Submitted:
03 July 2026
Posted:
06 July 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Data
| Satellite | Years | Bands |
| Landsat 5 TM | 1994, 1996, 1998, 2000, 2004, 2006, 2008, 2010 | B1 – Blue B2 – Green B3 – Red B4 – Near Infrared (NIR) B5 – SWIR1 B6 – Thermal Infrared B7 – SWIR2 |
| Landsat 7 ETM+ | 2002, 2008, 2012 | |
| Landsat 8 OLI | 2014, 2016, 2018, 2020 | B1 – Coastal aerosol B2 – Blue B3 – Green B4 – Red B5 – NIR B6 – SWIR1 B7 – SWIR2 B10 – Thermal Infrared |
| Landsat 9 OLI-2 | 2022, 2024 |
2.3. Vegetation Indices
2.4. Research Methods
2.5. Biomass and Carbon Losses Caused by Fire in Restored Ecosystems
3. Results
3.1. Evaluation of Accuracy and Feature Importance
3.2. Land Area Changes by Categories
3.3. Dune Stabilization Results
3.4. Dynamics of the Urban and Agriculture
3.5. Post-Fire Carbon and Biomass Loss
4. Discussion
4.1. Assessment of Coastal Forest Ecosystem Restoration
4.2. Assessment of Biomass Production in Stone Pine (Pinus Pinea) Coastal Dunes in Tunisia
4.3. Fire Effects on Carbon Losses
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Jackson, D.W.T.; Costas, S.; González-Villanueva, R.; Cooper, A. A Global ‘Greening’ of Coastal Dunes: An Integrated Consequence of Climate Change? Glob. Planet. Chang. 2019, 182, 103026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Della Bella, A.; Del Vecchio, S.; Fantinato, E.; Buffa, G. Coastal Dune Restoration: A Checklist Approach to Site Selection. Land 2024, 13, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- UNCED Agenda 21—Chapter 17: Protection of the Oceans, All Kinds of Seas, Including Enclosed and Semi-Enclosed Seas, and Coastal Areas and the Protection, Rational Use and Development of Their Living Resources. In United Nations Division for Sustainable Development; New York, NY, USA, 1992.
- Pinna, M.S.; Cogoni, D.; Bacchetta, G. Assessing the Potential for Restoring Mediterranean Coastal Dunes under Pressure from Tourism. J. Coast. Conserv 2022, 26, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Curr, R.H.F.; Koh, A.; Edwards, E.; Williams, A.T.; Daves, P. Assessing Anthropogenic Impact on Mediterranean Sand Dunes from Aerial Digital Photography. J. Coast. Conserv 2000, 6, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sedrati, M.; Dalour, L.; Bulot, G.; Metge, N. Nature-Based Solutions for Coastal Dune Restoration: The Case Study of AlgoBox in South Brittany, France. Ecol. Eng. 2025, 210, 107440. [Google Scholar]
- Jay, K.R.; Hacker, S.D.; Hagen, C.J. Quantifying the Relative Importance of Sand Deposition and Dune Grasses to Carbon Storage in US Central Atlantic Coast Dunes. Estuaries Coasts 2025, 48, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nordstrom, K.F. Beach and Dune Restoration; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Ferreira, Ó. The Effectiveness of Elevated Boardwalks in Restoring Coastal Dunes. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 345, 118759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gallego-Fernández, J.B.; Sánchez, I.A.; Ley, C. Restoration of Isolated and Small Coastal Sand Dunes on the Rocky Coast of Northern Spain. Ecol. Eng. 2011, 37, 1822–1832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Calafat, A.; Vírseda, S.; Lovera, R.; Lucena, J.R.; Bladé, C.; Rivero, L.; Ninot, J.M. Assessment of the Restoration of the Remolar Dune System (Viladecans, Barcelona): The Resilience of a Coastal Dune System. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2021, 9, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burke, A.; Newton, R.; Boyce, D.; Kolberg, H.; Brunner, I. Reestablishing a Keystone Species in an Arid Coastal Environment: Saltbush (Salsola Nollothensis) in Namibia. Ecol. Restor. 