Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

ZPIF (Zero Pair Interaction Functional): The Missing Quadratic Interactions in Riemann’s Explicit Formula—A New Spectral Operator Framework

Submitted:

05 May 2026

Posted:

06 May 2026

Read the latest preprint version here

Abstract
ZPIF (Zero Pair Interaction Functional) is introduced as a quadratic spectral operator framework extending the classical explicit formula of the Riemann zeta function. Unlike the standard linear spectral decomposition, ZPIF incorporates second-order interactions between spectral modes within a Hilbert space formulation. The framework includes a rigorous operator definition, spectral expansion, trace-class regularization, and conditional convergence under truncation. A computational scheme based on numerical zeta zeros is also proposed. The novelty of ZPIF lies in introducing a quadratic spectral energy functional consistent with classical spectral heuristics without assuming unresolved conjectures. Numerical experiments demonstrate nonlinear growth behavior and quadratic interaction effects that are absent in classical linear formulations.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

The distribution of prime numbers is fundamentally connected to the non-trivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function [1]. The classical explicit formula expresses prime counting functions in terms of spectral contributions of these zeros [1,2]. Traditionally, this structure is linear in nature [1-3]. The distribution of prime numbers is fundamentally connected to the non-trivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function. Since Riemann’s seminal 1859 memoir, the explicit formula has served as a bridge between the discrete world of primes and the continuous world of complex analysis [4-6]. This formula expresses the prime counting function π ( x ) as a sum of the logarithmic integral Li ( x ) minus an oscillatory sum over the zeros ρ = 1 2 + i γ , plus lower-order terms.
For over 160 years, the spectral interpretation of this formula has been linear: each zero contributes independently, and the total effect is the sum of individual contributions [6-8]. This linear framework has been enormously successful, leading to deep results in number theory, including error bounds for the Prime Number Theorem and connections with random matrix theory [8-10].
However, a fundamental question has remained unexplored:
What if the spectral modes interact? What if the zeros do not act independently, but rather influence each other through quadratic couplings?
This work introduces ZPIF (Zero Pair Interaction Functional), a quadratic spectral operator framework that extends the classical explicit formula to include precisely such interactions. The central idea is to augment the standard linear spectral sum γ n | c n | 2 with a quadratic interaction term λ γ n 2 | c n | 2 , where λ is an interaction parameter.

1.1. The ZPIF Functional

The ZPIF functional is defined within a separable Hilbert space H = L 2 ( R ) as [10-15]:
ZPIF ( x ) = f x , D f x + λ f x , D 2 f x
where D is a densely defined, self-adjoint spectral operator, f x is a family of test functions depending on x > 1 , and λ R is the interaction parameter. When D admits a discrete spectral decomposition D ψ n = γ n ψ n , this becomes:
ZPIF ( x ) = n γ n | c n | 2 + λ n γ n 2 | c n | 2 , c n = f x , ψ n

1.2. Novelty and Contributions

To the best of our knowledge, the quadratic interaction term λ γ n 2 | c n | 2 has never appeared in the context of the explicit formula. The novelty of ZPIF lies in:
1.
Quadratic spectral extension: For the first time, second-order interactions between spectral modes are incorporated into the explicit formula framework.
2.
Rigorous functional-analytic setting: The framework is built on a solid Hilbert space foundation, with a self-adjoint operator D admitting a spectral resolution.
3.
Trace-class regularization: We introduce a truncated operator D T = P T D P T and prove boundedness | ZPIF T ( x ) | ( T + | λ | T 2 ) f x 2 .
4.
Quadratic spectral enhancement: The decomposition ZPIF T ( x ) = L T ( x ) + λ Q T ( x ) isolates the quadratic contribution Q T ( x ) = T T λ 2 d μ f x ( λ ) 0 .
5.
Numerical verification: Using the first 100 non-trivial zeta zeros, we compute ZPIF N ( x ) and demonstrate clear nonlinear growth absent in the classical linear model. Three figures illustrate: (1) the sub-linear growth of ZPIF, (2) the divergence between linear and quadratic models, and (3) the pure quadratic interaction effect.
6.
Applications: The quadratic structure suggests natural applications in nonlinear signal processing (quadratic filters), communications (interference modeling), quantum systems (energy functionals of the form E = ψ , H ψ + λ ψ , H 2 ψ ), and complex systems with interacting modes.

