Submitted:
29 June 2026
Posted:
30 June 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
- a.
- Medical records study
- b.
- In-vitro study
3. Results
- a.
- Medical records study
- b.
- In-vitro study
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- NAIR; Ramanchandran, P.N. Pathogenesis of apical periodontitis and the causes of endodontic failures. Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med. 2004, 15.6, 348–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- SIQUEIRA JR; José, F.; RÔÇAS; Isabela, N. Clinical implications and microbiology of bacterial persistence after treatment procedures. J. Endod. 2008, 34.11, 1291–1301. e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- BROOK, Itzhak. Microbiology and management of endodontic infections in children. J. Clin. Pediatr. Dent. 2004, 28.1, 13–17. Available online: https://oss.jocpd.com/files/article/20220907-1322/pdf/JOCPD28.1.13.pdf. [CrossRef]
- SLOTS, Jørgen. Selection of antimicrobial agents in periodontal therapy. J. Periodontal Res. 2002, 37.5, 389–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- TAJ, Shifa; et al. Metronidazole Induced Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reaction-A Systematic Review of Descriptive Studies. Curr. Rev. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Former. Curr. Clin. Pharmacol. 2024, 19.3, 269–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- LÖFMARK, Sonja; EDLUND, Charlotta; NORD, Carl Erik. Metronidazole is still the drug of choice for treatment of anaerobic infections. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2010, 50. Supplement_1, S16–S23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- KURIYAMA, T.; et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility of 800 anaerobic isolates from patients with dentoalveolar infection to 13 oral antibiotics. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 2007, 22.4, 285–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- DAR-ODEH, Najla; et al. Evaluation of metronidazole oral monotherapy in anaerobic oral infections. Int. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2024, 62.11, 517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- WAHYUDI, Didi; LUBIS, Leonardo. Replantation of an avulsed-tooth by using trepanation: A Case Report. J. Clin. Cas. Rep. Med. Imag. Heal. Sci. 2024, 8, 1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- WAHYUDI, Didi; KUSUMASARI, Citra. Oxygen as obturation biomaterial in endodontic treatment: development of novel membranous dental restoration system. F1000Research 2024, 12, 380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- KOMINE, Chiaki; et al. Application of reactive oxygen species in dental treatment. J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12.9, 1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- IMLAY, James A. The molecular mechanisms and physiological consequences of oxidative stress: lessons from a model bacterium. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2013, 11.7, 443–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- YANG, Shipeng; et al. Strategies and mechanisms targeting Enterococcus faecalis biofilms associated with endodontic infections: a comprehensive review. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2024, 14, 1433313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- RÔÇAS, I. N.; SIQUEIRA JR, J. F. Root canal microbiota of teeth with chronic apical periodontitis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2008, 46.11, 3599–3606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- FISHER, Katie; PHILLIPS, Carol. The ecology, epidemiology and virulence of Enterococcus. Microbiology 2009, 155.6, 1749–1757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- LOKITHA, R.; et al. Antimicrobial therapeutic strategies for Enterococcus Faecalis in dental infections-past, present and future. Anti-Infect. Agents 2023, 21.3, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DINGSDAG, Simon A.; HUNTER, Neil. Metronidazole: an update on metabolism, structure–cytotoxicity and resistance mechanisms. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2018, 73.2, 265–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- GAETTI-JARDIM JÚNIOR, Elerson; et al. Susceptibility of strict and facultative anaerobes Isolated from endodontic infections to metronidazole and beta-lactams. J. Appl. Oral Sci. 2007, 15, 539–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- OROZCO-GALLEGO, Manuel J.; et al. Effectiveness of irrigation protocols in endodontic therapy: An umbrella review. Dent. J. 2025, 13.6, 273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- GENC SEN, Ozgur; ERDEMIR, Ali. The effectiveness of three different irrigant activation methods in the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis from root canals. Photobiomodulation Photomed. Laser Surg. 2024, 42.10, 628–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- DE LIMA, Francine Santos Fernandes; FACURY, Analia Gabriella Borges Ferraz. Enterococcus faecalis and Endodontic Treatment Failure: A Qualitative Systematic Review of Its Role and Elimination Strategies. Aust. Endod. J. 2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- SUNDQVIST, Göran; et al. Microbiologic analysis of teeth with failed endodontic treatment and the outcome of conservative re-treatment. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology 1998, 85.1, 86–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- KRISHNA; Kondapalli, Vamsi; et al. Enterococcus species and their probiotic potential: Current status and future prospects. J. Appl. Biol. Biotechnol. 2022, 11, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- NIX, Ned Leonard; ZUSMAN, Nicholas T.; DÜZGÜNEŞ, Nejat. Odontogenic Infections Resistant to Empiric Therapy, Opportunistic Prevotella, and Metronidazole: A Clinical Case Series and Review of the Literature. Oral 2025, 5.1: 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- SHAKYA, Neelam; et al. Epidemiology, microbiology and antibiotic sensitivity of odontogenic space infections in Central India. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. 