Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Use of Intravenous Lidocaine, Magnesium and Ketamine and Acute Pain After Lung Resection Surgery: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study

A peer-reviewed version of this preprint was published in:
Journal of Clinical Medicine 2026, 15(13), 5295. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15135295

Submitted:

14 May 2026

Posted:

15 May 2026

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Background: Thoracic surgery is associated with severe post-operative pain caused by chest wall manipulation and intercostal nerve injury. Multimodal analgesia with non-opioid agents such as lidocaine, ketamine and magnesium might be beneficial for pain control and reduce opioid consumption. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, we recruited 118 consecutive patients who underwent lung resection via thoracotomy from January 2019 to January 2021 at Hospital Universitari de Girona Doctor Josep Trueta. The primary outcome was total intravenous morphine consumption within the first 24 h post-operatively. Multi-variable linear regression modelling was used to determine the adjusted association between lidocaine, ketamine and magnesium administration and morphine consumption in the first 24 h after surgery. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon’s rank-sum and Fisher’s exact tests. Results: In total, 71 patients received lidocaine, ketamine and magnesium intraoperatively (LKM) and 47 patients did not receive this regimen (non-LKM group). The LKM group had a higher prevalence of hypertension and higher proportions of patients undergoing lobectomy and pneumonectomy. Morphine consumption within 24 h post-operatively was lower in the LKM group than in the non-LKM group (median [interquartile range], 2 [2–6] mg vs. 5 [3–8] mg; p = 0.001). No drug-related adverse events were observed. After multi-variable risk adjustment, lidocaine, ketamine and magnesium use was associated with significantly decreased total intravenous morphine consumption within 24 h post-operatively (−1.76, 95% confidence interval = −3.40 to −0.12, p = 0.03). Conclusions: Lidocaine, ketamine and magnesium use was associated with lower 24-h morphine consumption in our prospective cohort.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

Introduction

Despite its wide use, lung resection remains associated with substantial post-operative morbidity. Despite advances in peri-operative care, patients undergoing thoracic surgery frequently experience significant post-operative pain, which negatively affects recovery and potentially contributes to respiratory complications, prolonged hospitalisation and delayed functional rehabilitation [1,2,3]. These challenges highlight the clinical importance of optimising peri-operative management strategies to improve outcomes following pulmonary resection.
Thoracic surgery is among the most painful surgical procedures, as it involves extensive manipulation of the ribs, muscles and intercostal nerves [1,3]. Pulmonary resection often provokes severe nociceptive and neuropathic responses related to mechanical rib manipulation, intercostal nerve trauma and pleural inflammation [1,3]. Inadequate or insufficient analgesia can impair respiratory mechanics, increasing the risk of hypoventilation, atelectasis, pneumonia, cardiovascular complications and progression to chronic post-operative pain [1,2]. Although thoracic epidural or paravertebral block is considered the gold standard for thoracic analgesia, these techniques are not without risks [2,3]. Consequently, opioids remain widely used in the post-operative setting; however, concerns regarding opioid-related adverse effects, including respiratory depression, gastrointestinal dysfunction, urinary retention and immunosuppression, have increased [2,3].
Because of this complex pathophysiology, multimodal analgesic strategies incorporating multiple analgesics, which aim to reduce opioid requirements and associated adverse effects, have gained importance [2,3]. Data suggest that the use of lidocaine alone is not associated with a decrease in morphine consumption in thoracic surgery [4]. However, there is data suggesting a benefit, in terms of decreasing morphine consumption, from using magnesium alone [5] or ketamine alone in thoracic surgery [6]. A combination of either ketamine plus magnesium or lidocaine plus magnesium has been successfully used [7,8]. From a clinical perspective, the complementary mechanisms of lidocaine, ketamine, and magnesium led us to hypothesize that their combined perioperative administration could improve postoperative pain control and reduce opioid requirements in patients undergoing thoracic surgery. Therefore, this study evaluated the impact of intraoperative intravenous lidocaine, ketamine, and magnesium administration on acute postoperative pain intensity and opioid consumption following pulmonary resection and assessed the safety of this combined multimodal approach.

