Submitted:
03 June 2026
Posted:
04 June 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Extraction of Collagen from Octopus maya
2.2. Preparation of Film-Forming Solutions (FFS)
2.3. Rheological Characterization
2.3.1. Flow Behavior
2.3.2. Viscoelastic Behavior
2.4. Experimental Desing and Statistical Analysis
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Flow Behavior
3.1.1. Flow Behavior of Control Film-Forming Solutions
3.1.2. Flow Behavior of Film-Forming Solutions
3.2. Viscoelastic Behavior
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Zhao, Y.; Li, B.; Li, C.; Xu, Y.; Luo, Y.; Liang, D.; Huang, C. Comprehensive review of polysaccharide-based materials in edible packaging: A sustainable approach. Foods 2021, 10(8), 1845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, Y.; Ma, C.; Xu, Y.; Du, L.; Yang, X. Food gels based on polysaccharide and protein: Preparation, formation mechanisms, and delivery of bioactive substances. Gels 2024, 10(11), 735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saha, D.; Bhattacharya, S. Hydrocolloids as thickening and gelling agents in food: A critical review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2010, 47(6), 587–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nieto, M. B. Structure and function of polysaccharide gum-based edible films and coatings. In Edible films and coatings for food applications; Huber, K., Embuscado, M., Eds.; Springer, 2009; pp. 57–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Zhang, F.; Yuan, R. Applications of natural polymer-based hydrogels in the food industry. In Hydrogels based on natural polymers; Reddy, M. M., Mishra, A. K., Thakur, M., Eds.; Elsevier, 2020; pp. 357–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aranaz, I.; Alcántara, A. R.; Civera, M. C.; Arias, C.; Elorza, B.; Heras Caballero, A.; Acosta, N. Chitosan: An overview of its properties and applications. Polymers 2021, 13(19), 3256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mitantsoa, J. T.; Ravelonandro, P. H.; Andrianony, F. A.; Andrianaivoravelona, R. R. Elaboration and characterization of bioplastic films based on bitter cassava starch (Manihot esculenta) reinforced by chitosan extracted from crab (Shylla seratta) shells. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2310.15172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Li, S.; Yu, J.; Wang, S. The effect of protein–starch interaction on the structure and properties of starch and its application in flour products. Foods 2025, 14(4), 778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meisenberg, G.; Simmons, W. H. Principios de bioquímica médica, 4.ª ed.; Elsevier, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Ahmad, M. I.; Li, Y.; Pan, J.; Liu, F.; Dai, H.; Fu, Y.; Huang, T.; Farooq, S.; Zhang, H. Collagen and gelatin: Structure, properties, and applications in food industry. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 254 2024, 128037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ricard-Blum, S. The collagen family. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2011, 3(1), a004978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, M.; Verma, A. K.; Patel, R. Collagen extraction and recent biological activities of collagen peptides derived from sea-food waste: A review. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 18 2020, 100315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farooq, S.; Ahmad, M. I.; Zheng, S.; et al. A review on marine collagen: Sources, extraction methods, colloids properties, and food applications. Collagen Leather 2024, 6, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Comisión Nacional de Acuacultura y Pesca. Anuario estadístico de acuacultura y pesca 2023. Secretaría de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural. 2023. Available online: https://nube.conapesca.gob.mx/sites/cona/dgppe/2023/ANUARIO_ESTADISTICO_DE_ACUACULTURA_Y_PESCA_2023.pdf.