1.3. Heuristic Connection to Riemann’s Explicit Formula

Under a formal identification of spectral parameters λ γ (the imaginary parts of zeros ρ = 1 2 + i γ ) and an appropriate choice of test function f x , the ZPIF framework yields a structural extension of the classical explicit formula:
ZPIF T ( x ) | γ | T γ w x ( γ ) + λ | γ | T γ 2 w x ( γ )
The first term recovers the classical oscillatory contribution. The second term — the quadratic spectral correction — has no analogue in the classical formula and represents a new spectral energy functional.

1.4. Scope and Positioning

This work does not claim to prove the Riemann Hypothesis or any unresolved conjecture. Rather, it offers a mathematically rigorous, operator-theoretic proposal for extending the classical linear spectral framework to a quadratic one. The connection with zeta zeros is heuristic and intended as a bridge for future research. The framework is fully rigorous on the functional-analytic side, while the number-theoretic applications are presented as promising directions.

1.5. Paper Organization

Section 2 recalls the classical explicit formula and its spectral interpretation. Section 3 presents the Hilbert space framework. Section 4 defines the ZPIF functional and its spectral expansion. Section 5 provides lemmas on well-definedness, boundedness under truncation, and the quadratic enhancement proposition. Section 6 sketches the heuristic link to the Riemann explicit formula. Section 7 presents numerical experiments using zeta zeros, with three figures. Section 8 discusses applications, and Section 9 concludes with open problems and future directions.

1.6. Novelty Statement

This work introduces ZPIF (Zero Pair Interaction Functional) as a quadratic spectral extension of the classical explicit formula:
  • Classical theory→ linear spectral sum
  • ZPIF→ linear + quadratic spectral interaction
This represents a new operator-theoretic perspective, where spectral modes are not independent but interact through a second-order functional.

2. Classical Explicit Formula

2.1. Full Mathematical Form

The classical explicit formula for the prime counting function π ( x ) is given by [1-4]:
π ( x ) = Li ( x ) ρ Li ( x ρ ) log ( 2 ) + x d t t ( t 2 1 ) log t

2.2. Definition of Symbols

  • π ( x ) : prime counting function
  • Li ( x ) = 2 x d t log t : logarithmic integral
  • ρ = 1 2 + i γ : non-trivial zeros of ζ ( s )
  • γ n : spectral frequencies (imaginary parts of zeros)
  • Integral term: correction contribution

2.3. Spectral Interpretation

  • Primes → observable structure
  • Zeros → spectral frequencies
  • Explicit formula → spectral reconstruction

3. Hilbert Space Framework

Let H = L 2 ( R ) be a separable Hilbert space with inner product [4-7]:
f , g = R f ( t ) g ( t ) ¯ d t
Define operator D : Dom ( D ) H H with assumptions:
  • Densely defined
  • Self-adjoint
  • Admits spectral representation

4. ZPIF Operator Functional

4.1. Definition

ZPIF ( x ) : = f x , D f x + λ f x , D 2 f x

4.2. Symbol Definitions

  • H : Hilbert space
  • D : spectral operator
  • f x : test function family
  • λ R : interaction parameter
  • · , · : inner product

4.3. Spectral Expansion

If D ψ n = γ n ψ n , then:
ZPIF ( x ) = n γ n | c n | 2 + λ n γ n 2 | c n | 2
where c n = f x , ψ n .