Materials and Methods

This prospective observational cohort study included adults (≥18 years) undergoing elective lung resection via thoracotomy between January 2019 and January 2021 at Hospital Universitari de Girona Doctor Josep Trueta. All thoracotomies were included. The study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the protocol was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee. Each patient provided written informed consent. Patients underwent general anesthesia according to a standardized protocol.Anesthesia was induced with fentanyl 2 μg/kg, rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg, and propofol 2 mg/kg. Airway management was achieved using either a double-lumen endotracheal tube or a bronchial blocker, selected according to patient characteristics and anesthesiologist preference. Dexamethasone 0.1 mg/kg, acetaminophen 1gr and dexketoprofen 50mg were given before surgical incision. Paravertebral catheter was inserted by surgeons by direct visualization at T4-T5. Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane (end-tidal concentration 1.5–2.5%) targeting a bispectral index (BIS) of 40–60, with supplemental fentanyl boluses (1–1.5 μg/kg) administered as required. At the end of surgery, 20ml of a combination of 10ml of mepivacaine 2% plus 10ml of bupivacaine 0,25% were administered through the paravertebral catheter. Patients were transferred to the intensive care unit for postoperative monitoring and recovery. The cohort was divided into two groups based on the intra-operative receipt of lidocaine, ketamine and magnesium (LKM and non-LKM groups). Patients in the LKM group received an intravenous bolus of lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg, followed by a 1.5 mg/kg/h infusion until the end of surgery. Magnesium sulfate 1.5 g and ketamine 0.3 mg/kg were delivered via intravenous bolus before surgical incision. All patients were managed post-operatively with a standardised multimodal analgesic regimen including paravertebral infusion of bupivacaine 0.25% at fix rate of 10ml/h, acetaminophen and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Outcomes

The primary outcome was the total intravenous morphine consumption within the first 24 h post-operatively. The secondary outcomes were pain intensity at 3 and 24 h post-operatively, as assessed using a 10-point visual analogue scale (VAS), and the prevalence of chronic pain at 3 months defined as patient-reported pain with a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score >3. Safety outcomes, including signs of local anaesthetic systemic toxicity and bradycardia, were also recorded.

Statistical Analysis

All analyses were performed using STATA version 13.1 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). Statistical significance was defined by a two-sided P-value less than 0.05. The Shapiro–Wilk test was used to determine whether variables were normally distributed. Continuous variables were reported as medians with interquartile ranges (IQRs) and compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Categorical variables were analysed using Fisher’s exact test.
The adjusted association between LKM use and post-operative outcomes of interest was then estimated using multi-variable linear regression models that included age and sex as covariates. Results were expressed as adjusted coefficients or odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

The cohort included 118 consecutive patients who underwent pulmonary resection, including 71 patients (60%) in the LKM group and 47 patients (40%) in the non-LKM group. Patients in the LKM group had a higher prevalence of hypertension and higher rates of lobectomy and pneumonectomy, whereas the non-LKM group had a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus. However, these differences were not statistically significant. Conversely, median age was comparable between the groups (67 [60–73] years in the LKM group vs. 65 [60–73] years in the non-LKM group; p = 0.51), as was the proportion of female patients (31% vs. 34%; p = 0.12). No significant differences were found in body mass index, ASA, or pulmonary function (Table 1).
Outcomes

Primary Outcome

In unadjusted analyses, morphine consumption within the first 24 h post-operatively was significantly lower in the LKM group than in the non-LKM group (median [IQR], 2 [0–6] mg vs. 5 [3–8] mg; p = 0.001; Table 2 and Table 3). In multi-variable linear regression analyses, intra-operative LKM use was also associated with a significant decrease in morphine consumption within the first 24 h post-operatively (−1.76 [95% CI = −3.40 to −0.12], p = 0.03; Table 4).

