Submitted:
17 July 2026
Posted:
20 July 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design
2.2. Context
2.3. Data Sources and Measurement
2.4. Participants
2.5. Bias Control
2.6. Variables
2.7. Serological Test
2.8. Sample Size
2.9. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| Abbreviation | Description |
| BHU | Basic Health Units |
| CI 95% | 95% Confidence Interval |
| IgG | Immunoglobulin G |
| IgM | Immunoglobulin M |
| OR | Odds Ratio |
| SD | Standard Deviation |
| SI | International System of Units |
| T. gondii | Toxoplasma gondii |
References
- Sousa, S.B.C.; Mangueira, C.D.M.; Moron, S.E.; Ferreira, R.G.; Gomes, H.; Costa, N.M.E.P.L.; Cangussu, A.S.R.; Ribeiro, B.M.; Campos, F.S.; Santos, G.R.D.; et al. Prevalence and Risk Factors for Congenital Toxoplasmosis in Newborns in the Public Health System in the Eastern Region of the Brazilian Amazon, Northern Tocantins State, Brazil: Retrospective Cohort Study. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2026, 11, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- De-Paschale, M.; et al. Antenatal screening for Toxoplasma gondii, Cytomegalovirus, rubella and Treponema pallidum infections in northern Benin. Trop. Med. Int. Health 2014, 19, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yadav, R.K.; Maity, S.; Saha, S. A review on TORCH: groups of congenital infection during pregnancy. J. Sci. Innov. Res. 2014, 3, 258–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manicklal, S.; et al. The "silent" global burden of congenital cytomegalovirus. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2013, 26, 86–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Padmavathy, M.; et al. Seroprevalence of STORCH infections and adverse reproductive outcome in current pregnancy with bad obstetric history. J. Clin. Biomed. Sci. 2013, 3, 62–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thiébaut, R.; et al. Effectiveness of prenatal treatment for congenital toxoplasmosis: a meta-analysis of individual patients' data. Lancet 2007, 369, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Holler, S.R.; dos Passos, C.; Ribeiro, A.L.; Küster, S.Z.; Silvestre, E.A.; Martins, D.R.; Teixeira, A.C.M.; Antunes, M.T.Z.; Bischoff, A.R.; Carvalho, C.G. Incidence of congenital toxoplasmosis among live births in a tertiary center in Southern Brazil. J. Trop. Pediatr. 2026, 72, fmag037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kawasaki, M.L.; Carvalho, P.N.; Lucarevschi, B.R. Atenção à toxoplasmose durante a gestação em população carente do interior do Estado de São Paulo. Pediatria (São Paulo) 2006, 28, 242–250. [Google Scholar]
- D'Ambros, D.; Santos, L.H.S.; dos Santos, L.S.; Ferreira, M.; Andrade, C.; Guttmann, P.; Frota, A.C.; Abreu, T.; Machado, E.; Hofer, C.B. Maternal and clinical predictors of congenital toxoplasmosis: a prospective cohort study in Brazil. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 2026, 00, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Avelino, M. A gestação como fator de risco para a primo-infecção pelo Toxoplasma gondii. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Brazil, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Salari, N.; Rahimi, A.; Zarei, H.; et al. Global seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2025, 25, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Carellos, E.V.M.; et al. Adverse socioeconomic conditions and oocyst-related factors are associated with congenital toxoplasmosis in a population-based study in Minas Gerais, Brazil. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e88588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Avelino, M.M.; et al. Congenital toxoplasmosis and prenatal care state programs. BMC Infect. Dis. 2014, 14, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nguyen, T.G.; Garnaud, C.; Brenier-Pinchart, M.P.; Robert, M. Diagnosis and treatment of congenital toxoplasmosis: an updated overview. Expert Rev. Anti Infect. Ther. 2026, 24, 501–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hatanaka, A.R.; Braga, A.; Traina, E.; Teixeira, L.K.A.; Longo, C.; Castro, P.T.; Werner, H.; Callado, G.Y.; Araujo Júnior, E. Gestational and congenital toxoplasmosis: an updated review with emphasis on high-prevalence countries. Women 2026, 6, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malta, M.; Cardoso, L.O.; Bastos, F.I.; Magnanini, M.M.F.; da Silva, C.M.F.P. STROBE initiative: guidelines on reporting observational studies. Rev. Saude Publica 2010, 44, 559–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Conselho Nacional de Saúde. Resolução nº 196, de 10 de outubro de 1996; Diretrizes e normas regulamentadoras de pesquisas envolvendo seres humanos. Brasília, 1996.