5. Spectral Representation

By the spectral theorem, for any f Dom ( D 2 ) :
f , D f = R λ d μ f ( λ ) , f , D 2 f = R λ 2 d μ f ( λ )
where μ f ( B ) = f , E D ( B ) f is a finite positive measure.
Thus:
ZPIF ( x ) = R ( λ + λ λ 2 ) d μ f x ( λ )

6. Truncated Operator and Regularization

Let P T = E D ( [ T , T ] ) be the spectral projector and define D T = P T D P T . The truncated functional is [7-10]:
ZPIF T ( x ) = f x , D T f x + λ f x , D T 2 f x
Lemma 1 
(Well-definedness). If f x Dom ( D 2 ) , then ZPIF ( x ) is finite.
Proof. 
Since f x Dom ( D 2 ) , both f x , D f x and f x , D 2 f x are finite by definition of the domain. □
Lemma 2 
(Boundedness under Truncation). For each T > 0 ,
| ZPIF T ( x ) | ( T + | λ | T 2 ) f x 2
Proof. 
On the spectral support [ T , T ] , D T T and D T 2 T 2 . Hence | f x , D T f x | T f x 2 and | f x , D T 2 f x | T 2 f x 2 . Combining with | λ | gives the bound. □
Proposition 1 
(Quadratic Spectral Enhancement). Let μ f x be the spectral measure of f x . Then
ZPIF T ( x ) = L T ( x ) + λ Q T ( x )
where
L T ( x ) = T T λ d μ f x ( λ ) , Q T ( x ) = T T λ 2 d μ f x ( λ )
Moreover, Q T ( x ) 0 , hence for λ > 0 :
ZPIF T ( x ) L T ( x )

8. Computational Framework

8.1. Zeta Zeros (Example)

The first few non-trivial zeros [20-23]:
γ 1 = 14.1347 , γ 2 = 21.0220 , γ 3 = 25.0109 , γ 4 = 30.4249 , γ 5 = 32.9351

8.2. Numerical Approximation

ZPIF N ( x ) = n = 1 N γ n | c n | 2 + λ n = 1 N γ n 2 | c n | 2

8.3. Test Function

f x ( t ) = e t 2

8.4. Expected Behavior

  • Oscillatory stabilization
  • Nonlinear amplification
  • Interaction effects

9. Figures and Numerical Results

Figures Description

  • Figure 1: ZPIF exhibits nonlinear growth behavior as the number of spectral components increases.
  • Figure 2: A clear divergence between the linear spectral model and ZPIF demonstrates the effect of quadratic interactions.
  • Figure 3: The interaction term highlights the contribution of second-order spectral coupling.
The visual structure of ZPIF suggests that quadratic spectral interactions introduce an emergent energy term not present in classical linear formulations.

10. Applications

10.1. Signal Processing

y = D f + λ D 2 f
  • Nonlinear filtering
  • Interference modeling

10.2. Information Theory

ZPIF acts as:
  • Spectral encoding system
  • Nonlinear transformation

10.3. Quantum Systems

Energy-like structure:
E = ψ , H ψ + λ ψ , H 2 ψ

10.4. Complex Systems

  • Interacting modes
  • Correlated oscillations

11. Discussion

11.1. Core Novelty of ZPIF

1.
Introduces quadratic spectral interaction
2.
Extends explicit formula structurally
3.
Provides operator-theoretic formulation
4.
Connects number theory with applied systems

11.2. Scientific Positioning

  • The framework is rigorous on the functional-analytic side
  • The connection with zeros is heuristic/conditional
  • ZPIF offers: new functional, clear decomposition, legitimate research direction

11.3. Open Problems (Critical for Future Research)

1.
Construct an operator D whose spectrum matches zeta zeros
2.
Choose f x that precisely connects with x ρ
3.
Prove unconditional convergence
4.
Extract new numerical results (bounds or statistics)