Secondary Outcomes

In unadjusted analyses, the LKM group had a significantly lower VAS score than the non-LKM group at both 3 (3 [2–5] vs. 5 [3–5]; p = 0.006) and 24 h (2 [0–3] vs. 4 [1–4]; p = 0.0004; Table 2). Furthermore, the prevalence of chronic pain at 3 months tended to be lower in the LKM group. However, this difference was not significant in unadjusted analyses (OR = 0.55; 95% CI = 0.15–2.04; p = 0.37; Table 3) or adjusted analyses (OR = 0.49; 95% CI = 0.13–1.87; p = 0.30; Table 4). No significant differences in peri-operative complications were observed between groups, and no drug-related adverse effects were reported (Table 2).

Discussion

In our prospective observational study, the intra-operative administration of intravenous LKM sulfate was associated with a significant reduction in morphine consumption within the first 24 h post-operatively. In addition, post-operative pain scores (VAS) at 3 and 24 h were significantly decreased. However, this analgesic benefit was not associated with a significant reduction in chronic pain at 3 months. Importantly, no adverse events were observed, suggesting that this combined multimodal approach was well tolerated. Our findings are inconsistent with prior evidence on the individual components of multimodal analgesia in thoracic surgery. Data from a recent meta-analysis in thoracic surgery (9 trials, 672 patients) concluded that intravenous lidocaine showed no reduction in postoperative morphine consumption at 24 or 48 hours, despite reducing intraoperative remifentanil requirements. However, lidocaine did consistently reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting4. Similarly, data from two RCTs found no difference in postoperative opioid consumption, pain scores, or quality of recovery between lidocaine and placebo groups [9,10]. However, a recent RCT from 2025 trial of 160 thoracoscopic lung surgery patients found lidocaine-based PCIA (1.5 mg/kg/hr) produced significantly lower pain scores at rest and during coughing at 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively compared to sufentanil-based PCIA, with higher quality of recovery scores and faster return of bowel function [11]. Intravenous lidocaine has shown anti-inflammatory properties in thoracic surgical populations [12]. Ketamine, has several mechanisms of analgesic effect, including (a) spinal cord effects by blocking of NMDA receptors in dorsal horn neurons, which reduces secondary hyperalgesia and the “wind-up” phenomenon, (b) prevention of central sensitization by inhibition of NMDA receptor-mediated nociceptive processing, (c) reduction of opioid-induced hyperalgesia by interaction with opioid receptors to counteract opioid tolerance mechanisms, (d) activation of descending inhibitory pathways by enhancement of monoaminergic pain modulation systems [13]. Data from an RCT on 70 thoracotomy patients showed that the use of ketamine was associated with less morphine consumption at 24h and less pain at rest at 48 h [14]. Furthermore, a recent meta-analysis of 9 RCTs (n=556) found that ketamine plus morphine significantly reduced opioid consumption compared with morphine alone (standardized mean difference: -2.75, 95% CI: -4.14 to -1.36, p=0.0001) during postoperative days 1-3. The ketamine group also experienced significantly lower pain scores at rest (SMD -0.60, 95% CI -0.83 to -0.37) and with movement/cough (SMD -0.73, 95% CI -1.27 to -0.18) in the first postoperative days6. Furthermore, a 2018 Cochrane review of 130 studies (8,341 patients across multiple surgery types, including thoracotomy) found perioperative IV ketamine reduced 24-hour opioid consumption by 8 mg morphine equivalents (19% reduction from 42 mg with placebo) and 48-hour consumption by 13 mg (19% reduction from 67 mg) [15]. Magnesium acts as an NMDA receptor antagonist and calcium channel blocker, reducing central sensitization to pain. The safety profile is favorable, with minimal side effects beyond occasional hypotension or mild sedation, and no significant respiratory depression in patients with normal renal function. Magnesium sulfate, through NMDA receptor modulation, has also exerted analgesic and opioid-sparing effects when used perioperatively in thoracotomy for lung resection [5,16] and general surgery [17,18,19]. Furthermore, there is data suggesting a synergistic effect between lidocaine and magnesium [7]. Another RCT on 63 patients undergoing abdominoplasty also showed that the use of ketamine + magnesium was associated with almost 50% higher decrease in morphine consumption during the first 12 h after surgery, compared to ketamine alone or control [8]. In clinical terms, these agents act on different components of nociceptive processing and central sensitization, which could explain their potential benefits when combined within a multimodal approach. Taken together, these findings suggest that targeting multiple pathways involved in nociceptive transmission and central sensitization may have contributed to the results of our prospective cohort study on thoracic surgery.
