Submitted:
06 May 2026
Posted:
07 May 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
1.1. Idea
- A complexity-reduced NOMP based on residual energy stopping criterion for OFDM channel estimation.
- Performance analysis of Oversampled OMP and NOMP, and the impact of Least-Squares on the performance of NOMP.
- A complexity-performance analysis demonstrating significant runtime reduction with negligible impact on estimation accuracy.
2. System Model
2.1. Compressed Sensing
- Restricted Isometry Property (RIP) – the sensing matrix should satisfy RIP to guarantee stable recovery of s-sparse channel h.
- Sufficient number of pilot measurements – the number of observations must scale appropriately with the sparsity level to enable reliable reconstruction.
2.1.1. Oversampled OMP
- Construct the oversampled sensing matrix where denotes the truncated DFT matrix and represents the oversampling (interpolation) operator.
- Use OMP algorithm on oversampled sensing matrix for sparse detection. A sinc-shaped oversampling filter is used at this stage to provide the best possible path-discrimination properties in the upsampled signal.
- The estimated impulse response is reconstructed using a shaping filter followed by a fast Fourier transform to transform it back to the frequency domain for equaliser parameter adjustment.
2.1.2. NOMP Algorithm
- Single Refinement: this emulates the search over the continuum by locally refining the estimate of obtained by picking the maximum over the discrete set .
- Newton refinement: this is the step that makes NOMP unique from OMP. It provides feedback for local refinements of previously detected sinusoids. It is crucial for fast convergence and high estimation accuracy [5].
- Least-Squares Update: this minimizes the residual energy as much as possible by updating the gains by projecting the received signal y onto the subspace spanned by the estimated frequencies.
| Algorithm 1: Newtonized Orthogonal Matching Pursuit (NOMP) |
![]() |
2.2. Overview of Proposed Low Complexity NOMP
- To develop, analyse and evaluate a reduced complexity NOMP variant.
- To analyse and evaluate the proposed variant, demonstrating that it achieves comparable or improved channel estimation with lower computational cost compared to classical NOMP across the given range of SNR.
- We obtain a coarse estimate of just an in [5].
- Single refinement. This emulates the search over the continuum by locally refining the estimate obtained if only the residual energy is decreased.
- Partial Cyclic refinement. This is the feedback stage, and where NOMP varies from other forward greedy methods [5]. We use partial cyclic refinement because it has very little impact on NOMP’s performance. Not all atoms are recycled in every cycle; only a subset is refined and updated. Note that this step also accepts updates.
- Update by approximate Least squares. From the evaluation of the impact of the least square update step in NOMP, we use approximate least squares, which performs one sweep per atom and further reduces the complexity without harm to the performance, as will be seen in the results.
| Algorithm 2: Energy-Based NOMP |
![]() |
2.2.1. Stopping Criterion
2.2.2. Complexity Analysis
| Metric | Detect | Refine One | Refine All | LS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complexity (O-Notation) | ||||
| OFDM-NOMP | ||||
| Classical NOMP | ||||
3. Simulation Results
3.1. System Parameters
3.2. Comparison of Performances
3.2.1. Analysis Performance of NOMP and Oversampled OMP
3.2.2. Analysis of the Impact of Least Squares
3.2.3. Proposed Low Complexity NOMP Performance
3.2.4. Numerical Computational Complexity
4. Conclusion
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Use of Artificial Intelligence
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| CFAR | Constant false alarm rate |
| CPU | Central Processing Unit |
| CS | Compressive Sensing |
| DFT | Discrete Fourier Transform |
| LS | Least Square |
| NOMP | Newtonised Orthogonal Matching Pursuit |
| OMP | Orthogonal Matching Pursuit |
| OFDM | Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing |
| QPSK | Quadrature Phase Shift Keying |
| RIP | Restricted Isometry Property |
| SER | Signal Error Rate |
| SNR | Signal to Noise Ratio |