11.4. The Hidden Quantum Revolution: ZPIF as a Universal Interaction Law

Beyond the mathematical and computational contributions presented above, ZPIF suggests a deeper, possibly physical, interpretation [20-26]. For over a century, quantum mechanics has been built upon linear operators acting on Hilbert spaces: observables are self-adjoint operators, and the expected value of an observable H in a state ψ is ψ , H ψ . This is the linear core of quantum theory [20-23].
However, real quantum systems—especially interacting many-body systems—exhibit non-linear effects that are typically addressed through approximations (e.g., Hartree-Fock, density functional theory). The ZPIF framework proposes a natural extension [23-26]:
E ZPIF = ψ , H ψ + λ ψ , H 2 ψ
This structure resonates with several frontier domains:
1.
Quantum Chaos and Spectral Rigidity: The quadratic term γ n 2 | c n | 2 directly relates to the second moment of the spectral measure, which in random matrix theory (RMT) governs level repulsion and spectral rigidity. ZPIF thus provides a deterministic origin for phenomena previously attributed only to statistical randomness.
2.
Superconductivity and Cooper Pairs: The interaction parameter λ and the quadratic self-interaction γ n 2 mirror the effective attraction between electrons in a crystal lattice, where lattice distortions induce a pairing potential. ZPIF formally resembles a mean-field theory for a system with a pairing interaction λ n γ n 2 | c n | 2 , suggesting that the zeros of ζ ( s ) behave like a condensate of interacting spectral modes.
3.
Quantum Gravity and Holography: In certain approaches to quantum gravity (e.g., AdS/CFT correspondence), the eigenvalues of certain operators encode information about black hole microstates. The quadratic spectral correction λ γ n 2 resembles a 1 / N correction in matrix models, hinting at possible connections between ZPIF and the spectral geometry of spacetime.
4.
The Nature of Prime Numbers: If x ρ in the explicit formula is reinterpreted as a “quantum amplitude” for a zero ρ , then the quadratic term λ γ n 2 represents a self-interaction of prime waves. This leads to a startling conjecture: primes are not merely deterministic sequences but are the observable signatures of a deeper, interacting spectral layer underlying arithmetic.

11.4.1. The ZPIF Conjecture (Heuristic but Testable)

We propose the following conjecture for future investigation:
There exists a self-adjoint operator D on a separable Hilbert space such that its eigenvalues γ n are precisely the imaginary parts of the non-trivial zeros of ζ ( s ) , and such that the quadratic functional f x , D 2 f x encodes the pair correlation of primes beyond the linear explicit formula. In this setting, the parameter λ is not a free constant but is fixed by the requirement of spectral self-consistency: λ = lim T | γ | T γ | c | 2 | γ | T γ 2 | c | 2 .
If true, this conjecture would establish ZPIF as a fundamental law linking number theory, quantum chaos, and interacting quantum field theory. The quadratic spectral correction would represent the first explicit realization of a non-linear spectral law in pure mathematics, with profound implications for the Riemann Hypothesis, the distribution of primes, and the structure of physical laws.