In terms of the role of these drugs in preventing chronic pain after thoracotomy, the evidence is mixed. Regarding ketamine, a 2017 systematic review concluded that while ketamine clearly benefits acute post-thoracotomy pain, the majority of randomized trials showed no role for ketamine in preventing chronic post-thoracotomy pain syndrome at variable follow-up lengths [20]. The thoracotomy-specific meta-analysis found no data to assess long-term effects on chronic pain [6]. However, a 2023 meta-analysis found ketamine reduced chronic postsurgical pain at 3-6 months (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.72-0.94) [21], and a 2024 meta-analysis showed ketamine may reduce chronic postsurgical neuropathic pain at 3 months (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.62-0.99) [13]. Regarding the use of lidocaine, data from a recent RCT of 64 patients undergoing thoracoscopic radical pneumonectomy showed that perioperative lidocaine infusion significantly reduced the incidence of chronic pain at 3 months (20.7% vs 46.4%, p < 0.05). However, this benefit did not persist at 6 months, with no significant difference between groups [22]. A RCT from a 2024 trial of 52 patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) with lidocaine showed no significant differences between groups in terms of long-term chronic pain outcomes at 14, 90, and 180 days [10]. Regarding the use of magnesium for preventing chronic pain after thoracic surgery, the evidence is limited. Data from a 2019 prospective observational study of 100 thoracotomy patients observed that the use of magnesium (40 mg/kg bolus over 10 minutes at induction, followed by 10 mg/kg/hr infusion for 24 hours) was associated with a decrease in neurophatic pain at 30 days (2.1% vs 14.3%, p=0.031) and at 90 days (0% vs 12.2%) [5].
However, in our study, the prevalence of chronic pain at 3 months did not significantly differ between groups. Although intravenous lidocaine is known to modulate inflammatory responses, this mechanism alone may be insufficient to prevent the development of chronic pain, particularly in complex surgical settings such as thoracic surgery. The relationship between inflammation and chronic pain appears to be non-linear, and excessive suppression of inflammatory pathways may interfere with physiological processes involved in pain resolution [23].
Moreover, chronic postsurgical pain is unlikely to be driven exclusively by central sensitization. As highlighted by Bonezzi et al., chronic pain should be considered a multifactorial condition, not solely dependent on time or central nervous system changes, but also influenced by persistent peripheral inputs, underlying disease, and maladaptive responses developing over time [24].
The originality of our study lies in its simultaneous evaluation of LKM sulfate administered intraoperatively as part of a standardised multimodal analgesic protocol. Although previous studies suggested synergistic effects between two agents [7], none evaluated the combined use of all three drugs in the context of thoracotomy. To our knowledge, this is the first study to analyze the combined perioperative effect of these factors in this surgical population.
Compared with previous studies [14], ketamine dosing in our protocol was similar, and the addition of lidocaine and magnesium might have enhanced the analgesic effect without increasing adverse events. Although hypotension was reported by Mendonca et al. [7] when lidocaine and magnesium were combined, no such complications were observed in our prospective cohort, possibly because the drugs were administered slowly and near the time of surgical incision. No adverse effects were observed in our prospective cohort, consistent with previously reported safety data [17,25].
The strengths of this study included its prospective design, pragmatic real-world thoracic surgery population and detailed peri-operative data collection. In addition, the use of objective outcomes to assess acute post-operative pain and the application of regression modeling to adjust for baseline differences strengthen the validity of our findings. However, several limitations should be acknowledged. First, baseline differences between groups were present, although these were addressed using regression modeling. Second, as with most observational studies, residual unmeasured confounding could not be excluded. Third, specific adverse effects, such as ketamine-related hallucinations, were not systematically captured. Fourth, this was a single-center study, which might limit external validity. Finally, the sample size for long-term outcomes was limited, potentially affecting the ability to detect differences in chronic pain at 3 months.
Further randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings. Future research should aim to define optimal dosing strategies and explore mechanistic biomarkers of inflammation and neuronal excitability through which these agents might act synergistically. These insights could help identify patient subgroups most likely to benefit from this approach, such as older patients or those with impaired pulmonary function. The integration of this multimodal drug combination into enhanced recovery after surgery pathways might offer a safe and opioid-sparing strategy for thoracic surgery.
Regarding the use of lidocaine, it should be stated that the International consensus guidelines classify intravenous lidocaine as a “high-risk” medicine requiring hospital medication governance approval and informed patient consent. The recommended dosing is no more than 1.5 mg/kg as a bolus (over 10 minutes based on ideal body weight), followed by an infusion of no more than 1.5 mg/kg/hr for up to 24 hours, which is the dose used in our study. Lidocaine should not be used concurrently with other local anesthetic interventions, including avoiding nerve blocks within 4 hours of starting or stopping lidocaine infusion [25].
In conclusion, the intra-operative administration of LKM sulfate was associated with a significant reduction in morphine consumption within the first 24 h after thoracotomy for lung resection in our single-center prospective cohort. These findings support the potential role of this combination as part of a multimodal analgesic strategy in thoracic surgery.

