3.1. Cheese Classification
A framework which may be used in the classification of the various kinds of cheese based on the characteristics of the cheese is presented in the table below. A complete framework which may be used in the classification of the various kinds of cheese is obtained based on the results obtained above based on the three major characteristics. The complete framework which may be used in the classification of the various kinds of cheese based on the three major characteristics is presented in the table below. Physicochemical properties—the moisture content and fat content in dry matter (FDM) of the cheese determine the texture or firmness of the cheese. The moisture content and FDM of the cheese determine the kind of cheese. Cheeses with a moisture content > 67% are soft cheeses, and those with a moisture content < 49% are hard cheeses. The fat content in dry matter of the cheese differentiates cheeses having the same moisture content.
Raw material—The type of milk used for producing cheese is one of the critical factors for classification, as it influences nature and type of cheese. The traditional type of cheese, which is being produced in Kosova, is composed of goat milk, sheep milk, or cow milk. The second type of classification for cheese is based on the type of milk used as raw material for producing the cheese. There are different types of cheese that can be produced with cow milk, sheep milk, or goat milk, and each has different compositions. Sheep milk has high fat content and high protein content in comparison to cow milk and goat milk. The third classification of cheese is based on the procedure that is adopted during the ripening process. Fresh cheese is directly used after its production without following any procedure for ripening. Brined cheese is soaked in salt solution. The salt used for this purpose also affects the moisture content, microbes, and taste of the cheese. Ripened cheese is placed in a controlled atmosphere for a long time. This classification is adopted to differentiate between the types of cheese based on the procedure for ripening. The procedure for ripening is adopted either by soaking the cheese in salt solution or by placing it in a controlled atmosphere. This classification is in accordance with the international norms for dairy products that are adopted worldwide.
Table 1.
Classification of cheese types based on physicochemical, milk Source, and ripening characteristics.
Table 1.
Classification of cheese types based on physicochemical, milk Source, and ripening characteristics.
| Parameter |
Classification criteria |
Description/range |
| Moisture content |
Soft cheese |
>67% |
| |
Semi-soft cheese |
54–67% |
| |
Semi-hard cheese |
49–56% |
| |
Hard cheese |
<49% |
| Fat in dry matter (FDM) |
Low fat |
<45% |
| |
Medium fat |
45–60% |
| |
High fat |
>60% |
| Milk type |
Cow milk |
Cheese made from cow’s milk |
| |
Sheep milk |
Cheese made from sheep’s milk |
| |
Goat milk |
Cheese made from goat’s milk |
| Ripening |
Fresh cheese |
No ripening, consumed immediately |
| |
Brined cheese |
Ripened/stored in brine solution |
| |
Ripened cheese |
Aged for weeks to months under controlled conditions |
Table 2 presents a summary of descriptive statistics of moisture content (%) of the examined 117 cheese samples, categorized into four types of cheese: soft, semi-soft, semi-hard, and hard cheeses. The table includes the number of examined samples (n), average moisture content, standard deviation (SD), standard error (SE), minimum and maximum moisture content, and confidence intervals of each type of cheese. Moisture content is one of the major physicochemical properties that are used for classifying different types of cheese, considering its direct impact on the texture, shelf life, and ripening of cheese products, these findings supporting by authors [
23,
48,
67,
68,
69]. The results clearly demonstrate the differences in the moisture levels for each of the cheese categories. The results revealed that the soft cheese group had the highest average moisture content, i.e., 70.2% ± 2.5%, over a wide range of 67.0% to 74.5%. The low value of the SD of the soft cheese group indicated that the data of the soft cheese group varied moderately. The semi-soft cheese group had the second highest average moisture content, i.e., 60.5% ± 2.8%, over a wide range of 54.2% to 66.8%. The semi-hard cheese group had the least moisture content, i.e., 52.8% ± 2.1%. The hard cheese group had the least average moisture content, i.e., 45.7% ± 2.0%. The gradual decrease in the moisture content of the cheese types from soft cheese to hard cheese follows the international standardized system of classification of cheese types. This may be due to the technological variation in the process of making cheese, i.e., cutting and pressing the cheese and then ripening the cheese [
13,
23,
25,
27,
67,
70].