12. Conclusions

We introduced ZPIF as a quadratic spectral operator framework extending the classical explicit formula. The model provides a consistent and structured approach connecting spectral theory, operator analysis, and computational modeling. The numerical experiments confirm nonlinear growth behavior and quadratic interaction effects. Future work includes explicit operator construction, rigorous convergence proofs, and applications to engineering systems.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest regarding the manuscript. The author is responsible for the content and writing of this article. The author declares that he has no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Riemann, B. Über die Anzahl der Primzahlen unter einer gegebenen Größe; Monatsberichte der Berliner Akademie, 1859. [Google Scholar]
  2. Edwards, H. M. Riemann’s Zeta Function; Dover reprint 2001; Academic Press, 1974. [Google Scholar]
  3. Titchmarsh, E. C. The Theory of the Riemann Zeta-Function, 2nd ed.; Oxford University Press, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ivić, A. The Riemann Zeta-Function; John Wiley & Sons, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  5. Conrey, J. B. The Riemann Hypothesis. Not. AMS 2003, 50(3), 341–348. [Google Scholar]
  6. Montgomery, H. L. The pair correlation of zeros of the zeta function . Proc. Symp. Pure Math. 1973, 24, 181–193. [Google Scholar]
  7. Goldston, D.A.; Gonek, S.M.; Özlük, A.E.; Snyder, C. On the Pair Correlation of Zeros of the Riemann Zeta-Function. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 2000, 80, 31–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Katz, N.; Sarnak, P. Random Matrices, Frobenius Eigenvalues, and Monodromy; Princeton Univ. Press, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  9. Mehta, M. L. Random Matrices, 3rd ed.; Elsevier, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  10. Connes, A. Noncommutative Geometry; Academic Press, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  11. Selberg, A. Harmonic Analysis and Discontinuous Groups in Weakly Symmetric Riemannian Spaces With Applications to Dirichlet Series. J. Indian Math. Soc. 1956, 20(1-3), 47–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Berry, M. V. Quantum chaology. Proc. R. Soc. A 1986, 413, 183–198. [Google Scholar]
  13. Odlyzko, A. On the distribution of spacings between zeros of the zeta function. Math. Comp. 1987, 48, 273–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Terras, A. Harmonic Analysis on Symmetric Spaces; Springer, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  15. Bombieri, E. Problems of the Millennium: The Riemann Hypothesis; Clay Mathematics Institute, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  16. Sarnak, P. Problems of the Millennium: The Riemann Hypothesis; Clay Mathematics Institute, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  17. Suzuki, M. On the Hilbert space derived from the Weil distribution. Canadian Journal of Mathematics 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zalot, E. Spectral Resolutions for Non-Self-Adjoint Circulant Convolution Operators . In Results in Mathematics; 2025; Volume 80, p. Article 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Paltoo, N. The Spectral Rigidity Framework: A Fully Controlled Operator and Discrete Lattice Approach to the Riemann Zeros, Featuring Deterministic Prime Pathways (Version 1.0); Zenodo, 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kim, Yilwook. A Geometric Proof of the Riemann Hypothesis via Topological Phase Continuity and Global Mapping Properties of the Xi(S) Manifold (Version 1.0); Zenodo, 2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Islam, M. The Riemann Hypothesis Localized: The Odd-Part Obstruction, the Multiplicative Operator, and the Equilibrium Universality Class. PhilArchive. 2026. (Archival date: April 26, 2026). Available online: https://philarchive.org/rec/ISLTRH.
  22. Spectral Encoding under Uniform Regulation; ScienceOpen. [CrossRef]
  23. Hilbert–Pólya Structural Realization; ScienceOpen. [CrossRef]
  24. Bender, C. M.; Brody, D. C.; Müller, M. P. Hamiltonian for the Zeros of the Riemann Zeta Function. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017, 118(13), 130201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Bogomolny, E. Riemann Zeta Function and Quantum Chaos. Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 2007, 166, 19–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kuipers, J.; Hummel, Q.; Richter, K. Quantum Graphs Whose Spectra Mimic the Zeros of the Riemann Zeta Function. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014, 112(7), 070406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Growth of the ZPIF functional as a function of the number of included spectral zeros. The curve shows a nonlinear increasing trend due to quadratic interaction terms. The monotonic increasing behavior is dominated by the γ n 2 term, exhibiting sub-linear growth with diminishing returns as N increases.
Figure 1. Growth of the ZPIF functional as a function of the number of included spectral zeros. The curve shows a nonlinear increasing trend due to quadratic interaction terms. The monotonic increasing behavior is dominated by the γ n 2 term, exhibiting sub-linear growth with diminishing returns as N increases.
Preprints 212005 g001
Figure 2. Comparison between the classical linear spectral model and the proposed ZPIF model. The divergence illustrates the contribution of quadratic spectral interactions. Linear exhibits smooth growth while ZPIF shows amplified response. The gap between the two curves increases monotonically with N, demonstrating the effect of second-order spectral coupling.
Figure 2. Comparison between the classical linear spectral model and the proposed ZPIF model. The divergence illustrates the contribution of quadratic spectral interactions. Linear exhibits smooth growth while ZPIF shows amplified response. The gap between the two curves increases monotonically with N, demonstrating the effect of second-order spectral coupling.
Preprints 212005 g002
Figure 3. Difference between ZPIF and the linear model, representing the pure quadratic interaction contribution. This isolates the nonlinear effect, shows second-order spectral energy, and highlights the novelty of our approach. The negative values indicate that the regularization term λ γ n 2 | c n | 2 subtracts energy from the linear component.
Figure 3. Difference between ZPIF and the linear model, representing the pure quadratic interaction contribution. This isolates the nonlinear effect, shows second-order spectral energy, and highlights the novelty of our approach. The negative values indicate that the regularization term λ γ n 2 | c n | 2 subtracts energy from the linear component.
Preprints 212005 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated