Submitted:
20 April 2026
Posted:
21 April 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
MSC: 68U10; 94A08
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Channel Attention
2.2. Spatial Attention
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. FAFG Overall Architecture
3.2. Static Scaling and Its Limitation
3.3. FAFG Implementation
3.4. Efficiency Superiority over Conventional Gating
3.5. Datasets, Metrics and Implementation
4. Results
4.1. Ablation Study
4.2. Efficiency Analysis
4.3. Comparison with State-of-the-Art Methods
5. Discussion
5.1. Interpretation of Frequency-Aware Gating
5.2. Robustness and Generalization across Diverse Scenes
5.3. Societal and Environmental Implications
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| SISR | Single Image Super-Resolution |
| DRCT | Dense-Residual-Connected Transformer |
| FAFG | Frequency-Aware Adaptive Fusion Gate |
| DCT | Discrete Cosine Transform |
| RDG | Residual Dense Group |
| CNN | Convolutional Neural Network |
| GAP | Global Average Pooling |
| GMP | Global Max Pooling |
| MLP | Multi-Layer Perceptron |
| SDRCB | Swin Dense Residual Connected Block |
References
- LeCun, Y.; Bengio, Y.; Hinton, G. Deep learning. Nature 2015, 521, 436–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Voulodimos, A.; Doulamis, N.; Doulamis, A.; Protopapadakis, E. Deep learning for computer vision: A brief review. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, Z.; Chen, J.; Hoi, S.C. Deep learning for image super-resolution: A survey. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2020, 43, 3365–3387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Anwar, S.; Khan, S.; Barnes, N. A deep journey into super-resolution: A survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 2020, 53, 1–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Baker, S.; Kanade, T. Limits on super-resolution and how to break them. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2002, 24, 1167–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, C.Y.; Ma, C.; Yang, M.H. Single-image super-resolution: A benchmark. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), Zurich, Switzerland, 2014; pp. 372–386. [Google Scholar]
- Blau, Y.; Michaeli, T. The perception-distortion tradeoff. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 2018; pp. 6228–6237. [Google Scholar]
- Dong, C.; Loy, C.C.; He, K.; Tang, X. Image super-resolution using deep convolutional networks. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2015, 38, 295–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lim, B.; Son, S.; Kim, H.; Nah, S.; Mu Lee, K. Enhanced deep residual networks for single image super-resolution. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), Honolulu, HI, USA, 2017; pp. 136–144. [Google Scholar]
- Ledig, C.; Theis, L.; Huszár, F.; Caballero, J.; Cunningham, A.; Acosta, A.; et al. Photo-realistic single image super-resolution using a generative adversarial network. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Honolulu, HI, USA, 2017; pp. 4681–4690. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, X.; Yu, K.; Wu, S.; Gu, J.; Liu, Y.; Dong, C.; et al. ESRGAN: Enhanced super-resolution generative adversarial networks. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) Workshops, Munich, Germany, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Saharia, C.; Ho, J.; Chan, W.; Salimans, T.; Fleet, D.J.; Norouzi, M. Image super-resolution via iterative refinement. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2022, 45, 4713–4726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, Y.; Li, K.; Li, K.; Wang, L.; Zhong, B.; Fu, Y. Image super-resolution using very deep residual channel attention networks. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), Munich, Germany, 2018; pp. 286–301. [Google Scholar]
- Dai, T.; Cai, J.; Zhang, Y.; Xia, S.T.; Zhang, L. Second-order attention network for single image super-resolution. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Long Beach, CA, USA, 2019; pp. 11065–11074. [Google Scholar]
- Niu, B.; Wen, W.; Ren, W.; Zhang, X.; Yang, L.; Wang, S.; et al. Single image super-resolution via a holistic attention network. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), Glasgow, UK, 2020; pp. 191–207. [Google Scholar]
- Dosovitskiy, A.; et al. An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), Vienna, Austria, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, H.; Wang, Y.; Guo, T.; Xu, C.; Deng, Y.; Liu, Z.; et al. Pre-trained image processing transformer. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Nashville, TN, USA, 2021; pp. 12299–12310. [Google Scholar]
- Liang, J.; Cao, J.; Sun, G.; Zhang, K.; Van Gool, L.; Timofte, R. SwinIR: Image restoration using swin transformer. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Montreal, QC, Canada, 2021; pp. 1833–1844. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, X.; Wang, X.; Zhou, J.; Dong, C. Activating more pixels in image super-resolution transformer. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2023; pp. 22367–22377. [Google Scholar]
- Dong, C.; Loy, C.C.; Tang, X. Accelerating the super-resolution convolutional neural network. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 391–407. [Google Scholar]