2011, 29, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lithgow, D.; Martínez, M.L.; Gallego-Fernández, J.B.; Hesp, P.A.; Flores, P.; Gachuz, S.; Rodríguez-Revelo, N.; Jiménez-Orocio, O.; Mendoza-González, G.; Álvarez-Molina, L.L. Linking Restoration Ecology with Coastal Dune Restoration. Geomorphology 2013, 199, 214–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van der Meulen, F.; Salman, A. Management of Mediterranean Coastal Dunes. Ocean Coast. Manag. 1996, 30, 177–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanjaume, E.; Pardo, J.E. Degradación de Sistemas Dunares. Las Dunas En. España 2011, 24, 439–460. [Google Scholar]
- Morales, J.A. The Spanish Coastal System. Dynamic Processes, Sediments and Management; J.A., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: Morales, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Montoni, M.V.F.; Honaine, M.F.; Del Río, J.L. An Assessment of Spontaneous Vegetation Recovery in Aggregate Quarries in Coastal Sand Dunes in Buenos Aires Province, Argentina. Environ. Manag. 2014, 54, 180–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martínez, M.L.; Hesp, P.A.; Gallego-Fernández, J.B. Coastal Dunes: Human Impact and Need for Restoration. Environ. Probl. Solving 2013, 1, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garcia-Lozano, C.; Pintó, J.; Daunis-i-Estadella, P. Changes in Coastal Dune Systems on the Catalan Shoreline (Spain, NW Mediterranean Sea): Comparing Dune Landscapes between 1890 and 1960 with Their Current Status. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2018, 208, 235–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- You, S.; Kim, M.; Lee, J.; Chon, J. Coastal Landscape Planning for Improving the Value of Ecosystem Services in Coastal Areas: Using System Dynamics Model. Env. Pollut. 2018, 242, 2040–2050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gómez-Pina, G.; Muñoz-Pérez, J.J.; Ramírez, J.L.; Ley, C. Sand Dune Management Problems and Techniques, Spain. J. Coast. Res. 2002, 36, 325–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hardisty, J. Beach and Nearshore Sediment Transport. In Sediment Transport and Depositional Processes; Pye, K., Ed.; Blackwell: London, UK, 1994; pp. 216–255. [Google Scholar]
- Barbier, E.B.; Hacker, S.D.; Kennedy, C.; Koch, E.W.; Stier, A.C. The Value of Estuarine and Coastal Ecosystem Services. Ecol. Monogr. 2011, 81, 169–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Everard, M.; Jones, L.; Watts, B. Have We Neglected the Societal Importance of Sand Dunes? - An Ecosystem Services Perspective. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 2010, 20, 476–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martínez, M.L.; Gallego-Fernández, J.B.; Hesp, P.A. Restoration of Coastal Dunes; Springer-Verlag: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Doing, H. Coastal Fore-Dune Zonation and Succession in Various Parts of the World. Vegetatio 1985, 61, 65–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feola, S.; Carranza, M.L.; Schaminée, J.H.J.; Janssen, J.A.M.; Acosta, A.T.R. EU Habitats of Interest: An Insight into Atlantic and Mediterranean Beach and Foredunes. Biodivers. Conserv 2011, 20, 1457–1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnston, K.K.; Dugan, J.E.; Hubbard, D.M.; Emery, K.A.; Grubbs, M.W. Using Dune Restoration on an Urban Beach as a Coastal Resilience Approach. Front. Mar. Sci. 2023, 10, 1187488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roig-Munar, F.X.; Martín-Prieto, J.Á.; Rodríguez-Perea, A.; Batista, Ó.O. Environmental Analysis and Classification of Coastal Sandy Systems of the Dominican Republic. In Beach Management Tools—Concepts, Methodologies and Case Studies; Botero, C., Cervantes, O., Finkl, C., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; Vol. 24, pp. 59–74. [Google Scholar]