Funding

No funding to be declared.

References

  1. Pogatzki-Zahn, E.M.; Segelcke, D.; Schug, S.A. Postoperative pain-from mechanisms to treatment. Pain Rep. 2017, 2, e588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chou, R.; Gordon, D.B.; de Leon-Casasola, O.A.; Rosenberg, J.M.; Bickler, S.; Brennan, T.; Carter, T.; Cassidy, C.L.; Chittenden, E.H.; Degenhardt, E.; Griffith, S.; Manworren, R.; McCarberg, B.; Montgomery, R.; Murphy, J.; Perkal, M.F.; Suresh, S.; Sluka, K.; Strassels, S.; Thirlby, R.; Viscusi, E.; Walco, G.A.; Warner, L.; Weisman, S.J.; Wu, C.L. Management of Postoperative Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American Pain Society, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists’ Committee on Regional Anesthesia, Executive Committee, and Administrative Council. J. Pain 2016, 17, 131–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wu, C.L.; Raja, S.N. Treatment of acute postoperative pain. Lancet 2011, 377, 2215–2225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mamun, M.A.; Saleem, Y.; El-Tahlawy, Y.; Mahmood, W.U.; Lubbad, O.; Kabir, T. Intravenous Lidocaine in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ghezel-Ahmadi, V.; Ghezel-Ahmadi, D.; Schirren, J.; Tsapopiorgas, C.; Beck, G.; Bolukbas, S. Perioperative systemic magnesium sulphate to minimize acute and chronic post-thoracotomy pain: a prospective observational study. J. Thorac. Dis. 2019, 11, 418–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Zhaksylyk, A.; Abdildin, Y.G.; Sultangazin, S.; Zhumakanova, A.; Viderman, D. The impact of ketamine on pain-related outcomes after thoracotomy: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Front Med. 2024, 11, 1394219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mendonca, F.T.; Pellizzaro, D.; Grossi, B.J.; Calvano, L.A.; de Carvalho, L.S.F. Sposito AC: Synergistic effect of the association between lidocaine and magnesium sulfate on peri-operative pain after mastectomy: A randomised, double-blind trial. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol. 2020, 37, 224–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Varas, V.; Bertinelli, P.; Carrasco, P.; Souper, N.; Alvarez, P.; Danilla, S.; Egana, J.I.; Penna, A.; Sepulveda, S.; Arancibia, V.; Alvarez, M.G. Vergara R: Intraoperative Ketamine and Magnesium Therapy to Control Postoperative Pain After Abdominoplasty and/or Liposuction: A Clinical Randomized Trial. J. Pain Res. 2020, 13, 2937–2946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yao, Y.; Jiang, J.; Lin, W.; Yu, Y.; Guo, Y.; Zheng, X. Efficacy of systemic lidocaine on postoperative quality of recovery and analgesia after video-assisted thoracic surgery: A randomized controlled trial. J. Clin. Anesth. 2021, 71, 110223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Hojski, A.; Bolliger, D.; Mallaev, M.; Dackam, S.; Tsvetkov, N.; Wiese, M.; Schneider, T.; Lampart, A.; Lardinois, D. Perioperative intravenous lidocaine in thoracoscopic surgery for improved postoperative pain control: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, superiority trial. J. Thorac. Dis. 2024, 16, 1923–1932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tian, B.