References
- Marchese, M.; Tagliaferri, D.; Wymeersch, H.; Keskin, M. F.; Viterbo, E.; Savazzi, P. Beyond Legacy OFDM: A Mobility-Adaptive Multi-Gear Framework for 6G. arXiv 2026, arXiv:2603.29721. [Google Scholar]
- Li, B.; Zheng, Q.; Tian, X.; Yang, M.; Gui, G.; Jiang, W.; Lei, H.; Jiang, J.; Shu, F.; Elhanashi, A.; et al. The title of the cited article. Artif. Intell. Rev. 2025, 58(6), 1–35. [Google Scholar]
- Tropp, J. A.; Gilbert, A. C. Signal recovery from random measurements via orthogonal matching pursuit. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2007, 53(12), 4655–4666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chi, Y.; Pezeshki, A.; Scharf, L.; Calderbank, R. Sensitivity to basis mismatch in compressed sensing. In Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Dallas, TX, USA, 14–19 March 2010; pp. 3930–3933. [Google Scholar]
- Mamandipoor, B.; Ramasamy, D.; Madhow, U. Newtonized orthogonal matching pursuit: Frequency estimation over the continuum. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 2016, 64(19), 5066–5081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kucharczyk, M.; Dziwoki, G.; Izydorczyk, J.; Sułek, W.; Dustor, A.; Filipowski, W.; Izydorczyk, W.; Kłosowski, P.; Zawadzki, P.; Sowa, P.; Rajzer, M. Equalizer Parameters’ Adjustment Based on an Oversampled Channel Model for OFDM Modulation Systems. Electronics 2024, 13(5), 843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gui, G.; Wan, Q.; Peng, W.; Adachi, F. Sparse multipath channel estimation using compressive sampling matching pursuit algorithm. arXiv 2010, arXiv:1005.2270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, J.; Han, L.; Blum, R. S.; Xu, Z. Multi-snapshot Newtonized orthogonal matching pursuit for line spectrum estimation with multiple measurement vectors. Signal Process. 2019, 165, 175–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, L.-H.; Wu, J.-Y. An improved RIP-based performance guarantee for sparse signal recovery via orthogonal matching pursuit. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2014, 60(9), 5702–5715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, K.; Ruan, C.-C.; Sun, X.-H. On the convergence of a randomized block coordinate descent algorithm for a matrix least squares problem. Appl. Math. Lett. 2022, 124, 107689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lyu, H. Convergence of block coordinate descent with diminishing radius for nonconvex optimization. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2012.03503. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, H.; Zhang, J.; Jiang, J. Low Complexity Hybrid-Field Channel Estimation Based on Simultaneous Weighted OMP Algorithm in Extreme Large-Scale MIMO Systems. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 46551–46561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barron, A. R.; Cohen, A.; Dahmen, W.; DeVore, R. A. Approximation and learning by greedy algorithms. Ann. Stat. 2008, 36(1). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dziwoki, G.; Izydorczyk, J. Stopping Criteria Analysis of the OMP Algorithm for Sparse Channels Estimation. In Computer Networks; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 250–259. [Google Scholar]
- Cai, T. T.; Wang, L. Orthogonal Matching Pursuit for Sparse Signal Recovery With Noise. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2011, 57(7), 4680–4688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, J.; Guo, H.; Zhang, N.; Song, C.; Xu, Z. Newtonalized orthogonal matching pursuit for the linear frequency-modulated pulse frequency agile radar. IET Radar Sonar Navig. 2021, 15(12), 1670–1686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kay, S. M. Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing: Estimation Theory; Prentice-Hall, Inc.: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]







| Simulation Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| OFDM Modulation | QPSK |
| Subcarrier channels | 128 |
| Cyclic Prefix Length | 32 |
| Channel Type | Two-path channel and Cost-207 channels |
| Path Delay range | to |
| Oversampling factor | 4 |
| SNR range | to |
| Monte Carlo Simulations | 50 |
![]() |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).