- Ahn, N.; Kang, B.; Sohn, K.A. Fast, accurate, and lightweight super-resolution with cascading residual network. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), Munich, Germany, 2018; pp. 252–268. [Google Scholar]
- Ma, C.; Rao, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Chen, C.; Lu, J.; Zhou, J. Structure-preserving super resolution with gradient guidance. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Seattle, WA, USA, 2020; pp. 2776–2784. [Google Scholar]
- Lai, W.S.; Huang, J.B.; Ahuja, N.; Yang, M.H. Deep laplacian pyramid networks for fast and accurate super-resolution. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Honolulu, HI, USA, 2017; pp. 624–632. [Google Scholar]
- Li, J.; Fang, F.; Mei, K.; Zhang, G. Multi-scale residual network for image super-resolution. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), Munich, Germany, 2018; pp. 517–532. [Google Scholar]
- Hsu, C.C.; Lee, C.M.; Chou, Y.S. DRCT: Saving image super-resolution away from information bottleneck. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2404.00722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qin, Z.; Zhang, P.; Wu, F.; Li, X. FcaNet: Frequency channel attention networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Montreal, QC, Canada, 2021; pp. 783–792. [Google Scholar]
- Isaac, J.S.; Kulkarni, R. Super resolution techniques for medical image processing. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Technologies for Sustainable Development (ICTSD), Mumbai, India, 2015; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Zou, W.W.; Yuen, P.C. Very low resolution face recognition problem. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2011, 21, 327–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schwartz, R.; Dodge, J.; Smith, N.A.; Etzioni, O. Green AI. Commun. ACM 2020, 63, 54–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, J.; Shen, L.; Sun, G. Squeeze-and-excitation networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 2018; pp. 7132–7141. [Google Scholar]
- Woo, S.; Park, J.; Lee, J.Y.; Kweon, I.S. Cbam: Convolutional block attention module. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), Munich, Germany, 2018; pp. 3–19. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, D.; Wen, B.; Fan, Y.; Loy, C.C.; Huang, T.S. Non-local recurrent network for image restoration. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 2018, 31. [Google Scholar]
- Li, X.; Wang, W.; Hu, X.; Yang, J. Selective kernel networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Long Beach, CA, USA, 2019; pp. 510–519. [Google Scholar]
- Dai, Y.; Gieseke, F.; Oehmcke, S.; Wu, Y.; Barnard, K. Attentional feature fusion. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), Waikoloa, HI, USA, 2021; pp. 3560–3569. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, L.; Chu, X.; Zhang, X.; Sun, J. Simple baselines for image restoration. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), Tel Aviv, Israel, 2022; pp. 17–33. [Google Scholar]
- Zamir, S.W.; Arora, A.; Khan, S.; Hayat, M.; Khan, F.S.; Yang, M.H. Restormer: Efficient transformer for high-resolution image restoration. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), New Orleans, LA, USA, 2022; pp. 5728–5739. [Google Scholar]
- He, K.; Zhang, X.; Ren, S.; Sun, J. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, NV, USA, 2016; pp. 770–778. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, Z.; Lin, Y.; Cao, Y.; Hu, H.; Wei, Y.; Zhang, Z.; et al. Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Montreal, QC, Canada, 2021; pp. 10012–10022. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, M.; Chen, Q.; Yan, S. Network in network. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), Banff, AB, Canada, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Ahmed, N.; Natarajan, T.; Rao, K.R. Discrete cosine transform. IEEE Trans. Comput. 1974, 100, 90–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Srivastava, R.K.; Greff, K.; Schmidhuber, J. Highway networks. arXiv 2015, arXiv:1505.00387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]





| Method | Set5 | Set14 | Urban100 | |||
| PSNR | SSIM | PSNR | SSIM | PSNR | SSIM | |
| DRCT [25] | 30. 31 | 0. 8605 | 27. 36 | 0. 7512 | 24. 22 | 0. 7139 |
| GAP + MLP + Sigmoid | 30. 46 | 0. 8638 | 27. 45 | 0. 7533 | 24. 34 | 0. 7178 |
| Dual-Pooling (GAP+GMP)+ MLP + Sigmoid | 30. 45 | 0. 8641 | 27. 47 | 0. 7535 | 24. 35 | 0. 7193 |
| GAP + ECA + Sigmoid | 30. 56 | 0. 8669 | 27. 53 | 0. 7557 | 24. 42 | 0. 7230 |
| GAP + MLP + Sigmoid + Spatial Attention | 30. 57 | 0. 8664 | 27. 52 | 0. 7552 | 24. 42 | 0. 7223 |
| Dual-Pooling + MLP + Sigmoid + Spatial Attention | 30. 57 | 0. 8665 | 27. 53 | 0. 7553 | 24. 42 | 0. 7224 |
| DCT + MLP + Sigmoid + Spatial Attention | 30. 60 | 0. 8674 | 27. 54 | 0. 7557 | 24. 45 | 0. 7237 |
| DCT + MLP + Sigmoid (Ours) | 30.62 | 0.8679 | 27.58 | 0.7564 | 24.46 | 0.7243 |
| Method | Params (M) | FLOPs (G) |
| DRCT [25] | 14. 1396 | 59. 6449 |
| Ours (DRCT-FAFG) | 14. 1883 | 59. 6512 |
| Difference | +0.0487 | +0.0063 |
| Method | Set5 | Set14 | Urban100 | |||
| PSNR | SSIM | PSNR | SSIM | PSNR | SSIM | |
| DRCT [25] | 30. 31 | 0. 8605 | 27. 36 | 0. 7512 | 24. 22 | 0. 7139 |
| SwinIR [18] | 30. 08 | 0. 8540 | 27. 15 | 0. 7432 | 24. 08 | 0. 7046 |
| HAT [19] | 30. 11 | 0. 8553 | 27. 18 | 0. 7441 | 24. 09 | 0. 7055 |
| Ours (DRCT-FAFG) | 30.62 | 0.8679 | 27.58 | 0.7564 | 24.46 | 0.7243 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).