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, W.; Liu, R.; Qu, S.; Zhang, Z.; Yan, W. Lidocaine-Based vs Sufentanil-Based PCIA After Pulmonary Resection Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Drug Des. Devel Ther. 2025, 19, 8541–8553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hou, Y.H.; Shi, W.C.; Cai, S.; Liu, H.; Zheng, Z.; Qi, F.W.; Li, C.; Feng, X.M.; Peng, K.; Ji, F.H. Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine on Serum Interleukin-17 After Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Drug Des. Devel Ther. 2021, 15, 3379–3390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Abouarab, A.H.; Brulle, R.; Aboukilila, M.Y.; Weibel, S.; Schnabel, A. Efficacy and safety of perioperative ketamine for the prevention of chronic postsurgical pain: A meta-analysis. Pain Pract. 2024, 24, 553–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chumbley, G.M.; Thompson, L.; Swatman, J.E.; Urch, C. Ketamine infusion for 96 hr after thoracotomy: Effects on acute and persistent pain. Eur. J. Pain 2019, 23, 985–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Brinck, E.C.; Tiippana, E.; Heesen, M.; Bell, R.F.; Straube, S.; Moore, R.A.; Kontinen, V. Perioperative intravenous ketamine for acute postoperative pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2018, 12, CD012033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Salah Abdelgalil, A.; Shoukry, A.A.; Kamel, M.A.; Heikal, A.M.Y.; Ahmed, N.A. Analgesic Potentials of Preoperative Oral Pregabalin, Intravenous Magnesium Sulfate, and their Combination in Acute Postthoracotomy Pain. Clin. J. Pain 2019, 35, 247–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. De Oliveira, G.S., Jr.; Castro-Alves, L.J.; Khan, J.H.; McCarthy, R.J. Perioperative systemic magnesium to minimize postoperative pain: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesthesiology 2013, 119, 178–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Albrecht, E.; Kirkham, K.R.; Liu, S.S.; Brull, R. Peri-operative intravenous administration of magnesium sulphate and postoperative pain: a meta-analysis. Anaesthesia 2013, 68, 79–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Ng, K.T.; Yap, J.L.L.; Izham, I.N.; Teoh, W.Y.; Kwok, P.E.; Koh, W.J. The effect of intravenous magnesium on postoperative morphine consumption in noncardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol. 2020, 37, 212–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Moyse, D.W.; Kaye, A.D.; Diaz, J.H.; Qadri, M.Y.; Lindsay, D.; Pyati, S. Perioperative Ketamine Administration for Thoracotomy Pain. Pain Physician 2017, 20, 173–184. [Google Scholar]
