | 1.40 ± 0.39 | 1.55 ± 0.51 | 1.70 ± 0.41 | 1.71 ± 0.28 |
| PT | 600 | 1.50 ± 0.19 | 1.64 ± 0.31 | 1.60 ± 0.32 | 1.65 ± 0.36 |
| DR | 10 | 19.15 ± 0.30* | 21.72 ± 0.17* | 24.30 ± 0.34* | 22.82 ± 0.17* |
| Agent/Treatment | Dose | 24 h (Mean ± SEM) | 48 h (Mean ± SEM) | 72 h (Mean ± SEM) | 96 h (Mean ± SEM) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MO | — | 49.50 ± 0.10 | 48.30 ± 0.21## | 46.16 ± 0.14## | 51.40 ± 0.02## |
| IF | 0.01 μL/kg | 50.30 ± 0.26* | 56.10 ± 0.22* | 60.60 ± 0.22* | 56.00 ± 0.11* |
| BS | 200 mg/kg | 54.50 ± 0.22*,## | 60.10 ± 0.08*,## | 64.50 ± 0.09*,## | 61.80 ± 0.12*,## |
| BS | 400 mg/kg | 56.80 ± 0.20*,## | 60.30 ± 0.24*,## | 58.80 ± 0.24* | 60.40 ± 0.26*,## |
| BS | 600 mg/kg | 58.10 ± 0.06*,## | 59.60 ± 0.21*,## | 58.30 ± 0.22* | 60.70 ± 0.03*,## |
| BS | 1000 mg/kg | 60.40 ± 0.15*,## | 61.10 ± 0.16*,## | 61.50 ± 0.24* | 62.80 ± 0.08*,## |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).