2. Core--Inverse
The purpose of this section is to investigate elementary properties of the core--inverse in a *-Banach algebra. Our starting points is the following.
Theorem 1.
Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
.
- (2)
and
- (3)
and
Proof. By hypothesis, and . Then and ; hence, . Since and , we see that . Since . This implies that and . Hence, .
Since
, we see that
Therefore
By hypothesis, . Set . As in the preceding discussion, and . Thus we see that Therefore , as required.
Let . Then By hypothesis, we have Since , we have , and then . This implies that . Hence, . As , we see that , and so . Hence . Therefore and , as asserted. □
We denote
in Theorem 2.1 by
, and call it the core-
-inverse of
a. As an immediate consequence, we prove that the core inverse
of
a can be characterized as its
-inverse, namely with
(see [
25]).
Corollary 1.
Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
.
- (2)
has Drazin inverse.
Proof. By hypothesis, has core inverse and Then has g-Drazin inverse. By virtue of Theorem 2.1,
Set
. Then
and
. Hence,
; and so
. We have
. Furthermore,
, and then
. This implies that
. Hence,
; hence,
. Therefore
; whence,
. We infer that
. On the other hand, we see that
. Therefore
has group inverse. Hence
and so
. Write
for a
. Then
, and so
a has core inverse
x. Therefore
, as asserted. □
Corollary 2.
Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
.
- (2)
and
Proof. ⟹ By virtue of Theorem 2.1, we have and Therefore we verify that
⟸ Set . Then and . Hence, ; and so . This implies that . Moreover, , and then . This implies that . We infer that ; hence, . Therefore . As , we have . Hence, . Thus . Since and ; hence, . As , we have ; hence, . Hence , and so .
Since , we have , and then . Thus, . We infer that . Hence, . On the other hand, and , and so . Thus .
Accordingly, by Theorem 2.1. □
Let be the ring of all complex matrices, with conjugate transpose as the involution.
Corollary 3.
Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
A has core--inverse.
- (2)
.
In this case,
Proof. In view of [
24],
A has
-inverse if and only if
. In this case,
On the other hand,
and
if and only if
. Therefore we complete the proof by Theorem 2.1. □
Corollary 4.
Let have a group inverse with full-rank factorization . Then
Proof. One directly verify that Clearly, . Since , we have . Hence, . This implies that . According to Theorem 2.1, A has -core inverse, as required. □
Recall that
y is the inverse of
a along an element
b if
(see [
19]). Evidently,
. We next consider when the core inverse of a ring element is its inverse along an element
b. This is just the case of the core-
-inverse.
Theorem 2.
Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
.
- (2)
and
- (3)
and
Proof. By virtue of Theorem 2.1,
and
Then
. Write
and
for some
. Then
Write
and
for some
. Then we have
Then . This implies that . Then we have Therefore and .
Let
. Then
. Write
and
for
. Then
and
. Hence,
. By virtue of [
32],
.
By using Theorem 2.1, . Then and . Write and for some . Furthermore, we check that
Since we have . Further, we see that . Hence, . Moreover, we see that . On the other hand, . Thus, . By virtue of Theorem 2.1, , as desired.
In view of Theorem 2.1,
and
By virtue of [
14], Theorem 2.13, we have
and
. Hence,
.
By hypothesis,
and
. In light of [
14],
. Moreover, we see that
and
. According to Theorem 2.1,
, as asserted. □
Corollary 5.
Let . If , then b is EP.
Proof. In view of Theorem 2.6,
and
Then
In light of [
30],
b is EP. □
We are ready to prove:
Theorem 3.
Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
.
- (2)
,
- (3)
,
- (4)
,
Proof. In view of Theorem 2.1,
and
. Set
. Then we verify that
In view of Theorem 2.1, we have
, and then
. Hence
. This implies that
Hence, we get
Therefore and .
Since , we have . Since , we see that . Thus, Therefore
On the other hand, , we have . Hence Since , we have Hence, Hence, This implies that Accordingly, we derive that as required.
By hypothesis, Then According to Theorem 2.1, .
Since , we see that . Thus, if and only if , as asserted. □
Corollary 6.
Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
.
- (2)
Proof. This is obvious by Theorem 2.1 and Theorem 2.6.
As , we have , and then . This completes the proof by Theorem 2.8. □
Corollary 7.
Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
.
- (2)
, .
Proof. In view of Theorem 2.8, and . By hypothesis, we have , and then . It is easy to verify that Then This implies that Therefore , as required.
By hypothesis, we have
. Hence
Hence,
Set
. Then we verify that
Write
for a
. Then we check that
We infer that
. Then
. This implies that
Thus, . Since has group inverse, we have . Hence . This completes the proof by Theorem 2.8. □
An element
a in
R is EP (i.e., an EP element) if there exists some
such that
. Evidently,
is EP if and only if
and
(see [
20,
31]).
Theorem 4.
Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
.
- (2)
is EP,
- (3)
is EP,
Proof. By virtue of [
14],
,
. Set
. Then
by [
14], Theorem 2.13. As
, we have
, and so
. This implies that
. Hence
. Clearly,
, and then
. Since
, we have
. This implies that
.
Since
, we have
. According to [
30], Theorem 3.6,
is EP.
By hypothesis,
is EP,
. Hence
. In view of [
14], Theorem 2.13,
and
. Set
. Then
, and so
. Furthermore, we verify that
Therefore and , as required.
By the argument above, . In view of Theorem 2.6, and then . Let . Then and for some . Hence . Thus , as desired.
Since
is EP, it has Drazin inverse. By using Cline’s formula,
has Drazin inverse. It is easy to verify that
Thus
. Moreover,
; hence,
. We infer that
. By virtue of [
14], Theorem 2.13,
and
. Set
. Then
. Hence,
. Since
and
we check that
Therefore , as required. □
Corollary 8.
Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
.
- (2)
is EP,
- (3)
is EP,
Proof. In view of Theorem 2.11, is EP, and Clearly, . Since , we see that . In light of Theorem 2.11, , and then . This implies that . Therefore , as required.
Let . Then and for some . Hence . Since , we can find such that . Then . Thus . Accordingly, by Theorem 2.11.
Similarly to the argument above, we obtain the result by Theorem 2.11. □
Corollary 9.
Let . Then is EP for any .
Proof. By the argument in Theorem 2.11, we have
for any
. Then
. In view of [
30], Theorem 3.6,
is EP. □