- Dias, R.C.F.; Lopes-Mori, F.M.R.; Mitsuka-Breganó, R.; Dias, R.A.F.; Tokano, D.V.; Reiche, E.M.V.; et al. Factors associated to infection by Toxoplasma gondii in pregnant women attended in basic health units in the city of Rolândia, Paraná, Brazil. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. São Paulo 2011, 53, 185–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Porto, A.M.F.; Amorim, M.M.R.; Coelho, I.C.N.; Santos, L.C. Serologic profile of toxoplasmosis in pregnant women attended at a teaching-hospital in Recife. Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. 2008, 54, 242–248. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Moura, F.L.; Amendoeira, M.R.R.; Bastos, O.M.P.; Mattos, D.P.B.G.; Fonseca, A.B.M.; Nicolau, J.L.; et al. Prevalence and risk factors for Toxoplasma gondii infection among pregnant and postpartum women attended at public healthcare facilities in the City of Niterói, State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2013, 46, 200–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bittencourt, L.H.F.D.B.; Lopes-Mori, F.M.R.; Mitsuka-Breganó, R.; Valentim-Zabott, M.; Freire, R.L.; Pinto, S.B.; et al. Soroepidemiologia da toxoplasmose em gestantes a partir da implantação do Programa de Vigilância da Toxoplasmose Adquirida e Congênita em municípios da região oeste do Paraná. Rev. Bras. Ginecol. Obstet. 2012, 34, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Avelino, M.; Campos-Júnior, D.; Parada, J.; Castro, A. Risk factors for Toxoplasma gondii infection in women of childbearing age. Braz. J. Infect. Dis. 2005, 8, 164–174. [Google Scholar]
- Azevedo, A.P.; de Lima, H.A.A.; da Silva, A.R.R. Características epidemiológicas da toxoplasmose gestacional no Amazonas. Braz. J. Implantol. Health Sci. 2024, 6, 268–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silva, M.G.; Câmara, J.T.; Vinaud, M.C.; Castro, A.M. Epidemiological factors associated with seropositivity for toxoplasmosis in pregnant women from Gurupi, State of Tocantins, Brazil. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2014, 47, 469–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Co-infections and risk factors of Toxoplasma gondii infection among pregnant women in Ghana: a facility-based cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE 2025, 20, e0324950. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Toxoplasmosis knowledge and preventive behaviours among pregnant women in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study. Healthcare 2025, 13, 174. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Varella, I.; Wagner, M.; Darela, A.; Nunes, L.; Müller, R. Prevalência de soropositividade para toxoplasmose em gestantes. J. Pediatr. 2003, 79, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ertug, S.; Okyay, P.; Turkmen, M.; Yuksel, H. Seroprevalence and risk factors for Toxoplasma infection among pregnant women in Aydin province, Turkey. BMC Public Health 2005, 5, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Oliveira-Bahia, L.; Abreu, A.; Azevedo-Silva, J.; Oréfice, F. Toxoplasmosis in southeastern Brazil: an alarming situation of highly endemic acquired and congenital infection. Int. J. Parasitol. 2001, 31, 115–144. [Google Scholar]