2018, 17, 324–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- CHAMORRO-PETRONACCI; Cintia, Micaela; et al. Efficacy of ciprofloxacin, metronidazole and minocycline in ordered mesoporous silica against Enterococcus faecalis for dental pulp revascularization: an in-vitro study. Materials 2022, 15.6, 2266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- RAMADAN, Asmaa; et al. Fully characterized effective bacteriophages specific against antibiotic-resistant Enterococcus faecalis, the Causative Agent of Dental Abscess. Medicina 2024, 60.3, 501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- WONG, Jasmine; et al. Microbiological aspects of root canal infections and disinfection strategies: an update review on the current knowledge and challenges. Front. Oral Health 2021, 2, 672887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- OLSEN, Ingar; DAHLÉN, Gunnar. Salient virulence factors in anaerobic bacteria, with emphasis on their importance in endodontic infections. Endod. Top. 2004, 9.1, 15–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- FREEMAN, Collin D.; KLUTMAN, Neil E.; LAMP, Kenneth C. Metronidazole: a therapeutic review and update. Drugs 1997, 54, 679–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- FIEDLER, Michaela K.; et al. Metronidazole and ether derivatives target Helicobacter pylori via simultaneous stress induction and inhibition. Nat. Microbiol. 2026, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- BROOK, Itzhak. Microbiology of polymicrobial abscesses and implications for therapy. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2002, 50.6, 805–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- KURIYAMA, Tomoari; et al. Bacteriologic features and antimicrobial susceptibility in isolates from orofacial odontogenic infections. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology 2000, 90.5, 600–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- PEDIZZI, Chiara; et al. Effect of oxygen on the microbial activities of thermophilic anaerobic biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 211, 765–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- YAMADA, Yoko; et al. Association of odor from infected root canal analyzed by an electronic nose with isolated bacteria. J. Endod. 2007, 33.9, 1106–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- AHMED, H. M. A.; NEELAKANTAN, P.; DUMMER, P. M. H. A new system for classifying accessory canal morphology. Int. Endod. J. 2018, 51.2, 164–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- DZANKOVIC, Aida; et al. Endodontic Challenges Arising from Root Canal Morphology. In Human Teeth-The Intersection of Science, Disease, and Clinical Practice; IntechOpen, 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]





| Case | Age | Sex | Follow-up record |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 80 | M | The condition has improved, with some complaints recorded |
| 2 | 27 | M | The condition has clearly improved, with zero complaints recorded |
| 3 | 45 | F | The condition has clearly improved, with zero complaints recorded |
| 4 | 42 | M | The condition has clearly improved, with zero complaints recorded |
| 5 | 28 | F | The condition has clearly improved, with zero complaints recorded |
| 6 | 59 | M | The condition has clearly improved, with zero complaints recorded |
| 7 | 55 | F | The condition has clearly improved, with zero complaints recorded |
| 8 | 52 | F | The condition has clearly improved, with zero complaints recorded |
| 9 | 44 | F | The condition has clearly improved, with zero complaints recorded |
| 10 | 55 | F | The condition has improved, with some complaints recorded |
| 11 | 27 | F | The condition has clearly improved, with zero complaints recorded |
| 12 | 45 | M | The condition has clearly improved, with zero complaints recorded |
| 13 | 45 | M | The condition has clearly improved, with zero complaints recorded |
| 14 | 56 | M | The condition has not significantly improved, with complaints largely remaining the same as the previous visit |
| 15 | 8 | M | The condition has clearly improved, with zero complaints recorded |
| 16 | 9 | M | The condition has clearly improved, with zero complaints recorded |
| 17 | 57 | M | The condition has clearly improved, with zero complaints recorded |
| 18 | 26 | F | The condition has clearly improved, with zero complaints recorded |
| 19 | 34 | M | The condition has clearly improved, with zero complaints recorded |
| 20 | 26 | F | The condition has clearly improved, with zero complaints recorded |
| 21 | 63 | F | The condition has clearly improved, with zero complaints recorded |
| 22 | 33 | F | The condition has clearly improved, with zero complaints recorded |
| 23 | 8 | F | The condition has clearly improved, with zero complaints recorded |
| 24 | 34 | F | The condition has clearly improved, with zero complaints recorded |
| 25 | 69 | F | The condition has clearly improved, with zero complaints recorded |
| 26 | 42 | F | The condition has clearly improved, with zero complaints recorded |
| 27 | 34 | F | The condition has not significantly improved, with complaints largely remaining the same as the previous visit |
| 28 | 28 | F | The condition has clearly improved, with zero complaints recorded |
| 29 | 35 | F | The condition has clearly improved, with zero complaints recorded |
| 30 | 40 | F | The condition has clearly improved, with zero complaints recorded |
| 31 | 48 | F | The condition has clearly improved, with zero complaints recorded |
| 32 | 27 | M | The condition has clearly improved, with zero complaints recorded |
| 33 | 61 | F | The condition has clearly improved, with zero complaints recorded |
| 34 | 30 | M | The condition has clearly improved, with zero complaints recorded |
| 35 | 54 | F | The condition has clearly improved, with zero complaints recorded |
| 36 | 63 | M | The condition has not significantly improved, with complaints largely remaining the same as the previous visit |
| 37 | 3 | F | The condition has clearly improved, with zero complaints recorded |
| 38 | 46 | M | The condition has clearly improved, with zero complaints recorded |
| 39 | 66 | F | The condition has clearly improved, with zero complaints recorded |
| 40 | 51 | M | The condition has clearly improved, with zero complaints recorded |
| 41 | 40 | F | The condition has clearly improved, with zero complaints recorded |
| 42 | 21 | M | The condition has clearly improved, with zero complaints recorded |
| 43 | 33 | M | The condition has clearly improved, with zero complaints recorded |
| 44 | 50 | F | The condition has clearly improved, with zero complaints recorded |
| 45 | 43 | M | The condition has clearly improved, with zero complaints recorded |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).