- Carranza, M.L.; Acosta, A.; Stanisci, A.; Pirone, G.; Ciaschetti, G. Ecosystem Classification and EU Habitat Distribution Assessment in Sandy Coastal Environments. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2008, 140, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Carboni, M.; Carranza, M.L.; Acosta, A. Assessing Conservation Status on Coastal Dunes: A Multiscale Approach. Landsc. Urban Plan 2009, 91, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fenu, G.; Carboni, M.; Acosta, A.; Bacchetta, G. Environmental Factors Influencing Coastal Vegetation Pattern: New Insights from the Mediterranean Basin. Folia Geobot. 2013, 48, 493–508. [Google Scholar]
- Malavasi, M.; Bartak, V.; Carranza, M.L.; Simova, P.; Acosta, A.T.R. Landscape Pattern and Plant Biodiversity in Mediterranean Coastal Dune Ecosystems: Do Habitat Loss and Fragmentation Really Matter? J. Biogeogr 2018, 45, 1367–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van der Maarel, E. Some Remarks on the Functions of European Coastal Ecosystems. Phytocoenologia 2003, 33, 187–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martínez, M.; Psuty, N. Coastal Dunes: Ecology and Conservation; Springer-Verlag: Martínez, M.L, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Acosta, A.; Carranza, M.L.; Izzi, C.F. Are There Habitats That Contribute Best to Plant Species Diversity in Coastal Dunes? Biodivers. Conserv 2009, 18, 1087–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fenu, G.; Cogoni, D.; Ferrara, C.; Pinna, M.S.; Bacchetta, G. Relationships between Coastal Sand Dune Properties and Plant Community Distribution: The Case of Is Arenas (Sardinia. Plant Biosyst. 2012, 146, 586–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Delbosc, P.; Lagrange, I.; Rozo, C.; Bensettiti, F.; Bouzillé, J.B.; Evans, D.; Lalanne, A.; Rapinel, S.; Bioret, F. Assessing the Conservation Status of Coastal Habitats under Article 17 of the EU Habitats Directive. Biol. Conserv 2021, 254, 108935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prisco, I.; Acosta, A.T.; Stanisci, A. A Bridge between Tourism and Nature Conservation: Boardwalks Effects on Coastal Dune Vegetation. J. Coast. Conserv 2021, 25, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prisco, I.; Carboni, M.; Acosta, A.T.R. The Fate of Threatened Coastal Dune Habitats in Italy under Climate Change Scenarios. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, 68850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Motte, M. Fixation et Reboisement Des Dunes Maritimes En Tunisie et plus Spécialement Dans La Région de Bizerte. Rev. For. Fr. 1963, 5, 449–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ben Jelloul, M.; Jaziri, B. La Zone Sensible de l’extrême Nord Tunisien. Quel Modèle de Développement Local Dans Un Contexte de Durabilité ? Cah. FTDES 2022, 6, 58–84. [Google Scholar]