- Aspinall, T.; Guy, E.; Roberts, K.; Joynson, D.; Hyde, J.; Sims, P. Molecular evidence for multiple Toxoplasma gondii infections in individual patients in England and Wales: public health implications. Int. J. Parasitol. 2003, 33, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Spalding, S.; Amendoeira, M.; Ribeiro, L.; Silveira, C.; Garcia, A.; Camilo-Coura, L. Estudo prospectivo de gestantes e seus bebês com risco de transmissão de toxoplasmose congênita em município do Rio Grande do Sul. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2003, 36, 483–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Leão, P.; Meirelles-Filho, J.; Medeiros, S. Toxoplasmose: soroprevalência em puérperas atendidas pelo Sistema Único de Saúde. Rev. Bras. Ginecol. Obstet. 2004, 26, 43–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gelaw, Y.M.; Dagnew, G.W.; Alene, G.D.; Gangneux, J.P.; Robert-Gangneux, F. Toxoplasma gondii seroprevalence among pregnant women in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Maternal, behavioral, and environmental factors associated with Toxoplasma gondii infection in pregnancy in Italy: a case–control study. Diagnostics 2026, 16, 606. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alvaro, R.; Gaucher, L.; Dupont, D.; Menotti, J.; Atallah, A.; de la Fournière, B.; Massoud, M.; Lina, B.; Tirard-Collet, P.; Wallon, M. Epidemiological changes in Toxoplasma infection: a 7-year longitudinal study in pregnant women in Lyon, France. 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Barbosa, I.R. Estudo epidemiológico da toxoplasmose em gestantes atendidas na Maternidade Escola Januário Cicco, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte. Master's Thesis, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Barbosa, I.; Holanda, C.; Andrade-Neto, V. Toxoplasmosis screening and risk factors amongst pregnant females in Natal, northeastern Brazil. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2009, 103, 377–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alford, C.; Stagno, S.; Reynolds, D. Congenital toxoplasmosis: clinical, laboratory and therapeutic considerations with special reference to subclinical disease. Bull. N. Y. Acad. Med. 1974, 50, 160–168. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Alves, J.M.; Magalhães, V.; Gomes, A. Avaliação oftalmológica em pacientes com AIDS e neurotoxoplasmose. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2010, 43, 36–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Early warning signs, effects, risk factors, and diagnostic indicators of toxoplasmosis in pregnant women in Africa: a scoping review. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2026, 11, 104. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Using dried blood spots to estimate Toxoplasma gondii seroprevalence in pregnant women in Catalonia, Spain, and to serologically diagnose congenital toxoplasmosis. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2026. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Perinatal outcomes in primary toxoplasmosis during pregnancy: treatment. J. Biochem. Technol. 2026, 17, 57–67. [CrossRef]


| IgM + Pregnant Women | IgM - Pregnant Women | OR | CI 95% | p Value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n. | % | n. | % | ||||
| ETHNICITY | |||||||
| mulatto + black | 45 | 85.54% | 778 | 78.03% | 1.81 | 0.02-9.90 | 0.830 |
| white | 7 | 13.46% | 219 | 21.97% | |||
| AGE | |||||||
| ≥30 | 35 | 67.31% | 485 | 48.64% | 2.17 | 1.60-7.12 | 0.014 |