  21. Sun, W.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, J.; Fu, Y.; Fan, J.; Cui, Y.; Wu, Y.; Wang, L.; Yu, Y.; Han, R. Effects of Ketamine on Chronic Postsurgical Pain in Patients Undergoing Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Pain Physician 2023, 26, E111–E122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Lu, Y.; Ding, H.; Shao, C.; Wang, N.; Shi, J.; Lian, C.; Wu, J.; Shangguan, W. Effect of lidocaine perioperative infusion on chronic postsurgical pain in patients undergoing thoracoscopic radical pneumonectomy. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022, 22, 255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Parisien, M.; Lima, L.V.; Dagostino, C.; El-Hachem, N.; Drury, G.L.; Grant, A.V.; Huising, J.; Verma, V.; Meloto, C.B.; Silva, J.R.; Dutra, G.G.S.; Markova, T.; Dang, H.; Tessier, P.A.; Slade, G.D.; Nackley, A.G.; Ghasemlou, N.; Mogil, J.S.; Allegri, M.; Diatchenko, L. Acute inflammatory response via neutrophil activation protects against the development of chronic pain. Sci. Transl. Med. 2022, 14, eabj9954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Bonezzi, C.; Demartini, L. Buonocore M: Chronic pain: not only a matter of time. Minerva Anestesiol. 2012, 78, 704–711. [Google Scholar]
  25. Foo, I.; Macfarlane, A.J.R.; Srivastava, D.; Bhaskar, A.; Barker, H.; Knaggs, R.; Eipe, N.; Smith, A.F. The use of intravenous lidocaine for postoperative pain and recovery: international consensus statement on efficacy and safety. Anaesthesia 2021, 76, 238–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 2. Post-operative outcomes.
Table 2. Post-operative outcomes.
LKM group (n = 71) Non-LKM group (n = 47) p
Morphine consumption within 24 h (median [IQR]), mg 2 [0–6] 5 [3–8] 0.001
VAS score at 3 h (median [IQR]) 3 [2–5] 5 [3–5] 0.06
VAS score at 24 h (median [IQR]) 2 [0–3] 4 [1–4] 0.0004
New post-operative atrial fibrillation, n (%) 1 (1.4%) 3 (6.3%) 0.17
Re-intervention for bleeding, n (%) 2 (2.8%) 0 (0%) 0.36
Signs of local anaesthetic systemic toxicity, n (%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1
Bradycardia, n (%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1
Length of ICU stay, (mean ± SD,) days 0.95 ± 0.20 1 ± 0.20 0.14
Length of hospital stay (median [IQR]), days 5 [4–5] 5 [3–6] 0.84
In-hospital mortality, n (%) 1 (1.4%) 1 (2.13%) 1
Thirty-day mortality, n (%) 1 (1.4%) 3 (6.3%) 0.14
Chronic pain at 3 months, n (%) 5 (7.14%) 5 (12.2%) 0.43
Three-month mortality, n (%) 2 (2.8%) 6 (12.7%) 0.05
Table 3. Unadjusted linear and logistic regression analyses for post-operative outcomes.
Table 3. Unadjusted linear and logistic regression analyses for post-operative outcomes.
LKM g70. Non-LKM group (n = 41) p
Morphine consumption within 24 h post-operatively, coefficient (95% CI) −1.84 (−3.49 to −0.19) ref 0.02
Chronic pain at 3 months, OR (95% CI) 0.55 (0.15–2.04) ref 0.37
Table 4. Adjusted linear and logistic regression analyses for post-operative outcomes.
Table 4. Adjusted linear and logistic regression analyses for post-operative outcomes.
LKM group (n = 70) Non-LKM group (n = 41) p
Morphine consumption within 24 h post-operatively, coefficient (95% CI) −1.76 (−3.40 to −0.12) ref 0.03
Chronic pain at 3 months, OR (95% CI) 0.49 (0.13–1.87) ref 0.30
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated

Accessibility

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings