Submitted:
20 April 2026
Posted:
22 April 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Literature Analysis
3. Dimensions of the Model
- A strategy that includes a mission, vision and strategic goals is not just abstract concepts. The strategy in the Industry 5.0 maturity model focuses on the use of modern technologies, innovation and operational flexibility to achieve competitiveness and adaptation to a rapidly changing market environment.
- Employees (their actions, attitudes and values, competencies, scope of cooperation, leadership) are an important element of the organization and are the driving force of the company. In the era of Industry 5.0, where technology is playing an increasingly important role, the importance of people is not decreasing, but on the contrary - it is becoming even more important. Their adaptability, collaboration and effective leadership are crucial to success in a dynamic and uncertain business environment.
- Processes of preparing goods for sale are an important part of the activities of logistics distribution centers. Within these processes, the key role is played by the workflow, procedures, methods and coordination systems, including both management processes and technologies used in the organization. Companies should invest in the development and improvement of these processes, using modern technologies and best management practices to ensure the reliability and correctness of order execution as well as eliminate errors. In the context of Industry 5.0, technologies that not only automate processes, but also enable adaptation to changing market conditions play an important role.
- Transport processes, including comprehensive management of the flow of materials and information, integrate suppliers and customers. In the era of Industry 5.0, logistics is becoming an even more crucial element, due to the increasing complexity of the supply chain and the need to react quickly to market changes. The model should therefore include a comprehensive approach to cooperation with suppliers and customers, as part of Industry 5.0 IT tools, used in logistics processes. Cooperation with suppliers and customers is not only becoming crucial for the effective functioning of the supply chain, but also for ensuring flexibility and responsiveness to market changes. IT tools play a fundamental role in streamlining and optimizing logistics processes, enabling more accurate forecasting, monitoring, and management of the flow of materials and information. This approach will allow companies to effectively adapt to new market requirements and achieve a competitive advantage, as well as measure utility. It is worth adding that greater logistical flexibility of the company (e.g., diversification of means of transport, increasing the role of railways and inland navigation) is associated with greater use of ecological solutions. As a result, it can lead to an increase in the company’s image in the market.
- Resources (infrastructure and cybersecurity), both infrastructural and digital, are the foundation of a company’s operations. Infrastructure provides the physical space and tools to execute processes, while digital assets, along with the cybersecurity aspect, enable data and communication management. In the era of Industry 5.0, a comprehensive maturity model should consider the resource aspect. It is crucial because modern digital technologies and infrastructure are integral elements of the transformation of modern production plants.
- Logistics products or services are the result of the activities of a logistics company. In today’s dynamic business environment, the process of product design and development plays a key role, determining the innovation and competitiveness of the company. In the era of Industry 5.0, where the pace of change is extremely fast, this process is becoming even more complex and dynamic, requiring constant adaptation and sometimes complete redefinition to meet new challenges and customer expectations.
- The business results module includes the results for each of the previous modules. The assessment of the workforce criterion was not considered due to their limited measurability. There are difficulties in objectively measuring employee achievement or performance, which means that an organization may choose not to include this data and focus on other areas during the assessment. The strategy module uses financial and non-financial indicators to measure the strategic and operational results of the implementation of the Industry 4.0 concept. Examples of organizational KPIs may include: revenue, book profit, operating profit (EBITDA), investments, rate of return on investment of the Industry 5.0 tool, costs of Industry 5.0 projects, and compliance with the budget of Industry 5.0 implementations. It is best to take a 5-year perspective of indicators, covering the current year (n), the previous year (n-1) and two years back (n-2). On the other hand, planning should refer to the next year (n+1) and the period in 2 years (n+2). In the results section of Logistics, business results will be about increasing delivery precision. By using transport systems based on Industry 4.0 technologies, organizations can increase the precision and reliability of their deliveries, leading to increased customer satisfaction. The key indicator is On-Time Delivery. It is an indicator used in logistics to measure the degree of completion of the delivery of products or services according to the set deadlines. In addition, this indicator is also used in production and distribution. Companies try to maintain the highest possible level of on-time delivery, as delays in deliveries can lead to customer dissatisfaction, financial losses, and problems related to production and resource planning.
- Lack of approach - the company does not apply any elements of the Industry 4.0 concept or there are isolated cases of informal application of a given criterion.
- There is a need for application - to start formally applying a given criterion with varying degrees of success.
- Applied tool - a criterion implemented in a systematic way in the company. The first positive effects resulting from the implementation are visible, the beginnings of standardization
- Reliability in approach - a criterion fully applied in the company. Elements of improvement are visible.
- Benchmark, Best in the Industry - all areas successfully apply a given criterion with visible positive effects. The implemented solutions are an example of best-in-class and are constantly being improved.



4. Advantages of the Maturity Model
- Assessment of the current state: the model allows the company to assess its current state before and during the implementation of the Industry 5.0 concept. This is a key aspect to understand where the company is located and what steps are needed to grow;
- Understanding the needs: The first step is to fully understand the needs and goals of the company related to Industry 5.0, which allows the model to be properly adapted. With a flexible approach, the model can be tailored to the specific needs and conditions of the enterprise, allowing you to personalize your deployment strategy.
- Identifying areas for improvement: through analysis, the model helps identify areas that need improvement and investment, allowing you to focus on key areas. A company can increase production efficiency, resource management and product quality using new technologies.
- The model supports change management, which is crucial when introducing new technologies and processes in the company. It helps minimize resistance and makes it easier to move to new solutions. It also helps to involve employees at different organizational levels in the process of evaluating and implementing the model is crucial for success.
- It allows you to track the progress of the implementation of Industry 5.0, which allows you to adapt the strategy to the needs and results achieved on an ongoing basis. The model should be updated regularly to reflect changes in technologies, the market, and the needs of the company. Continuous monitoring and measurement of progress in model implementation allows for more effective decision-making and strategy adjustments. The improvement process should be continuous, and the model must support an organizational culture focused on continuous improvement.
- The use of intelligent storage systems allows for better control and management of inventory, which can lead to a reduction in inventory levels and costs associated with storage. The main indicator can be the level of inventory or the stock level. It means the amount of products or goods that are in stock now. Inventory levels are an important aspect for businesses because it affects product availability, the ability to handle customer orders, and storage costs. Organizations strive to manage their inventory levels in such a way as to meet customer demand while minimizing storage costs and the risk of product loss.
- The Inventory Outstanding Period Indicator or Days Inventory Outstanding DIO is used in inventory management. It measures the average number of days that a company keeps its inventory before it is sold or consumed. This indicator helps to assess how long a company keeps products in stock, which has an impact on storage costs and the company’s financial liquidity. The lower the DIO, the shorter the inventory turnover period, and therefore the more effective management.
- With the flexibility of logistics systems, organizations can respond more quickly to changes in orders and customer preferences, leading to reduced order fulfillment times. The Customer Service Level (CSL) indicator shows how effectively a company delivers products or services in line with customer expectations.
