This study examines customer retention intention in neobanking environments using a theory-informed explainable machine learning framework. Existing digital banking research typically relies on linear modelling approaches to explain retention behaviour, potentially overlooking nonlinear, value-range-dependent, and interaction-based predictive patterns. Using a publicly available survey of 305 neobank users, this study compares regularized linear models, a partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM)-inspired benchmark, and XGBoost under repeated nested cross-validation. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP)-based explainability, SHAP interaction analysis, generalized additive model (GAM) diagnostics, construct-level aggregation, and construct-sensitivity checks are used to interpret model behaviour and assess robustness. The results show that XGBoost substantially outperforms the linear benchmarks, achieving the lowest average RMSE and highest average R² across 100 out-of-sample test-fold estimates. Trust-related indicators provide the largest share of model-based predictive importance, followed by perceived security and switching costs. SHAP and GAM diagnostics suggest that trust and switching costs may contribute to retention intention in heterogeneous and nonlinear ways, while perceived security displays a more stable positive predictive pattern. Age-related nonlinearities appear weak and should be interpreted cautiously given the young sample profile. The analysis also suggests possible non-additive relationships between trust and perceived security. The study contributes to digital banking and FinTech research by showing how explainable machine learning can complement theory-driven retention models, identify potentially nonlinear predictive patterns, and preserve interpretability. The findings offer practical insight for trust-building, visible security assurance, and retention diagnostics in neobanking contexts.