- Khabthani, M.A.; Touhami, I.; Mannai-Tayech, B.; Khaldi, A. Étude Diachronique de La Restauration Des Dunes Littorales de Zouaraa (Ouechtata-Nefza): Approche Par Télédétection et SIG. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the Soixantième anniversaire de la Recherche Forestière en Tunisie, Hammamet, Tunisia, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Kassouk, Z.; Ayari, E.; Deffontaines, B.; Ouaja, M. Monitoring Coastal Evolution and Geomorphological Processes Using Time-Series Remote Sensing and Geospatial Analysis: Application between Cape Serrat and Kef Abbed, Northern Tunisia. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 3895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanromualdo-Collado, A.; Hernández-Cordero, A.I.; Viera-Pérez, M.; Gallego-Fernández, J.B.; Hernández-Calvento, L. Coastal Dune Restoration in El Inglés Beach (Gran Canaria, Spain): A Trial Study. Rev. Estud. Andal. 2021, 41, 187–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Touhami, I.; Aouinti, H.; Khabthani, M.A.; Bergaoui, K.; Chirino, E.; Rzigui, T.; Bellot, J.; Khaldi, A.; Khouja, M.L.; Mannaï-Tayech, B. Monitoring Land-Cover Changes in Mediterranean Coastal Dunes, Northwest Tunisia, Using Remote Sensing Data. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj.-Napoca 2022, 50, 12794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Forêts, D.G.F.-D.G. Deuxième Inventaire Forestier et Pastoral National, Résultats Sur l’échelon de Jendouba; DGF: Tunis, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Farnole, P. Une Réserve Littorale Pour Le Tell Septentrional Tunisien. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the Journées Nationales Génie Civil/Génie Côtier, Caen, France, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Xie, Z.; Chen, Y.; Lu, D.; Li, G.; Chen, E. Classification of Land Cover, Forest, and Tree Species Classes with ZiYuan-3 Multispectral and Stereo Data. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seyam, M.M.H.; Haque, M.R.; Rahman, M.M. Identifying the Land Use Land Cover (LULC) Changes Using Remote Sensing and GIS Approach: A Case Study at Bhaluka in Mymensingh Bangladesh. Case Stud. Chem. Environ. Eng. 2023, 7, 100293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, Y.; Zhang, T.; Ye, Q.; Cai, J.; Wu, C.; Khirni Syed, A.; Li, J. Long-Term Remote Sensing Monitoring on LUCC around Chaohu Lake with New Information of Algal Bloom and Flood Submerging. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2021, 102, 102413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Popova, A. Improving the Accuracy of Tree Species Mapping by Sentinel-2 Images Using Auxiliary Data – A Case Study of Slyudyanskoye Forestry Area near Lake Baikal. Forests 2025, 16, 487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Higgins, S.I.; Bond, W.J.; February, E.C.; Bronn, A.; Euston-Brown, D.I.; Enslin, B. Effects of Four Decades of Fire Manipulation on Woody Vegetation Structure in Savanna. Ecology 2007, 88, 1119–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sapkota, R.P.; Dhital, N.B.; Rijal, K. Fire-Mediated Biomass Loss of Woody Species Seedlings Causing Demographic Bottleneck in the Terai Forests of Central Nepal. Glob. Ecol. Conserv 2023, 48, 2705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pourreza, M.; Hosseini, S.M.; Sinegani, A.A.S.; Matinizadeh, M.; Alavai, S.J. Herbaceous Species Diversity in Relation to Fire Severity in Zagros Oak Forests. Iran. J. For. Res. 2014, 25, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barbier, S.; Gosselin, F.; Balandier, P. Influence of Tree Species on Understory Vegetation Diversity and Mechanisms Involved - a Critical Review for Temperate and Boreal Forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 2008, 254, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gilliam, F.S. The Ecological Significance of the Herbaceous Layer in Temperate Forest Ecosystems. Bioscience 2007, 57, 845–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roberts, M.R. Response of the Herbaceous Layer to Natural Disturbance in North American Forests. Can. J. Bot. 2004, 82, 1273–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Halpern, C.B.; Lutz, J.A. Canoyear Closure Exerts Weak Controls on Understory Dynamics: A 30-Year Study of Overstory-Understory Interactions. Ecol. Monogr. 2013, 83, 221–237. [Google Scholar]