5. Conclusion
References
- Maier, A. M.; Moultrie, J.; Clarkson, P. J. Assessing Organizational Capabilities: Reviewing and Guiding the Development of Maturity Grids [Article]. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2012, - Vols. vol. 59(no. 1), 138–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pöppelbuß, J.; Röglinger, M. What makes a useful maturity model? A framework of general design principles for maturity models and its demonstration in business process management [Conference]. 19th Eur. Conf. Inf. Syst. ECIS 2011, - June 2011. [Google Scholar]
- García-Mireles, G. A.; Ángeles Moraga, M.; García, F. Development of maturity models: a systematic literature review [Conference] // 16th International Conference on Evaluation & Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE 2012). 2012; pp. 279–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rojko, A. ndustry 4.0 Concept: Background and Overview [Article]. Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol. - 2017, - no 5: Vol. vol 11. -, 77–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fraser, P.; Moulitrie, J.; Gregory, M. The use of maturity models/grids as a tool in assessing product development capability [Conference]. IEEE Int. Eng. Manag. Conf., 2002: [s.n. [Google Scholar]
- Banyani, M. A.; Then, D. S.S. Development of the industry maturity framework facilities manage- ment [Conference]. Proceedings 5th Built Environment Conference, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Schumacher, A.; Erol, S.; Sihn, W. A Maturity Model for Assessing Industry 4.0 Readiness and Ma- turity of Manufacturing Enterprises [Article]. Procedia CIRP 2016, Vol. vol. 52., 161–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Strandhagen, J. O.; Vallandingham, L. R.; Fragapane, G. Logistics 4.0 and emerging sustainable business models [Article]. Adv.Manuf. 2017, Vol. 359. [Google Scholar]
- Dikhanbayeva, D. et al.] Assessment of Industry 4.0 Maturity Models by Design Principles [Book; School of Engineering and Digital Sciences Nazarbayev University: Nur-Sultan, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Schuh, G. ndustry 4.0 Maturity Index: Managing the Digital Transformation of Companies [Book]; Herbert Utz Verlag: Munich, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- De Carolis, A. Maturity Model for Assessing the Digital Readiness of Manufacturing Companies, [Conference] // Proceedings of the IFIP International Conference on Advances in Production Management Systems. s.n, Hamburg, 2017; vol. 513, p. Vols. 3–7.08. - pp. 13-20. [Google Scholar]
- Szewczyk, K. Maturity model for the implementation of the Industry 4.0 concept in automotive industry enterprises [Book]; Wrocław University of Economics: Wrocław, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Lichtblau, K. Impuls: Industrie 4.0 Readiness [Book]; VDMA: Cologne, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Rockwell Automation The Connected Enterprise Maturity Model [Book]; Rockwell Automation: Milwaukee, 2014.
- Gökalp, E.; Sener, U.; Eren, P. E. Development of an Assessment Model for Industry 4.0: Industry 4.0-MM [Conference] // Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination. - alma de Mallorca, : [s.n.], 4–5.10.2017. - Vol. vol. 1. - pp. 30-42.
- Schumacher, A.; Erol, S.; Sihn, W. Maturity Model for Assessing Industry 4.0 Readiness and Maturity of Manufacturing Enterprises [Article]. Procedia CIRP 2016. - 52/2016. -, 161–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akdil, K. Y.; Ustundag, A. Maturity and Readiness Model for Industry 4.0 Strategy [Book Section] // Industry 4.0: Managing the Digital Transformation / book auth; Cevikcan, E., Ed.; Springer: Cham, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Bitkom, V.D.M.A. ZVEI Implementation Strategy Industrie 4.0: Report on the results of the Industrie 4.0 Platform [Report]; Berlin, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Leyh, C. SIMMI 4.0 A maturity model for classifying the enterprise-wide it and software landscape focusing on Industry 4.0 [Conference] // Proceedings of the 2016 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems. s.n, Gdańsk, 11–14.08.2016. [Google Scholar]
- Ganzarain, J.; Errasti, N. Three stage maturity model in SME’s towards industry 4.0 [Article]. Journal Enginering. Managazine 2016, Vol. 9. [Google Scholar]
- Waterman, R. H.; Peters, T. J.; Phillips, J. R. Structure is not organization [Article]. In Business Horizons; 1980; p. 18. [Google Scholar]
- Weisbord, M. B. Organizational diagnosis: Six places to look for trouble with or without a theory [Article]. In Group and Organization Studies; 1976; Vol. 1, 4, pp. 430–447. [Google Scholar]
- Ministry of Regional Development Smart Industry Polska 2017 [Report]. Siemens Sp. z. o. o.: Warszawa, 2017.
- Martusewicz, J.; Szewczyk, K.; Wierzbic, A. The Environmental Protection and Effective Energy Consumption in the Light of the EFQM Model 2020—Case Study [Journal]. s.l.]: Energies 2022, 15, 7260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martusewicz, J.; Szewczyk, K.; Wierzbic, A. The EFQM Radar-Based Assessment Of Industry 4.0 Solutions – The Plan of Research [Journal]. - [s.l.]: A 2025 Vision to Sustain Economic Development during Global Challenges; Soliman Khalid, S., Ed.; International Business Information Management Association (IBIMA), 2020; ISBN 9780999855141. - pp. pp. 18547-18554. [Google Scholar]
- EFQM he EFQM Excellence Model 2013 - he EFQM Excellence Model 2013. 2025.
- AlAdeedi, A. A. Investigating The Use of GEM2.1 Excellence Model in Contributing to Sustainability in The UAE [Journal]. International Journal of Accounting and Economics Studies 2025, 12(2), 2025. - pp. 429-436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martusewicz, J.; Wierzbic, A.; Łukaszewicz, M. Strategic Transformation and Sustainability: Unveiling the EFQM Model 2025 [Journal]. Sustainability 2024, 16, 9106, 2024.–Vol. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aquilani, B. The Role of Open Innovation and Value Co- -creation in the Challenging Transition from Industry 4.0 to Society 5.0: Toward a Theoretical Framework [Journal]; Sustainability, 2020; Volume 12, p. 8943. [Google Scholar]
- Hamera, A. The role of user experience in the era of Industry 5.0 [Journal]. Enterprise Management, Enterprise Management. December 2024; Volume 2: Vol. Nb. 2, p. - pp. pp. 7-15. [Google Scholar]
- Bajic, B.; Moraca, S.; Rikalovic, A. uzzy maturity model for smart manufacturing readiness: Industry 5.0 perspective [Conference] // Zooming Innovation in Consumer Technologies Conference (ZINC). - 2023. - Vols. 142-147; IEEE. [CrossRef]
- Oleśków-Szłapka, J.; Kretkowska, L.; Zielińska, A. Industry 5.0 Maturity Models: Towards Sustainable Development – Theoretical Review and Case Study in a Selected Company [Journal]; European Research Studies Journal, 2024; - Vols. Volume XXVII, p. 1. [Google Scholar]
- Ericson Öberg, A.; Goncalves Machado, C.; Stålberg, L. Diagnostics of Opportunitie s - A Dialogue Tool for Addressing Digital Factory Maturity [Article]. In Sustainable Production through Advanced Manufacturing, Intelligent Automation and Work Integrated Learning; IOS Press, 2024; pp. 395–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hein-Pensel. Maturity assessment for Industry 5.0: A review of existing maturity models [Online]. September 2025. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027861252200228X?via%3Dihub.
- Zizic, M. C. From Industry 4.0 towards Industry 5.0: A Review and Analysis of Paradigm Shift for the People, Organization and Technology [Journal]. Energies. MDPI, 2022; Vol. 5221. [Google Scholar]

| Model Number | Model Name | Authors | Model Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| MD01 | Diagnostics of Opportunities – A Dialogue Tool for Addressing Digital Factory Maturity | Ericson Öberg,A. Goncalves Machado, C. Stålberg, L. |
The model includes 10 degrees of maturity. It focuses on a development approach, from a lack of knowledge to a highly developed expert approach and becoming a role model for other organizations. |
| MD02 | Maturity assessment for Industry 5.0: A review of existing maturity models | Hein-Pensel, F., Winkler, H., Brückner, A., Wölke, M., Jabs, I., Mayan I.J., Kirschenbaum, A., Friedrich, J., Zinke-Wehlmann, Ch. | The model contains 4 levels of maturity. It puts the human at the center, for whom a system of advanced technology has been built to comprehensively support their activities and needs in their daily work. |
| MD03 | From Industry 4.0 towards Industry 5.0: A Review and Analysis of Paradigm Shift for the People, Organization and Technology | Zizic, M.C. Mladineo, M. Gjeldum, N. Celent, L. | It focuses on detailing the differences between Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).