From the 95% confidence intervals presented in the table above, it is evident that the mean values obtained in the study are reliable and that there is minimal overlap between different types of cheese. For instance, the confidence interval for soft cheese is 69.2–71.2%, while that of semi-soft cheese is 59.5–61.5%, thus illustrating that different types of cheese have different compositions. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was employed to determine if the differences observed in the moisture content of different types of cheese were statistically significant. From the analysis, it was evident that the differences observed were statistically significant (
p < 0.001), thus illustrating that moisture content is indeed a discriminating factor for different types of cheese. Similar findings have been obtained in a few research studies on dairy products, where it is evident that moisture content is the main parameter that differentiates different types of cheese and their technology and perception, as is evident in this study [
13,
70,
71].
The results (
Table 3) obtained from the analysis of variance test, which was carried out to check if any variation exists in the moisture content of the different types of cheese included in this research, i.e., soft, semi-soft, semi-hard, and hard cheese, are presented in
Table 3. The ANOVA test has widely been used to check if any variation exists in the physicochemical parameters of different types of dairy products, including cheese, statistically supported by authors [
72,
73,
74,
75]. This is a clear indication that the sum of squares between the groups is significantly higher than the sum of squares within the groups, which in turn shows that 4380.7 is significantly higher than 1080.5, and therefore a larger proportion of the total variability in the data is explained by the variability in the data between the groups of a particular kind of cheese than the variability in the data within the groups and df between groups is 3, which is the number of types of cheese in the dataset, df within groups is 113.
In
Table 3, results since the calculated mean square for between groups are significantly higher, i.e., 1460.2, compared to the mean square within groups, which is 9.56, a very high F-statistic value of 152.6 is calculated, reflecting a high statistical separation among different types of cheese with respect to their moisture content. In addition, the results also indicate the significance of results through the
p-value which is less than 0.001. From the results, it is very clear that the significance of the criterion of moisture content, on which different types of cheese are differentiated, is validated. The results have validated the classification of different types of cheese based on moisture content, a common practice in dairy science. This is because it is a result of technological processes. Soft cheese has a high moisture content since it is processed at low pressure compared to the semi-hard and hard cheeses, which have a low moisture content because of technological processes. Highly significant results were obtained in the ANOVA test, which sustained the classification method used in this study and validated the assumption that the moisture content could be used as a valid criterion in the differentiation of the types of cheese in Kosovo. In fact, a similar statistical trend has been reported in other studies aimed at evaluating the compositional diversity of industrial cheese types, in which moisture content was always confirmed as one of the most relevant factors influencing cheese texture and shelf life [
17,
19,
23,
48,
72,
76,
77].
As presented in
Table 4, the correlation matrix of the important physicochemical properties of the cheese samples analyzed in Kosovo shows that there is a strong negative correlation between moisture content and fat content in the dry matter (r = −0.68,
p < 0.01). This shows that cheeses with higher moisture content tend to have lower fat content in the dry matter. A moderate negative correlation was obtained between moisture content and protein content (r = −0.45,
p < 0.05). This information shows that cheeses with higher moisture content tend to have lower protein content. Fat content in the dry matter was positively correlated with the protein content (r = 0.42,
p < 0.05). This information shows that cheeses with higher fat content tend to have higher protein content as they become older. Moreover, a minor negative correlation trend was obtained between salt concentration and moisture content (r = −0.31,
p < 0.05). This shows that cheeses with lower moisture content tend to have higher salt concentrations which is the standard procedure for their aging process. This analysis showed a strong negative correlation between moisture content and fat content in dry matter, which indicated that the lower the moisture content, the higher the fat content. From the statistical analysis, significant physicochemical differences were established between the categories of cheese in Kosovo. Significant variation was observed in the content of moisture from one type of cheese to another, which proved the importance of the parameter. Increase in the content of fat in the dry matter was observed along with the decrease in the content of moisture, which proved the impact of the processing conditions on the quality of the cheese. This proved the importance of the usage of physicochemical parameters in the systematic classification and standardization of the different types of cheese in Kosovo.
As indicated in
Table 5 below, the results can be established after the analysis is done on the correlation analysis of the different physicochemical parameters through the application of the principal component analysis (PCA) to determine the most significant factors influencing the variance of the cheese samples under investigation. From the results indicated in
Table 5 above, it can be established that the first three components explain 87.7% of the total variance. This shows that the variance is explained by the first three components. The first component explains 49.7% of the total variance. PC1 was also found to be highly correlated with moisture content (−0.82), fat in the dry matter (0.79), and protein content (0.71). This study shows that the first principal component is used for measuring the differences between high moisture content cheese varieties and high fat and protein concentration cheese varieties. The first principal component is also used for measuring the gradient between fresh/soft cheese varieties and aged cheese varieties. The second principal component was found to be 24.5% and PC2 was also found to be highly correlated with salt (0.69), pH (0.63), and ash (0.57). These three parameters are all linked to cheese processing and ripening. Therefore, the second principal component reflects the technological and ripening characteristics of cheese. The third principal component (PC3) accounted for a further 13.5% of the total variance. It showed moderate loadings for protein and pH. This principal component may be linked to secondary compositional variability in cheese samples.
Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was employed to identify major sources of variation in the cheese samples under investigation and the first three principal components explained 87.7% of the total variance, also this revealed that most of the variation in this data set was explained by these principal components. The first principal component explained 49.7% of the total variance and was related to moisture, fat in dry matter, and protein. This revealed that major sources of variation in cheese samples under investigation were differences in composition between fresh and ripened cheese. The second principal component (PC2) was related to salt content, ash, and pH and accounted for 24.5% of the total variance. This showed that the major contributors to variation in cheese samples were related to moisture and composition. This was in line with the study presented in the dairy science literature on the classification of cheese since its physicochemical composition.
3.3. Cluster Analysis
In this study, cheese samples were classified based on their physicochemical properties by employing hierarchical cluster analysis.
Table 7 shows the results of the cluster analysis carried out to classify 117 cheese samples based on their physicochemical characteristics. Four different clusters of cheese samples were established, and they could be classified into traditional types of cheese, such as soft, semi-soft, semi-hard, and hard cheese varieties. Cluster 1 consisted of 30 samples (25.6%), which belonged to a type of cheese known as soft cheese, characterized by high moisture content and low-fat content in dry matter. The second cluster included 35 samples (29.9%), which were related to semi-soft cheese. This type of cheese was characterized by moderate values of moisture content and fat content. The third cluster included 32 samples (27.4%), which were related to semi-hard cheese. This type of cheese was characterized by low moisture due to the presence of protein, which was a result of removing whey during the manufacturing process. The fourth cluster included 20 samples (17.1%), which were related to hard cheese. This type of cheese was characterized by low values of moisture content, along with high values of fat content and protein content, resulting from the long ripening process.
The results obtained from
Table 7 using cluster analysis showed a good correlation with the conventional classification of cheeses since moisture content and other compositional characteristics. The results obtained from this study confirm that the physicochemical characteristics can be a good basis for differentiation of various types of cheese and that the use of multivariate statistical methods can be a good approach in the standardization and characterization of cheeses from Kosovo. The results of the statistical analysis indicated that there are differences in the composition of various cheese categories in Kosovo. The moisture content was found to be the main factor that differentiated between cheese types, with fat content in dry matter and protein content also being significant factors in differentiation. The study also found that certain types of cheese exist, namely certain types of traditional cheese, i.e., soft cheese, semi-soft cheese, semi-hard cheese, and hard cheese, which can be used to establish a system for standardization of cheese types found in Kosovo.
Physicochemical properties of cheese samples from three different production systems are given in
Table 8. The moisture and protein content were found to be maximum in the cheese samples from the traditional production system. The fat and salt content were found to be slightly higher in the cheese samples from the traditional production system compared to the cheese samples from small dairy production systems and industrial dairy production systems. This may be due to the non-standardized method of cheese production. The method of cheese production is not standardized in the traditional production system. The curds are not pressed during cheese production.
Table 8 below is a table showing various physicochemical properties of various cheese samples obtained from various production systems. The results obtained from the table below indicate that various production systems are very important in the influence of various compositions. It was observed that the various traditional household production systems had the highest value for moisture content (59.8%), fat content (27.2%), and protein content (20.3%) in the cheese obtained. This was achieved in the cheese because of various conditions that were applied during processing of the cheese. Various conditions that were applied during processing of the cheese included handling of the curd, pressing of the curd, and draining of the whey. The salt content and pH values increased progressively from soft to hard cheeses. The results have proved that physicochemical properties can efficiently cluster cheeses based on traditional classification systems. The properties can be applied in the standardization and quality certification of cheeses. Clustering has been applied in various studies that were undertaken across the world for classifying the cheeses based on various factors such as moisture content, fat content, protein content, and pH [
23,
59,
80,
81].