- Ocampo-García, L. Extracción de colágeno de subproductos de pulpo maya (Octopus maya) y su caracterización tecnofuncional. Tesis de maestría, Maestría en Ciencias en Innovación Biotecnológica, Centro de Investigación y Asistencia en Tecnología y Diseño del Estado de Jalisco, A.C., 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Tapia Vásquez, A. E. Identificación y caracterización estructural de los diferentes tipos de piridinolina presentes en fibras de colágeno de pulpo (Octopus vulgaris) y calamar gigante (Dosidicus gigas). Tesis de doctorado, Universidad de Sonora, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Torres-Arreola, W.; Pacheco-Aguilar, R.; Sotelo-Mundo, R.; Rouzaud-Sandez, O.; Ezquerra-Brauer, J. Caracterización parcial del colágeno extraído a partir del manto, aleta y tentáculos de calamar gigante (Dosidicus gigas). Cienc. Y Tecnol. Aliment. 2008, 6(2), 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moscoso, J. L. A. Estudio de biopelículas de compósitos de colágeno de calamar gigante (Dosidicus gigas) y quitosina. Tesis de maestría, Universidad de Sonora, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Sánchez-Soto, J. M.; López-Alcántara, R.; Sánchez-González, A. del P.; Torres-Mendoza, E. J. Evaluation of mechanical properties of matrices derived from fish scale collagen. Rev. Colomb. De Investig. Agroindustriales 2022, 9(2), 119–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ulfariati, C.; Aprilia, S.; Munawar, A. A. Development of biocomposite edible film food packaging based on gelatin from chicken claw waste. Case Stud. Chem. Environ. Eng. 2023, 8, 100371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ribeiro, A. M.; Estevinho, B. N.; Rocha, F. Preparation and incorporation of functional ingredients in edible films and coatings. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2021, 14, 209–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chakravartula, S. S. N.; Soccio, M.; Lotti, N.; Balestra, F.; Dalla Rosa, M.; Siracusa, V. Characterization of composite edible films based on pectin/alginate/whey protein concentrate. Materials 2019, 12(15), 2454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rossman, J. M. Commercial manufacture of edible films. In Edible films and coatings for food applications; Huber, K., Embuscado, M., Eds.; Springer, 2009; pp. 367–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramírez-Sucre, M. O.; Baigts-Allende, D. K. Efecto del tratamiento térmico en el comportamiento reológico de salsas de chile habanero (Capsicum chinense) adicionadas con gomas guar y xantana. Agrociencia 2016, 50(7), 837–847. Available online: http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1405-31952016000700837.
- Gonapinuwala, S. T.; Kirk, S.; Jones, J. R.; et al. Collagen with native triple-helical structure from representative cold-water and warm-water fish skins using a modified protocol. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2025, 18, 7993–8007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kawamata, H.; Kuwaki, S.; Mishina, T.; Ikoma, T.; Tanaka, J.; Nozaki, R. Hierarchical viscosity of aqueous solution of tilapia scale collagen investigated via dielectric spectroscopy between 500 MHz and 2.5 THz. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 45398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ding, C.; Zhang, M.; Li, G. Rheological properties of collagen/hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (COL/HPMC) blended solutions. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014, 131(7), 40042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, P.; Li, X.; Li, H.; Li, J.; Tang, B.; Zheng, T. Development of active film based on collagen and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose incorporating apple polyphenol for food packaging. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 273 2024, 132960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heidenreich, A. C.; Pérez-Recalde, M.; González Wusener, A.; Hermida, É. B. Collagen and chitosan blends for 3D bioprinting: A rheological and printability approach. Polym. Test. 2020, 82, 106297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, T.; Tang, P.; Shen, L.; Bu, H.; Li, G. Rheological behavior of collagen/chitosan blended solutions. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2021, e50840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herrada-Manchón, H.; Fernández, M. A.; Aguilar, E. Essential guide to hydrogel rheology in extrusion 3D printing: How to measure it and why it matters? Gels 2023, 9(7), 517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ghani, A.; Okada, M.; Sun, B.; Zhang, X.; Higuchi, I.; Takagi, Y. Comparative Study of the Gel-Forming Ability of Type I Collagens Extracted from Different Organs and Fish Species. Gels 2025, 11(7), 533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tang, C.; Zhang, L.; Huang, Q. Mechanisms of gel formation in collagen/hydroxypropyl methylcellulose aqueous mixtures. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 251, 142407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]




| Nomenclature | Base of FFS system | Concentration (%) | |
| Polysaccharide | Glycerol | ||
| FFS-CIPM | Insoluble collagen | 3 | 0.6 |
| FFS-H | HPMC | 2 | 1 |
| FFS-Ch | Chitosan | 0.5 | 0.6 |
| FFS-S | Starch | 2.5 | 2 |
| Treatments | |||||||
| Proportion (%) (FFS-PS: FFS-CIPM) |
η (Pa.s) |
η0 (Pa.s) |
η∞ (Pa.s) |
κ (s) |
n | α | |
| C30:70H | 0.3 ± 0.05 | 35.84 ± 32.51 | 0.03 ± 0.00 | 151.85 ± 58.13 | 0.09 ± 0.13 | 72.28 ± 0.50 | |
| HPMC | C50:50H | 3.14 ± 0.38 | 412.49 ± 8.62 | 0.04 ± 0.004 | 445.44 ± 17.60 | 0.21 ± 0.01 | 30.49 ± 33.88 |
| C70:30H | 8.43 ± 0.16 | 1454.70 ± 170.03 | 0.10 ± 0.004 | 360.48 ± 44.41 | 0.15 ± 0.03 | 8.41 ± 0.04 | |
| C30:70Ch | 1.47 ± 0.26 | 109.07 ± 64.69 | 0.06 ± 0.002 | 656.77 ± 200.96 | 0.36 ± 0.04 | 35.76 ± 0.25 | |
| Chitosan | C50:50Ch | 1.84 ± 0.02 | 110.87 ± 33.28 | 0.04 ± 0.002 | 540.72 ± 274.14 | 0.35 ± 0.003 | 21.70 ± 27.53 |
| C70:30Ch | 10.44 ± 0.59 | 1052.64 ± 76.75 | 0.23 ± 0.11 | 481.23 ± 2.04 | 0.25 ± 0.01 | 68.09 ± 3.21 | |
| C30:70S | 197.53 ± 80.21 | 103631 ± 14116.68 | 1.37 ± 1.38 | 979.71 ± 336.09 | 0.09 ± 0.03 | 37.93 ± 24.15 | |
| Starch | C50:50S | 79.63 ± 1.61 | 23410.85 ± 3955.91 | 2.10 ± 2.91 | 808.64 ± 66.03 | 0.09 ± 0.05 | 42.75 ± 10.64 |
| C70:30S | 33.54 ± 0.60 | 23665.80 ± 830.85 | 0.06 ± 0.06 | 1864.20 ± 86.75 | 0.14 ± 0.01 | 13.33 ± 0.98 | |
| Factors | η0 (Pa.s) |
η∞ (Pa.s) |
κ (s) |
n | α |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polysaccharide type (A) | <0.0001 | 0.1835 | <0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.5833 |
| Proportion (B) | <0.0001 | 0.6441 | 0.0159 | 0.4592 | 0.1653 |
| AxB | <0.0001 | 0.6087 | 0.0028 | 0.1101 | 0.0177 |
| Treatments | ||||
| Proportion (%) (FFS-PS: FFS-CIPM) |
G′ (Storage modulus) (Pa) |
G″ (Loss modulus) (Pa) |
tan δ (Tangent delta) |
|
| C30:70H | 0.004 ± 0.001 | 0.002 ± 0.0003 | 0.44 ± 0.05 | |
| HPMC | C50:50H | 0.020 ± 0.001 | 0.007 ± 0.0000 | 0.29 ± 0.01 |
| C70:30H | 0.070 ± 0.001 | 0.017 ± 0.0007 | 0.23 ± 0.01 | |
| C30:70Ch | 0.006 ± 0.002 | 0.003 ± 0.0002 | 0.54 ± 0.18 | |
| Chitosan | C50:50Ch | 0.008 ± 0.002 | 0.004 ± 0.0005 | 0.47 ± 0.05 |
| C70:30Ch | 0.089 ± 0.004 | 0.023 ± 0.0000 | 0.26 ± 0.01 | |
| C30:70S | 1.35 ± 0.057 | 0.155 ± 0.0071 | 0.12 ± 0.00 | |
| Starch | C50:50S | 0.880 ± 0.023 | 0.118 ± 0.0007 | 0.14 ± 0.01 |
| C70:30S | 0.750 ± 0.046 | 0.098 ± 0.0028 | 0.13 ± 0.00 | |
| Table of p-values | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| G’ (Pa) | G’’ (Pa) | tan δ | |
| Polysaccharide type (A) | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | 0.0001 |
| Proportion (B) | <0.0001 | 0.0002 | 0.0069 |
| AxB | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | 0.0703 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).