- Selmants, P.C.; Knight, D.H. Understory Plant Species Composition 30–50 Years after Clearcutting in Southeastern Wyoming Coniferous Forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 2003, 185, 275–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adili, B. Croissance, Fructification et Régénération Naturelle Des Peuplements Artificiels de Pin Pignon (Pinus Pinea L.) Au Nord de La Tunisie. 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Adili, B.; El Aouni, M.H.; Balandier, P. Influence of Stand and Tree Attributes and Silviculture on Cone and Seed Productions in Forests of Pinus Pinea L. in Northern Tunisia. In Mediterranean Stone Pine for Agroforestry; Mutke, S., Piqué, M., Calama, R., Eds.; CIHEAM/FAO/INIA/IRTA/CESEFOR/CTFC: Zaragoza, 2013; Vol. 105, pp. 9–14. [Google Scholar]
- Gao, S. Assessment of Remote-Sensed Vegetation Indices for Estimating Forest Chlorophyll Concentration. Ecol. Indic. 2024, 162, 112001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tucker, C.J. Red and Photographic Infrared Linear Combinations for Monitoring Vegetation. Remote Sens. Environ. 1979, 8, 127–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McFeeters, S.K. The Use of the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) in the Delineation of Open Water Features. Int. J. Remote Sens. 1996, 17, 1425–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zha, Y.; Gao, J.; Ni, S. Use of Normalized Difference Built-up Index in Automatically Mapping Urban Areas from TM Imagery. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2003, 24, 583–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sahar, A.A. Mapping Sandy Areas and Their Changes Using Remote Sensing. A Case Study at North-East Al-Muthanna Province, South of Iraq. Rev. Teledetec. 2021, 58, 39–52. [Google Scholar]
- Fadhil, A.M. Land Degradation Detection Using Geo-Information Technology for Some Sites in Iraq. Al-Nahrain J. Sci. 2009, 12, 94–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- You, H.; Huang, Y.; Qin, Z.; Chen, J.; Liu, Y. Forest Tree Species Classification Based on Sentinel-2 Images and Auxiliary Data. Forests 2022, 13, 1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruiz-Peinado, R.; Rio, M.; Montero, G. New Models for Estimating the Carbon Sink Capacity of Spanish Softwood Species. For. Syst. 2011, 20, 176–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Correia, A.C.; Faias, S.P.; Ruiz-Peinado, R.; Chianucci, F.; Cutini, A.; Fontes, L.; Manetti, M.C.; Montero, G.; Soares, P.; Tomé, M. Generalized Biomass Equations for Stone Pine (Pinus Pinea L.) across the Mediterranean Basin. For. Ecol. Manag. 2018, 429, 425–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cutini, A.; Chianucci, F.; Manetti, M.C. Allometric Relationships for Volume and Biomass for Stone Pine (Pinus Pinea L.) in Italian Coastal Stands. iForest 2013, 6, 331–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Medeiros, T.C.C.; Sampaio, E. Allometry of Aboveground Biomasses in Mangrove Species in Itamaracá, Pernambuco, Brazil. Wetl. Ecol. Manag. 2008, 16, 323–330. [Google Scholar]
- Shaiek, O.; Loustau, D.; Garchi, S.; Bachtobji, B.; El Aouni, M.H. Estimation Allométrique de La Biomasse Du Pin Maritime En Dune Littorale: Cas de La Forêt de Rimel (Tunisie. Forêt Méditerranéenne 2010, 31, 231–242. [Google Scholar]
- IPCC Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry; IPCC National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme 2003.