| <30 | 17 | 32.70% | 512 | 51.36% | 1 | ||
| ORIGIN | |||||||
| Rural zone | 3 | 5.8% | 46 | 4.6% | 1.26 | 0.11-6.84 | 0.324 |
| Urban zone | 49 | 94.2% | 951 | 95.4% | 1 | ||
| NUMBER OF PREGNANCIES | |||||||
| Primigravid | 19 | 36.5% | 387 | 38.8% | 0.91 | 0.32-3.12 | 0.112 |
| Multigravid | 33 | 63.5% | 610 | 61.2% | |||
| OCCUPATION | |||||||
| Work | 47 | 90.4% | 526 | 52.8% | 8.42 | 1.05-22.12 | 0.032 |
| Not work | 5 | 9.6% | 471 | 47.2% | 1 | ||
| MONTHLY FAMILY INCOME | |||||||
| < 2 minimum wages | 22 | 42.31% | 493 | 49.4% | 0.74 | 0.42-5.12 | 0.980 |
| ≥ 2 minimum wages | 30 | 57.69% | 504 | 51.6% | 1 | ||
| LABOR | |||||||
| Cesarean section | 33 | 63.5% | 624 | 62.6% | 1.04 | 0.42-2.05 | 0.850 |
| Normal | 19 | 36.5% | 373 | 37.4% | 1 | ||
| PREVIOUS MISCARRIAGES | |||||||
| Yes | 13 | 25% | 200 | 20.1% | 1.33 | 0.47-3.73 | 0.590 |
| No | 39 | 75% | 797 | 79.9% | 1 | ||
| NUMBER OF MISCARRIAGES | |||||||
| 1 miscarriage | 8 | 60% | 156 | 78.0% | - | ||
| > 1 miscarriage | 5 | 40% | 44 | 22.0% | |||
| MARITAL STATE | |||||||
| Married (with partner) | 47 | 90.4% | 754 | 75.6% | 3.02 | 1.43-9.32 | 0.023 |
| Single (without partner) | 5 | 9.6% | 243 | 24.4% | |||
| SCHOOLING | |||||||
| < 8 years of schooling | 30 | 57.69% | 308 | 30.9% | 3.04 | 1.24-11.56 | 0.030 |
| ≥ 8 years of schooling | 22 | 42.31% | 687 | 69.1% | 1 | ||
| NUMBER OF CONSULTATIONS | |||||||
| ≥ 6 | 30 | 57.69% | 472 | 52.7% | 1.52 | 0.10-2.27 | 0.444 |
| < 6 | 22 | 42.31% | 525 | 47.3% | 1 | ||
| IgM + pregnant women | IgM - pregnant women | OR | CI 95% | p value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n. | % | n. | % | ||||
| COMPLAINTS | |||||||
| With complaints | 43 | 82.7% | 836 | 83.8% | 0.92 | 0.44-1.93 | 0.834 |
| No complaints | 9 | 17.3% | 161 | 16.2% | 1 | ||
| HYPERTENSION | |||||||
| Yes | 11 | 21.1% | 153 | 15.3% | 1.48 | 0.71-2.99 | 0.302 |
| No | 41 | 78.9% | 844 | 84.7% | 1 | ||
| CEPHALALGIA | |||||||
| Yes | 20 | 38.5% | 381 | 38.2% | 1.01 | 0.56-2.75 | 0.961 |
| No | 32 | 61.5% | 616 | 61.8% | 1 | ||
| PAIN IN THE LOWER BELLY | |||||||
| Yes | 17 | 32.7% | 356 | 35.7% | 0.87 | 0.63-2.07 | 0.668 |
| No | 35 | 67.3% | 641 | 64.3% | 1 | ||
| LEUCORRHEA | |||||||
| Yes | 11 | 21.2% | 189 | 19.0% | 1.14 | 0.44-1.74 | 0.700 |
| No | 41 | 78.8% | 808 | 81.0% | 1 | ||
| LOWER BACK PAIN | |||||||
| Yes | 14 | 26.9% | 164 | 16.4% | 1.87 | 0.28-4.00 | 0.046 |
| No | 38 | 73.1% | 833 | 83.6% | 1 | ||
| EDEMA* | |||||||
| Yes | 7 | 13.5% | 138 | 13.8% | 0.96 | 0.45-2.32 | 0.957 |
| No | 45 | 86.5% | 859 | 86.2% | 1 | ||
| NAUSEA | |||||||
| Yes | 6 | 11.5% | 124 | 12.4% | 0.91 | 0.46-2.61 | 0.856 |
| No | 46 | 88.5% | 873 | 87.6% | 1 | ||
| VAGINAL BLEEDING | |||||||
| Yes | 3 | 5.8% | 92 | 9.2% | 0.60 | 0.51-5.42 | 0.407 |
| No | 49 | 94.2% | 905 | 90.8% | 1 | ||
| VERTIGO | |||||||
| Yes | 3 | 5.8% | 78 | 7.8% | 0.72 | 0.42-4.53 | 0.598 |
| No | 49 | 94.2% | 919 | 92.2% | 1 | ||
| HEARTBURN | |||||||
| Yes | 3 | 5.8% | 74 | 7.4% | 0.76 | 0.40-4.28 | 0.669 |
| No | 49 | 94.2% | 923 | 92.6% | 1 | ||
| INSOMNIA | |||||||
| Yes | 2 | 3.8% | 44 | 4.4% | 0.86 | 0.27-4.83 | 0.860 |
| No | 50 | 96.2% | 953 | 95.6% | 1 | ||
| URINARY INFECTION | |||||||
| Yes | 5 | 9.6% | 107 | 10.7% | 0.88 | 0.44-2.90 | 0.800 |
| No | 47 | 90.4% | 890 | 89.3% | 1 | ||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).