1. Introduction
Heavy metal contamination of aquatic environments has become a major environmental concern as a consequence of intensified industrialization and the continuous release of metal-bearing effluents from sectors such as mining, metallurgy, electroplating, fertilizer and pesticide production, food processing, and pharmaceutical manufacturing. Unlike many organic pollutants, heavy metals are not biodegradable and can persist in aquatic systems, accumulate in sediments and biota, and subsequently enter the food chain, posing long-term ecological and human health risks [
1]. Because of their persistence, toxicity, and ecological impacts, these metals are considered major contributors to ecosystem degradation and are routinely monitored as priority pollutants worldwide [
2]. Particular attention has been given to Zn(II) and Cd(II), which are frequently detected in contaminated waters. Although zinc is recognized as an essential micronutrient involved in numerous biological processes, its presence at elevated concentrations may cause harmful effects, including gastrointestinal disorders, skin irritation, fever, and hematological disturbances. Cadmium is even more concerning because of its pronounced toxicity and high bioaccumulation potential, making its occurrence in aquatic systems especially problematic even at low concentrations [
3]. Cadmium is introduced into surface waters through mining and metallurgical activities, battery manufacturing, electroplating, pigment production, phosphate fertilizers, and industrial wastewater discharges. Zinc, although less toxic than cadmium, may also exert harmful effects at elevated concentrations, causing toxicity to aquatic biota and disrupting ecological balance. Furthermore, the simultaneous presence of these metals in contaminated waters represents a challenge for water treatment and environmental protection. For these reasons, the development of efficient, low-cost, and sustainable materials for their removal from water remains of significant scientific and practical interest.
Conventional treatment methods for heavy-metal-contaminated water can be effective, but they are often associated with high operational costs, sludge generation, and reduced efficiency at low pollutant concentrations. For this reason, biosorption has attracted increasing attention as a low-cost and environmentally friendly alternative. Biosorption can remove metal ions through a combination of ion exchange, surface complexation, electrostatic attraction, and precipitation, while using abundant biological materials or waste-derived sorbents [
1,
4]. Crustacean shell waste is particularly promising in this context because it contains chitin, proteins, and calcium carbonate, all of which provide functional groups and mineral phases favorable for metal binding.
At the same time, the management of invasive aquatic species represents another important environmental challenge. The Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) [
5] has identified Invasive Alien Species (IAS), organisms introduced by humans into regions beyond their natural range, as one of the five primary direct drivers of global biodiversity loss. IPBES emphasizes that invasive species represent one of the most serious threats to biodiversity and human well-being in the coming decade. As stated in the EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 [
6], Invasive alien species can severely compromise efforts to protect and restore natural ecosystems. In addition to causing extensive harm to biodiversity and the economy, many of these species also contribute to the emergence and spread of infectious diseases, endangering both humans and wildlife. Their introduction rate has risen markedly in recent years. In Europe alone, 354 of the 1,872 species currently classified as threatened are impacted by invasive alien species. Without effective prevention and control measures, the pace of invasion and the associated risks to nature and human health will continue to escalate
. The implementation of the EU Invasive Alien Species Regulation [
7], along with other relevant legislation and international agreements, must be further strengthened. These efforts should focus on minimizing, and where possible, preventing the introduction and establishment of alien species within the EU environment. The overarching goal is to effectively manage established invasive alien species and reduce the number of Red List species currently threatened by them by 50%.
The spiny-cheek crayfish
Faxonius limosus (Rafinesque, 1817), also known as
Orconectes limosus, belongs to the largest crayfish family,
Cambaridae, which includes 14 genera and 441 species. Native to North and Central America, it was the first non-native crayfish species introduced into Europe. The only recorded successful introduction occurred in 1890, when 90 individuals supplied by the US Commission of Fish and Fisheries were released into a fishpond in western Poland. Since then, the species has spread widely and is now present in rivers, canals, and lakes across 23 European countries. [
8]. It is an omnivorous species that feeds on aquatic plants, fish eggs, and various invertebrates, thereby negatively impacting the biodiversity. Moreover, it serves as a carrier of the crayfish plague, a disease fatal to native European crayfish. Through its extensive burrowing activity, it can also destabilize riverbanks and alter aquatic habitats. Since its introduction,
F. limosus has become the most widespread non-indigenous crayfish species in Europe and is now listed among the invasive alien species (IAS) of Union concern under EU regulations 2016/1141 [
9].
Faxonius limosus is adaptable to a wide variety of environmental conditions, and is an active migrator that can live and reproduce in brackish waters with salinity up to 10% [
10]. Taking into account the above, there is an urgent need to monitor and prevent its further spread in the inland waters of Serbia and the Danube River Basin, in order to address the problem of its impact on biodiversity. The first record of
F. limosus in Serbia dates back to 2002, when it was observed in the Danube River near Apatin. Since then, the species has expanded its distribution throughout the entire section of the Danube, the Sava, Tisa, Velika Morava, and Tamiš rivers [
11].
The aim of this study was to investigate the potential use of
Faxonius Limosus crayfish shells as a biosorbent for the removal of zinc and cadmium ions from water. After crayfish were collected from various locations along the course of the Danube River in Serbia, and the meat was separated, a large amount of shell waste remained and was utilized in this research. Batch adsorption experiments were conducted to investigate the removal efficiency of Zn(II) and Cd(II) from model aqueous solutions using the prepared material, whereas the adsorption behavior was further interpreted through kinetic and isotherm modeling. Given the substantial quantities of this type of waste generated worldwide, its application as a biosorbent has been the subject of increasing research interest in previous years. Several studies have demonstrated that crayfish shells can be effectively used as adsorbents in wastewater treatment [
12,
13]. However, a review of the available literature revealed that no data have been reported regarding the adsorption performance of the
Faxonius limosus shells.
Additionally, this research proposes a solution to the problem of loaded adsorbent by utilizing it as a bio-filler in rubber production. Despite considerable advances in elucidating adsorption mechanisms and the growing number of studies addressing process modelling and optimization, the large-scale implementation of biosorption-based technologies remains limited. A key challenge lies in the fact that much of the existing research has primarily emphasized enhancing sorption efficiency and removal performance, while comparatively little attention has been devoted to the end-of-life management of spent biosorbents. In practical applications, biosorbents are typically subjected to multiple adsorption–desorption cycles; however, progressive deterioration of their sorption capacity ultimately necessitates their replacement [
14,
15,
16]. The subsequent handling of exhausted biosorbents, often referred to as post-sorbents, is insufficiently addressed in the literature. At present, disposal in landfills or thermal treatment via incineration represent the most common management strategies. Both approaches raise serious environmental concerns, as landfilling may enable the remobilization of heavy metals through leaching and desorption processes, whereas incineration can lead to the release of hazardous gaseous emissions and the formation of metal-enriched ash residues. Consequently, the development of environmentally sound strategies for the management of metal-laden post-sorbents is essential. In recent years, increasing research efforts have been directed toward the valorization of exhausted biosorbents containing heavy metals, considering both technological feasibility and environmental sustainability. Several studies indicate that such materials can serve as secondary resources for the production of value-added products, thereby mitigating the risks associated with hazardous waste disposal while simultaneously offering potential economic benefits [
17,
18].