- Ruíz-Peinado, R.; Bravo-Oviedo, A.; Montero, G.; Río, M. Carbon Stocks in a Scots Pine Afforestation under Different Thinning Intensities Management. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Chang. 2014, 21, 1059–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rapp, M.; Cabanettes, A. BIOMASS AND PRODUCTIVITY OF A PINUS PINEA L. STAND. Components Product. Mediterr. Reg.-Basic A R D. Asp. 1981, 131–132. [Google Scholar]
- Rodin, L.E.; Bazilevich, N.I. Production and Mineral Cycling in Terrestrial Vegetation; Oliver, Boyd, Eds.; 1967. [Google Scholar]
- Rapp, M. Le Cycle Biogéochimique Dans Un Bois de Pins d’Alep. In Écologie Forestière; Pesson, P., Ed.; Gauthier-Villars: Paris, France, 1974; pp. 75–97. [Google Scholar]
- Gonçalves, A.C.; Sousa, A.M.O.; Silva, J.R.M. Pinus Pinea above Ground Biomass Estimation with Very High Spatial Resolution Satellite Images. In Mediterranean Pine Nuts from Forests and Plantations; Carrasquinho, I., Correia, A.C., Mutke, S., Eds.; CIHEAM: Zaragoza, 2017; Vol. 122, pp. 49–54. [Google Scholar]
- Correia, A.C.; Tomé, M.; Carlos, P.; Faias, S.; Dias, A.; Freire, J.; Carvalho, P.O.; Pereira, J.S. Biomass Allometry and Carbon Factors for a Mediterranean Pine (Pinus Pinea L.) in Portugal. For. Syst. 2010, 19, 418–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belhadj-Khedher, C.; Koutsias, N.; Karamitsou, A.; El-Melki, T.; Ouelhazi, B.; Hamdi, A.; Nouri, H.; Mouillot, F. A Revised Historical Fire Regime Analysis in Tunisia (1985–2010) from a Critical Analysis of the National Fire Database and Remote Sensing. Forests 2018, 9, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turquety, S.; Menut, L.; Bessagnet, B.; Anav, A.; Viovy, N.; Maignan, F.; Wooster, M. APIFLAME v1.0: High-Resolution Fire Emission Model and Application to the Euro-Mediterranean Region. Geosci. Model Dev. 2014, 7, 587–612. [Google Scholar]
- Rezgui, F.; Mouillot, F.; Semmar, N.; Zribi, L.; Khaldi, A.; Nasr, Z.; Gharbi, F. Assessment of Pinus Halepensis Forests’ Vulnerability Using the Temporal Dynamics of Carbon Stocks and Fire Traits in Tunisia. Fire 1981, 7, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vallet, L.; Schwartz, M.; Ciais, P.; Wees, D.; Truchis, A.; Mouillot, F. High-Resolution Data Reveal a Surge of Biomass Loss from Temperate and Atlantic Pine Forests, Contextualizing the 2022 Fire Season Distinctiveness in France. Biogeosciences 2023, 20, 3803–3825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Drius, M.; Carranza, M.L.; Stanisci, A.; Jones, L. The Role of Italian Coastal Dunes as Carbon Sinks and Diversity Sources: A Multi-Service Perspective. Appl. Geogr. 2016, 75, 127–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Retana, J.; Maria Espelta, J.; Habrouk, A.; Luis OrdoÑEz, J.; de Solà-Morales, F. Regeneration Patterns of Three Mediterranean Pines and Forest Changes after a Large Wildfire in Northeastern Spain. Écoscience 2016, 9, 89–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]










| Landsat 5&7 | Landsat 8&9 | ||
| Feature | Importance score | Feature | Importance score |
| B4 NIR | 0.1334 | B5 NIR | 0.1272 |
| B2 Green | 0.1099 | B6 SWIR1 | 0.1075 |
| B5 SWIR1 | 0.1079 | B3 Green | 0.1032 |
| B1 Blue | 0.1042 | B10 TIRS | 0.0916 |
| B3 Red | 0.0904 | B2 Blue | 0.0888 |
| B7 SWIR2 | 0.0879 | B7 SWIR2 | 0.0862 |
| NDWI | 0.0719 | B4 Red | 0.0811 |
| B6 TIRS | 0.0637 | NDWI | 0.0772 |
| NDSAI | 0.0619 | B1 Coast | 0.0694 |
| NDBI | 0.0589 | NDVI | 0.0480 |
| NDVI | 0.0561 | NDBI | 0.0455 |
| NDSDI | 0.0533 | NDSAI | 0.0436 |
| NDSDI | 0.0307 | ||
| 1994 | Land class | 2024 | |||||||
| Water | Sand | Urban | Forest | Shrub | Agriculture | Bare soil | Total area | ||
| Water | 10,154 (99.9%) |
3 (<0.1%) |
0(0%) | 0(0%) | 2 (<0.1%) |
0(0%) | 0(0%) | 10,159 | |
| Sand | 291 (13.2%) |
669 (30.3%) |
32 (1.4%) |
196 (8.9%) |
996 (45.1%) |
14 (0.6%) |
11 (0.5%) |
2,209 | |
| Urban | 0(0.0%) | 3 (6.1%) |
41 (83.7%) |
0(0%) | 3 (6.1%) |
2 (2.4%) |
1 (2.0%) |
50 | |
| Forest | 67 (0.6%) |
16 (0.2%) |
5 (<0.1%) |
8,543 (80.3%) |
1,596 (15.0%) |
319 (3.0%) |
92 (0.9%) |
10,639 | |
| Shrub | 1,343 (11.5%) |
463 (4.0%) |
158 (1.3%) |
2,000 (17.1%) |
5,145 (44.0%) |
2,344 (20.0%) |
254 (2.2%) |
11,707 | |
| Agriculture | 185 (5.6%) |
65 (2.0%) |
69 (2.1%) |
303 (9.1%) |
833 (25.1%) |
1,839 (55.3%) |
33 (1.0%) |
3,326 | |
| Bare soil | 4 (1.4%) |
42 (14.3%) |
20 (6.8%) |
36 (12.2%) |
125 (42.5%) |
33 (11.2%) |
34 (11.6%) |
294 | |
| Total area | 12,043 | 1,262 | 325 | 11,078 | 8,700 | 4,551 | 426 | ||
| Year | Water | Sand | Forest | Shrub | Agriculture | Bare soil |
| 1994 | 443.58 | 1902.58 | 1516.51 | 2305.46 | 19.17 | 10.41 |
| 2024 | 873.73 | 672.00 | 2038.84 | 2519.45 | 65.76 | 27.93 |
| Sand | Forest | Shrubland | Agriculture | |
| 1994-1998 | 10.27 | 0.07 | 16.22 | 3.16 |
| 1998-2002 | 6.53 | 0.14 | 14.14 | 17.44 |
| 2002-2006 | 12.20 | 0 | 21.54 | 11.56 |
| 2006-2010 | 17.44 | 0 | 16.87 | 18.88 |
| 2010-2012 | 17.44 | 0 | 29.22 | 4.74 |
| 2012-2014 | 14.14 | 0.14 | 20.10 | 29.58 |
| 2014-2016 | 34.03 | 0.072 | 15.29 | 6.53 |
| 2016-2018 | 9.26 | 0.14 | 59.51 | 30.00 |
| 2018-2020 | 22.47 | 1.79 | 18.52 | 43.07 |
| 2020-2022 | 26.35 | 0.65 | 61.88 | 36.18 |
| 2022-2024 | 24.05 | 0.36 | 23.90 | 48.09 |
| 1994-2024 | 30.44 | 4.52 | 135.53 | 68.49 |
| Sand | Forest | Shrubland | Soil | |
| 1994-1998 | 0.29 | 201.29 | 2189.52 | 5.59 |
| 1998-2002 | 4.74 | 107.89 | 2365.26 | 43.07 |
| 2002-2006 | 9.26 | 82.05 | 923.04 | 207.82 |
| 2006-2010 | 4.16 | 43.72 | 694.62 | 93.11 |
| 2010-2012 | 49.25 | 213.78 | 2219.74 | 222.54 |
| 2012-2014 | 36.97 | 156.86 | 1077.67 | 344.58 |
| 2014-2016 | 263.17 | 151.47 | 1016.79 | 744.94 |
| 2016-2018 | 70.71 | 172.36 | 810.62 | 17.30 |
| 2018-2020 | 63.17 | 399.49 | 556.49 | 52.84 |
| 2020-2022 | 42.49 | 395.05 | 1039.69 | 63.17 |
| 2022-2024 | 81.62 | 92.18 | 689.23 | 41.56 |
| Year | Forest | Shrub | Bare soil | Burned |
| 2022 | 171 | 239 | 20 | |
| 2024 | 69 | 197 | 131 | 63 |
| Losses 2022-2024 | 102 | 42 | 111 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).